Details
| Originalsprache | Englisch |
|---|---|
| Seiten (von - bis) | 149-161 |
| Seitenumfang | 13 |
| Fachzeitschrift | Journal of Asian Ceramic Societies |
| Jahrgang | 8 |
| Ausgabenummer | 1 |
| Publikationsstatus | Veröffentlicht - 28 Jan. 2020 |
Abstract
This work aims to prepare low-cost nanocomposite and microcomposite with lower molar ratio CaO/SiO2 (0.4). Nano-silica, rice husk ash and calcined chicken eggshell have been used as silica and calcium sources. Metakaolin has been separately replaced by 0, 10 and 20 wt% of each composite in order to study their behavior on the properties of geopolymers. The hardener used is sodium waterglass from rice husk ash. The surface area of nano-silica and rice husk ash was 54.40 and 4.08 m2/g, respectively. The cumulative volumes of the control geopolymer, the ones containing 10 wt% of microcomposite and nanocomposite are 119.71, 89.92 and 110.49 mm3/g, respectively. The compressive strength of the control specimen is around 64.02 MPa. The one using 10 wt% of microcomposite was 68.97 MPa. It drops to 42.88 MPa when metakaolin was replaced by 20 wt % of microcomposite. Whereas the one using 10 wt% of nanocomposite was 30.03 MPa and it decreases to 26.05 MPa when metakaolin was substituted by 20 wt% of nanocomposite. It can be concluded that 10 wt% of microcomposite could be mixed to metakaolin for strength development and nanocomposite does not recommend to use as an additive for producing high strength of geopolymer cements.
ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete
- Werkstoffwissenschaften (insg.)
- Keramische und Verbundwerkstoffe
Zitieren
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTex
- RIS
in: Journal of Asian Ceramic Societies, Jahrgang 8, Nr. 1, 28.01.2020, S. 149-161.
Publikation: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift › Artikel › Forschung › Peer-Review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Preparation of low-cost nano and microcomposites from chicken eggshell, nano-silica and rice husk ash and their utilisations as additives for producing geopolymer cements
AU - Tchakouté, H. K.
AU - Tchinda Mabah, D. E.
AU - Henning Rüscher, C.
AU - Kamseu, E.
AU - Andreola, F.
AU - Bignozzi, M. C.
AU - Leonelli, C.
N1 - Funding Information: Dr. Hervé Tchakouté Kouamo gratefully acknowledges the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation for financial support this work under the grant N° KAM/1155741 GFHERMES-P. The authors would like to thank Dr. Valerie Petrov for SEM observations.
PY - 2020/1/28
Y1 - 2020/1/28
N2 - This work aims to prepare low-cost nanocomposite and microcomposite with lower molar ratio CaO/SiO2 (0.4). Nano-silica, rice husk ash and calcined chicken eggshell have been used as silica and calcium sources. Metakaolin has been separately replaced by 0, 10 and 20 wt% of each composite in order to study their behavior on the properties of geopolymers. The hardener used is sodium waterglass from rice husk ash. The surface area of nano-silica and rice husk ash was 54.40 and 4.08 m2/g, respectively. The cumulative volumes of the control geopolymer, the ones containing 10 wt% of microcomposite and nanocomposite are 119.71, 89.92 and 110.49 mm3/g, respectively. The compressive strength of the control specimen is around 64.02 MPa. The one using 10 wt% of microcomposite was 68.97 MPa. It drops to 42.88 MPa when metakaolin was replaced by 20 wt % of microcomposite. Whereas the one using 10 wt% of nanocomposite was 30.03 MPa and it decreases to 26.05 MPa when metakaolin was substituted by 20 wt% of nanocomposite. It can be concluded that 10 wt% of microcomposite could be mixed to metakaolin for strength development and nanocomposite does not recommend to use as an additive for producing high strength of geopolymer cements.
AB - This work aims to prepare low-cost nanocomposite and microcomposite with lower molar ratio CaO/SiO2 (0.4). Nano-silica, rice husk ash and calcined chicken eggshell have been used as silica and calcium sources. Metakaolin has been separately replaced by 0, 10 and 20 wt% of each composite in order to study their behavior on the properties of geopolymers. The hardener used is sodium waterglass from rice husk ash. The surface area of nano-silica and rice husk ash was 54.40 and 4.08 m2/g, respectively. The cumulative volumes of the control geopolymer, the ones containing 10 wt% of microcomposite and nanocomposite are 119.71, 89.92 and 110.49 mm3/g, respectively. The compressive strength of the control specimen is around 64.02 MPa. The one using 10 wt% of microcomposite was 68.97 MPa. It drops to 42.88 MPa when metakaolin was replaced by 20 wt % of microcomposite. Whereas the one using 10 wt% of nanocomposite was 30.03 MPa and it decreases to 26.05 MPa when metakaolin was substituted by 20 wt% of nanocomposite. It can be concluded that 10 wt% of microcomposite could be mixed to metakaolin for strength development and nanocomposite does not recommend to use as an additive for producing high strength of geopolymer cements.
KW - geopolymer cements
KW - Metakaolin
KW - microcomposite
KW - nanocomposite
KW - sodium waterglass
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85078433871&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/21870764.2020.1718860
DO - 10.1080/21870764.2020.1718860
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85078433871
VL - 8
SP - 149
EP - 161
JO - Journal of Asian Ceramic Societies
JF - Journal of Asian Ceramic Societies
IS - 1
ER -