Details
| Titel in Übersetzung | Planning Theory and Planning Science in Practice: Everyday Work and Prospects for Regional Planners in Germany |
|---|---|
| Originalsprache | Deutsch |
| Seiten (von - bis) | 7-17 |
| Seitenumfang | 11 |
| Fachzeitschrift | Raumforschung und Raumordnung |
| Jahrgang | 75 |
| Ausgabenummer | 1 |
| Publikationsstatus | Veröffentlicht - 2017 |
Abstract
Spatial planning challenges increasingly cross local boundaries. Statutory planning, which is organized along all different levels of government, is very complex and with its mix of informal and formal instruments diffi-cult to put into fixed categories. It acts between local self-autonomy and large-scale spatial changes. Available empirical evidence about how and whereby planning is currently done, is often unclear or weak. This article is grounded on a survey of practitioners within regional planning adminis-trations in Germany to investigate the development and use of theories and the perspectives of practitioners on these theories. Theories and their understanding prove to be as diverse as practice itself. The challenge to translate scien-tific evidence into working progresses of practitioners, the understanding of theories and the self-perception of planning practitioners has also been addressed. One main aim of this article is to show perspectives on the daily work in practice, the transfer of expertise between research and practice, the emergence and use of theories as well as the perception of planning theories by practitioners. Results re-veal a highly diverse landscape of planning practices and a duality between a vested interest in research evidence and planning theories, but also deficiencies in communication and mutual understanding.
Schlagwörter
- Planning practice, Planning research, Planning theory, Regional planning, Survey, Theory-practice transfer
ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete
- Umweltwissenschaften (insg.)
- Umweltwissenschaften (sonstige)
- Sozialwissenschaften (insg.)
- Geografie, Planung und Entwicklung
- Sozialwissenschaften (insg.)
- Urban studies
Zitieren
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTex
- RIS
in: Raumforschung und Raumordnung, Jahrgang 75, Nr. 1, 2017, S. 7-17.
Publikation: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift › Artikel › Forschung
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Planungstheorie und Planungswissenschaft im Praxistest: Arbeitsalltag und Perspektiven von Regionalplanern in Deutschland.
AU - Hellmich, Meike
AU - Lamker, Christian
AU - Lange, Linda
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - Spatial planning challenges increasingly cross local boundaries. Statutory planning, which is organized along all different levels of government, is very complex and with its mix of informal and formal instruments diffi-cult to put into fixed categories. It acts between local self-autonomy and large-scale spatial changes. Available empirical evidence about how and whereby planning is currently done, is often unclear or weak. This article is grounded on a survey of practitioners within regional planning adminis-trations in Germany to investigate the development and use of theories and the perspectives of practitioners on these theories. Theories and their understanding prove to be as diverse as practice itself. The challenge to translate scien-tific evidence into working progresses of practitioners, the understanding of theories and the self-perception of planning practitioners has also been addressed. One main aim of this article is to show perspectives on the daily work in practice, the transfer of expertise between research and practice, the emergence and use of theories as well as the perception of planning theories by practitioners. Results re-veal a highly diverse landscape of planning practices and a duality between a vested interest in research evidence and planning theories, but also deficiencies in communication and mutual understanding.
AB - Spatial planning challenges increasingly cross local boundaries. Statutory planning, which is organized along all different levels of government, is very complex and with its mix of informal and formal instruments diffi-cult to put into fixed categories. It acts between local self-autonomy and large-scale spatial changes. Available empirical evidence about how and whereby planning is currently done, is often unclear or weak. This article is grounded on a survey of practitioners within regional planning adminis-trations in Germany to investigate the development and use of theories and the perspectives of practitioners on these theories. Theories and their understanding prove to be as diverse as practice itself. The challenge to translate scien-tific evidence into working progresses of practitioners, the understanding of theories and the self-perception of planning practitioners has also been addressed. One main aim of this article is to show perspectives on the daily work in practice, the transfer of expertise between research and practice, the emergence and use of theories as well as the perception of planning theories by practitioners. Results re-veal a highly diverse landscape of planning practices and a duality between a vested interest in research evidence and planning theories, but also deficiencies in communication and mutual understanding.
KW - Planning practice
KW - Planning research
KW - Planning theory
KW - Regional planning
KW - Survey
KW - Theory-practice transfer
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85092379900&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s13147-016-0464-x
DO - 10.1007/s13147-016-0464-x
M3 - Artikel
VL - 75
SP - 7
EP - 17
JO - Raumforschung und Raumordnung
JF - Raumforschung und Raumordnung
SN - 0034-0111
IS - 1
ER -