Politicized trade: What Drives Withdrawal of Trade Preferences?

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Autorschaft

  • Martin Gassebner
  • Arevik Gnutzmann-Mkrtchyan

Organisationseinheiten

Externe Organisationen

  • Münchener Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Wirtschaftswissenschaft - CESifo GmbH
  • ETH Zürich
  • Belarusian Economic Research and Outreach Center (BEROC)
Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)10-13
Seitenumfang4
FachzeitschriftEconomics Letters
Jahrgang167
Frühes Online-Datum8 Dez. 2017
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - Juni 2018

Abstract

While it is well understood that industrialized countries use aid to grant political favors, little research covers alternative channels such as trade policy towards developing countries. We analyze eligibility investigations and revoking of U.S. Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) benefits to see whether political friends of the U.S. receive favorable treatment. While countries politically aligned with the U.S. are equally likely to be investigated, they are significantly less likely to have their benefits suspended.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Zitieren

Politicized trade: What Drives Withdrawal of Trade Preferences? / Gassebner, Martin; Gnutzmann-Mkrtchyan, Arevik.
in: Economics Letters, Jahrgang 167, 06.2018, S. 10-13.

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Gassebner M, Gnutzmann-Mkrtchyan A. Politicized trade: What Drives Withdrawal of Trade Preferences? Economics Letters. 2018 Jun;167:10-13. Epub 2017 Dez 8. doi: 10.3929/ethz-b-000213817, 10.1016/j.econlet.2017.12.005
Gassebner, Martin ; Gnutzmann-Mkrtchyan, Arevik. / Politicized trade : What Drives Withdrawal of Trade Preferences?. in: Economics Letters. 2018 ; Jahrgang 167. S. 10-13.
Download
@article{f653279bdaf547d9ba9742df4ef0e34f,
title = "Politicized trade: What Drives Withdrawal of Trade Preferences?",
abstract = "While it is well understood that industrialized countries use aid to grant political favors, little research covers alternative channels such as trade policy towards developing countries. We analyze eligibility investigations and revoking of U.S. Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) benefits to see whether political friends of the U.S. receive favorable treatment. While countries politically aligned with the U.S. are equally likely to be investigated, they are significantly less likely to have their benefits suspended.",
keywords = "Development, Generalized system of preferences, Trade policy, United nations general assembly",
author = "Martin Gassebner and Arevik Gnutzmann-Mkrtchyan",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2017 Elsevier B.V.",
year = "2018",
month = jun,
doi = "10.3929/ethz-b-000213817",
language = "English",
volume = "167",
pages = "10--13",
journal = "Economics Letters",
issn = "0165-1765",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Politicized trade

T2 - What Drives Withdrawal of Trade Preferences?

AU - Gassebner, Martin

AU - Gnutzmann-Mkrtchyan, Arevik

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2017 Elsevier B.V.

PY - 2018/6

Y1 - 2018/6

N2 - While it is well understood that industrialized countries use aid to grant political favors, little research covers alternative channels such as trade policy towards developing countries. We analyze eligibility investigations and revoking of U.S. Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) benefits to see whether political friends of the U.S. receive favorable treatment. While countries politically aligned with the U.S. are equally likely to be investigated, they are significantly less likely to have their benefits suspended.

AB - While it is well understood that industrialized countries use aid to grant political favors, little research covers alternative channels such as trade policy towards developing countries. We analyze eligibility investigations and revoking of U.S. Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) benefits to see whether political friends of the U.S. receive favorable treatment. While countries politically aligned with the U.S. are equally likely to be investigated, they are significantly less likely to have their benefits suspended.

KW - Development

KW - Generalized system of preferences

KW - Trade policy

KW - United nations general assembly

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85043475267&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3929/ethz-b-000213817

DO - 10.3929/ethz-b-000213817

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85043475267

VL - 167

SP - 10

EP - 13

JO - Economics Letters

JF - Economics Letters

SN - 0165-1765

ER -