Details
Originalsprache | Englisch |
---|---|
Aufsatznummer | e03138 |
Seitenumfang | 22 |
Fachzeitschrift | Case Studies in Construction Materials |
Jahrgang | 20 |
Frühes Online-Datum | 7 Apr. 2024 |
Publikationsstatus | Veröffentlicht - Juli 2024 |
Abstract
Shield tunnel segmental joints are traditionally vulnerable, limited by their tensile capacity and susceptibility to cracking. Engineered Cementitious Composites (ECC) offer a promising solution due to their superior tensile strength, exceptional crack resistance, and remarkable toughness. However, the application of ECC in tunnel segment joints remains unexplored. To address this gap, this paper conducted comprehensive full-scale tests of ECC segmental joints versus ordinary reinforced concrete (RC) segmental joints. It investigated mechanical responses including material behavior, deflection, joint action, bolt strain, crack development, and failure modes. Results revealed that: (1) ECC joints provided a 33.97 % higher stable bearing capacity and a 50 % increase in initial cracking strength compared to RC joints. (2) ECC joints excelled in crack control, maintaining crack widths below 0.2 mm, while RC joints experienced significant cracking with widths exceeding 1 mm. (3) In terms of toughness, ECC joints surpassed RC by 66 % in the elastic stage and 123 % in the normal serviceability stage, with 96 % higher ductility. (4) ECC joints significantly outperformed RC joints in bolt stress uniformity and concentration, achieving a 43.21 % reduction in average bolt stress. (5) Regarding multi-scale mechanical effects, ECC joints increased the toughness and strength advantage over RC by more than 45 % in the elastic phase. These results reveal the potential of ECC in significantly enhancing the durability and resilience of shield tunnels, particularly in harsh environments subjected to high ground stress or seismic activities.
ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete
- Werkstoffwissenschaften (insg.)
- Werkstoffwissenschaften (sonstige)
Zitieren
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTex
- RIS
in: Case Studies in Construction Materials, Jahrgang 20, e03138, 07.2024.
Publikation: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift › Artikel › Forschung › Peer-Review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Performance of Engineered Cementitious Composites (ECC) in shield tunnel segmental joints
T2 - A comparative study with ordinary reinforced concrete
AU - Cai, Minjin
AU - Zhu, Hehua
AU - Chen, Qing
AU - Rabczuk, Timon
AU - Zhuang, Xiaoying
N1 - Funding Information: The authors gratefully acknowledge to the project 52278411 and 22JC14041001, which are supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China and Shanghai Science and Technology Innovation Action.
PY - 2024/7
Y1 - 2024/7
N2 - Shield tunnel segmental joints are traditionally vulnerable, limited by their tensile capacity and susceptibility to cracking. Engineered Cementitious Composites (ECC) offer a promising solution due to their superior tensile strength, exceptional crack resistance, and remarkable toughness. However, the application of ECC in tunnel segment joints remains unexplored. To address this gap, this paper conducted comprehensive full-scale tests of ECC segmental joints versus ordinary reinforced concrete (RC) segmental joints. It investigated mechanical responses including material behavior, deflection, joint action, bolt strain, crack development, and failure modes. Results revealed that: (1) ECC joints provided a 33.97 % higher stable bearing capacity and a 50 % increase in initial cracking strength compared to RC joints. (2) ECC joints excelled in crack control, maintaining crack widths below 0.2 mm, while RC joints experienced significant cracking with widths exceeding 1 mm. (3) In terms of toughness, ECC joints surpassed RC by 66 % in the elastic stage and 123 % in the normal serviceability stage, with 96 % higher ductility. (4) ECC joints significantly outperformed RC joints in bolt stress uniformity and concentration, achieving a 43.21 % reduction in average bolt stress. (5) Regarding multi-scale mechanical effects, ECC joints increased the toughness and strength advantage over RC by more than 45 % in the elastic phase. These results reveal the potential of ECC in significantly enhancing the durability and resilience of shield tunnels, particularly in harsh environments subjected to high ground stress or seismic activities.
AB - Shield tunnel segmental joints are traditionally vulnerable, limited by their tensile capacity and susceptibility to cracking. Engineered Cementitious Composites (ECC) offer a promising solution due to their superior tensile strength, exceptional crack resistance, and remarkable toughness. However, the application of ECC in tunnel segment joints remains unexplored. To address this gap, this paper conducted comprehensive full-scale tests of ECC segmental joints versus ordinary reinforced concrete (RC) segmental joints. It investigated mechanical responses including material behavior, deflection, joint action, bolt strain, crack development, and failure modes. Results revealed that: (1) ECC joints provided a 33.97 % higher stable bearing capacity and a 50 % increase in initial cracking strength compared to RC joints. (2) ECC joints excelled in crack control, maintaining crack widths below 0.2 mm, while RC joints experienced significant cracking with widths exceeding 1 mm. (3) In terms of toughness, ECC joints surpassed RC by 66 % in the elastic stage and 123 % in the normal serviceability stage, with 96 % higher ductility. (4) ECC joints significantly outperformed RC joints in bolt stress uniformity and concentration, achieving a 43.21 % reduction in average bolt stress. (5) Regarding multi-scale mechanical effects, ECC joints increased the toughness and strength advantage over RC by more than 45 % in the elastic phase. These results reveal the potential of ECC in significantly enhancing the durability and resilience of shield tunnels, particularly in harsh environments subjected to high ground stress or seismic activities.
KW - Cracking resistance
KW - Engineered Cementitious Composites
KW - Joint ductility
KW - Joint toughness
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85190943296&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e03138
DO - 10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e03138
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85190943296
VL - 20
JO - Case Studies in Construction Materials
JF - Case Studies in Construction Materials
SN - 2214-5095
M1 - e03138
ER -