Piezoelectric transducer design via multiobjective optimization

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Autoren

  • B. Fu
  • T. Hemsel
  • J. Wallaschek

Externe Organisationen

  • Sichuan University
  • Universität Paderborn
Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)e747-e752
FachzeitschriftUltrasonics
Jahrgang44
AusgabenummerSUPPL.
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 22 Dez. 2006
Extern publiziertJa

Abstract

The design of piezoelectric transducers is usually based on single-objective optimization only. In most practical applications of piezoelectric transducers, however, there exist multiple design objectives that often are contradictory to each other by their very nature. It is impossible to find a solution at which each objective function gets its optimal value simultaneously. Our design approach is to first find a set of Pareto-optimal solutions, which can be considered to be best compromises among multiple design objectives. Among these Pareto-optimal solutions, the designer can then select the one solution which he considers to be the best one. In this paper we investigate the optimal design of a Langevin transducer. The design problem is formulated mathematically as a constrained multiobjective optimization problem. The maximum vibration amplitude and the minimum electrical input power are considered as optimization objectives. Design variables involve continuous variables (dimensions of the transducer) and discrete variables (the number of piezoelectric rings and material types). In order to formulate the optimization problem, the behavior of piezoelectric transducers is modeled using the transfer matrix method based on analytical models. Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms are applied in the optimization process and a set of Pareto-optimal designs is calculated. The optimized results are analyzed and the preferred design is determined.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Zitieren

Piezoelectric transducer design via multiobjective optimization. / Fu, B.; Hemsel, T.; Wallaschek, J.
in: Ultrasonics, Jahrgang 44, Nr. SUPPL., 22.12.2006, S. e747-e752.

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Fu, B, Hemsel, T & Wallaschek, J 2006, 'Piezoelectric transducer design via multiobjective optimization', Ultrasonics, Jg. 44, Nr. SUPPL., S. e747-e752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2006.05.087
Fu B, Hemsel T, Wallaschek J. Piezoelectric transducer design via multiobjective optimization. Ultrasonics. 2006 Dez 22;44(SUPPL.):e747-e752. doi: 10.1016/j.ultras.2006.05.087
Fu, B. ; Hemsel, T. ; Wallaschek, J. / Piezoelectric transducer design via multiobjective optimization. in: Ultrasonics. 2006 ; Jahrgang 44, Nr. SUPPL. S. e747-e752.
Download
@article{2cb125a79a704e1088e90338c27aa68c,
title = "Piezoelectric transducer design via multiobjective optimization",
abstract = "The design of piezoelectric transducers is usually based on single-objective optimization only. In most practical applications of piezoelectric transducers, however, there exist multiple design objectives that often are contradictory to each other by their very nature. It is impossible to find a solution at which each objective function gets its optimal value simultaneously. Our design approach is to first find a set of Pareto-optimal solutions, which can be considered to be best compromises among multiple design objectives. Among these Pareto-optimal solutions, the designer can then select the one solution which he considers to be the best one. In this paper we investigate the optimal design of a Langevin transducer. The design problem is formulated mathematically as a constrained multiobjective optimization problem. The maximum vibration amplitude and the minimum electrical input power are considered as optimization objectives. Design variables involve continuous variables (dimensions of the transducer) and discrete variables (the number of piezoelectric rings and material types). In order to formulate the optimization problem, the behavior of piezoelectric transducers is modeled using the transfer matrix method based on analytical models. Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms are applied in the optimization process and a set of Pareto-optimal designs is calculated. The optimized results are analyzed and the preferred design is determined.",
keywords = "Multiobjective optimization, Pareto-optimality, Piezoelectric transducer",
author = "B. Fu and T. Hemsel and J. Wallaschek",
note = "Funding Information: This work was supported by the PaSCo-Graduiertenkolleg, Heinz Nixdorf Institut and China Scholarship Council. Copyright: Copyright 2008 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.",
year = "2006",
month = dec,
day = "22",
doi = "10.1016/j.ultras.2006.05.087",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "e747--e752",
journal = "Ultrasonics",
issn = "0041-624X",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "SUPPL.",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Piezoelectric transducer design via multiobjective optimization

AU - Fu, B.

AU - Hemsel, T.

AU - Wallaschek, J.

N1 - Funding Information: This work was supported by the PaSCo-Graduiertenkolleg, Heinz Nixdorf Institut and China Scholarship Council. Copyright: Copyright 2008 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

PY - 2006/12/22

Y1 - 2006/12/22

N2 - The design of piezoelectric transducers is usually based on single-objective optimization only. In most practical applications of piezoelectric transducers, however, there exist multiple design objectives that often are contradictory to each other by their very nature. It is impossible to find a solution at which each objective function gets its optimal value simultaneously. Our design approach is to first find a set of Pareto-optimal solutions, which can be considered to be best compromises among multiple design objectives. Among these Pareto-optimal solutions, the designer can then select the one solution which he considers to be the best one. In this paper we investigate the optimal design of a Langevin transducer. The design problem is formulated mathematically as a constrained multiobjective optimization problem. The maximum vibration amplitude and the minimum electrical input power are considered as optimization objectives. Design variables involve continuous variables (dimensions of the transducer) and discrete variables (the number of piezoelectric rings and material types). In order to formulate the optimization problem, the behavior of piezoelectric transducers is modeled using the transfer matrix method based on analytical models. Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms are applied in the optimization process and a set of Pareto-optimal designs is calculated. The optimized results are analyzed and the preferred design is determined.

AB - The design of piezoelectric transducers is usually based on single-objective optimization only. In most practical applications of piezoelectric transducers, however, there exist multiple design objectives that often are contradictory to each other by their very nature. It is impossible to find a solution at which each objective function gets its optimal value simultaneously. Our design approach is to first find a set of Pareto-optimal solutions, which can be considered to be best compromises among multiple design objectives. Among these Pareto-optimal solutions, the designer can then select the one solution which he considers to be the best one. In this paper we investigate the optimal design of a Langevin transducer. The design problem is formulated mathematically as a constrained multiobjective optimization problem. The maximum vibration amplitude and the minimum electrical input power are considered as optimization objectives. Design variables involve continuous variables (dimensions of the transducer) and discrete variables (the number of piezoelectric rings and material types). In order to formulate the optimization problem, the behavior of piezoelectric transducers is modeled using the transfer matrix method based on analytical models. Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms are applied in the optimization process and a set of Pareto-optimal designs is calculated. The optimized results are analyzed and the preferred design is determined.

KW - Multiobjective optimization

KW - Pareto-optimality

KW - Piezoelectric transducer

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33845715388&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ultras.2006.05.087

DO - 10.1016/j.ultras.2006.05.087

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33845715388

VL - 44

SP - e747-e752

JO - Ultrasonics

JF - Ultrasonics

SN - 0041-624X

IS - SUPPL.

ER -