Phase field modeling and computer implementation: A review

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftÜbersichtsarbeitForschungPeer-Review

Autoren

  • X Zhuang
  • S Zhou
  • GD Huynh
  • T Rabczuk

Organisationseinheiten

Externe Organisationen

  • Tongji University
  • Bauhaus-Universität Weimar
Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Aufsatznummer108234
Seitenumfang1
FachzeitschriftEngineering fracture mechanics
Jahrgang262
Frühes Online-Datum17 Jan. 2022
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 1 März 2022

Abstract

This paper presents an overview of the theories and computer implementation aspects of phase field models (PFM) of fracture. The advantage of PFM over discontinuous approaches to fracture is that PFM can elegantly simulate complicated fracture processes including fracture initiation, propagation, coalescence, and branching by using only a scalar field, the phase field. In addition, fracture is a natural outcome of the simulation and obtained through the solution of an additional differential equation related to the phase field. No extra fracture criteria are needed and an explicit representation of a crack surface as well as complex track crack procedures are avoided in PFM for fracture, which in turn dramatically facilitates the implementation. The PFM is thermodynamically consistent and can be easily extended to multi-physics problem by ‘changing’ the energy functional accordingly. Besides an overview of different PFMs, we also present comparative numerical benchmark examples to show the capability of PFMs.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Zitieren

Phase field modeling and computer implementation: A review. / Zhuang, X; Zhou, S; Huynh, GD et al.
in: Engineering fracture mechanics, Jahrgang 262, 108234, 01.03.2022.

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftÜbersichtsarbeitForschungPeer-Review

Zhuang X, Zhou S, Huynh GD, Rabczuk T. Phase field modeling and computer implementation: A review. Engineering fracture mechanics. 2022 Mär 1;262:108234. Epub 2022 Jan 17. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2309.03996, 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.108234
Zhuang, X ; Zhou, S ; Huynh, GD et al. / Phase field modeling and computer implementation : A review. in: Engineering fracture mechanics. 2022 ; Jahrgang 262.
Download
@article{54a5232966aa4081932fe82502126560,
title = "Phase field modeling and computer implementation: A review",
abstract = "This paper presents an overview of the theories and computer implementation aspects of phase field models (PFM) of fracture. The advantage of PFM over discontinuous approaches to fracture is that PFM can elegantly simulate complicated fracture processes including fracture initiation, propagation, coalescence, and branching by using only a scalar field, the phase field. In addition, fracture is a natural outcome of the simulation and obtained through the solution of an additional differential equation related to the phase field. No extra fracture criteria are needed and an explicit representation of a crack surface as well as complex track crack procedures are avoided in PFM for fracture, which in turn dramatically facilitates the implementation. The PFM is thermodynamically consistent and can be easily extended to multi-physics problem by {\textquoteleft}changing{\textquoteright} the energy functional accordingly. Besides an overview of different PFMs, we also present comparative numerical benchmark examples to show the capability of PFMs.",
keywords = "Brittle fracture, Computer implementation, Finite element method, Hydraulic fracture, Phase field",
author = "X Zhuang and S Zhou and GD Huynh and T Rabczuk",
note = "Funding Information: The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support of DFG (German Research Foundation) SB-2016-ZH 459/3-1 and RISE-project BESTOFRAC ( 734370 ).",
year = "2022",
month = mar,
day = "1",
doi = "10.48550/arXiv.2309.03996",
language = "English",
volume = "262",
journal = "Engineering fracture mechanics",
issn = "0013-7944",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Phase field modeling and computer implementation

T2 - A review

AU - Zhuang, X

AU - Zhou, S

AU - Huynh, GD

AU - Rabczuk, T

N1 - Funding Information: The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support of DFG (German Research Foundation) SB-2016-ZH 459/3-1 and RISE-project BESTOFRAC ( 734370 ).

PY - 2022/3/1

Y1 - 2022/3/1

N2 - This paper presents an overview of the theories and computer implementation aspects of phase field models (PFM) of fracture. The advantage of PFM over discontinuous approaches to fracture is that PFM can elegantly simulate complicated fracture processes including fracture initiation, propagation, coalescence, and branching by using only a scalar field, the phase field. In addition, fracture is a natural outcome of the simulation and obtained through the solution of an additional differential equation related to the phase field. No extra fracture criteria are needed and an explicit representation of a crack surface as well as complex track crack procedures are avoided in PFM for fracture, which in turn dramatically facilitates the implementation. The PFM is thermodynamically consistent and can be easily extended to multi-physics problem by ‘changing’ the energy functional accordingly. Besides an overview of different PFMs, we also present comparative numerical benchmark examples to show the capability of PFMs.

AB - This paper presents an overview of the theories and computer implementation aspects of phase field models (PFM) of fracture. The advantage of PFM over discontinuous approaches to fracture is that PFM can elegantly simulate complicated fracture processes including fracture initiation, propagation, coalescence, and branching by using only a scalar field, the phase field. In addition, fracture is a natural outcome of the simulation and obtained through the solution of an additional differential equation related to the phase field. No extra fracture criteria are needed and an explicit representation of a crack surface as well as complex track crack procedures are avoided in PFM for fracture, which in turn dramatically facilitates the implementation. The PFM is thermodynamically consistent and can be easily extended to multi-physics problem by ‘changing’ the energy functional accordingly. Besides an overview of different PFMs, we also present comparative numerical benchmark examples to show the capability of PFMs.

KW - Brittle fracture

KW - Computer implementation

KW - Finite element method

KW - Hydraulic fracture

KW - Phase field

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85124103280&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.48550/arXiv.2309.03996

DO - 10.48550/arXiv.2309.03996

M3 - Review article

VL - 262

JO - Engineering fracture mechanics

JF - Engineering fracture mechanics

SN - 0013-7944

M1 - 108234

ER -