Planung(skultur)en zwischen Wissenschaft und Praxis

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Autoren

  • Barbara Zibell
Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheDeutsch
Seiten (von - bis)90-97
Seitenumfang8
FachzeitschriftDISP
Jahrgang52
Ausgabenummer4
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 2016

Abstract

Planning culture is more than planning in terms of the activity performed (planning practice), and it is more than the object of reflection about methods and instruments, systems and institutions of spatial planning (planning theory). Based on current discourse on planning culture(s), the following article reports on experiences with planning cultures in Switzerland and Germany, leading to a position on the additional value of planning culture knowledge for further development of the discipline. In doing so, it becomes apparent that reflecting on planning culture(s) may disrupt academic thinking, resulting in a dichotomy–that is to say, the science of spatial planning on the one hand, planning practice on the other–and open up new horizons towards a contextual understanding of the sphere of spatial planning activity and decision-making.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Zitieren

Planung(skultur)en zwischen Wissenschaft und Praxis. / Zibell, Barbara.
in: DISP, Jahrgang 52, Nr. 4, 2016, S. 90-97.

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Zibell B. Planung(skultur)en zwischen Wissenschaft und Praxis. DISP. 2016;52(4):90-97. doi: 10.1080/02513625.2016.1273674
Zibell, Barbara. / Planung(skultur)en zwischen Wissenschaft und Praxis. in: DISP. 2016 ; Jahrgang 52, Nr. 4. S. 90-97.
Download
@article{3d857db1d3a44d7ca9fd1fa83863b1a4,
title = "Planung(skultur)en zwischen Wissenschaft und Praxis",
abstract = "Planning culture is more than planning in terms of the activity performed (planning practice), and it is more than the object of reflection about methods and instruments, systems and institutions of spatial planning (planning theory). Based on current discourse on planning culture(s), the following article reports on experiences with planning cultures in Switzerland and Germany, leading to a position on the additional value of planning culture knowledge for further development of the discipline. In doing so, it becomes apparent that reflecting on planning culture(s) may disrupt academic thinking, resulting in a dichotomy–that is to say, the science of spatial planning on the one hand, planning practice on the other–and open up new horizons towards a contextual understanding of the sphere of spatial planning activity and decision-making.",
author = "Barbara Zibell",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2017 ETH–Eidgen{\"o}ssiche Technische Hochschule Z{\"u}rich.",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1080/02513625.2016.1273674",
language = "Deutsch",
volume = "52",
pages = "90--97",
journal = "DISP",
issn = "0251-3625",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Planung(skultur)en zwischen Wissenschaft und Praxis

AU - Zibell, Barbara

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2017 ETH–Eidgenössiche Technische Hochschule Zürich.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Planning culture is more than planning in terms of the activity performed (planning practice), and it is more than the object of reflection about methods and instruments, systems and institutions of spatial planning (planning theory). Based on current discourse on planning culture(s), the following article reports on experiences with planning cultures in Switzerland and Germany, leading to a position on the additional value of planning culture knowledge for further development of the discipline. In doing so, it becomes apparent that reflecting on planning culture(s) may disrupt academic thinking, resulting in a dichotomy–that is to say, the science of spatial planning on the one hand, planning practice on the other–and open up new horizons towards a contextual understanding of the sphere of spatial planning activity and decision-making.

AB - Planning culture is more than planning in terms of the activity performed (planning practice), and it is more than the object of reflection about methods and instruments, systems and institutions of spatial planning (planning theory). Based on current discourse on planning culture(s), the following article reports on experiences with planning cultures in Switzerland and Germany, leading to a position on the additional value of planning culture knowledge for further development of the discipline. In doing so, it becomes apparent that reflecting on planning culture(s) may disrupt academic thinking, resulting in a dichotomy–that is to say, the science of spatial planning on the one hand, planning practice on the other–and open up new horizons towards a contextual understanding of the sphere of spatial planning activity and decision-making.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85009080858&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/02513625.2016.1273674

DO - 10.1080/02513625.2016.1273674

M3 - Artikel

AN - SCOPUS:85009080858

VL - 52

SP - 90

EP - 97

JO - DISP

JF - DISP

SN - 0251-3625

IS - 4

ER -