Perceived tax audit aggressiveness, tax control frameworks and tax planning: an empirical analysis

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Autoren

  • Kay Blaufus
  • Jakob Reineke
  • Ilko Trenn
Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)509-557
Seitenumfang49
FachzeitschriftJournal of Business Economics
Jahrgang93
Ausgabenummer3
Frühes Online-Datum13 Dez. 2022
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - Apr. 2023

Abstract

This paper examines whether a perceived increase in tax audit aggressiveness is associated with lower tax planning effort and a higher quality of internal tax control frameworks. Using survey data on corporate tax functions from approximately 200 firms from different countries, contrary to expectations, we find that neither internal nor external resources devoted to tax planning are lower for firms that perceive an increase in tax audit aggressiveness. Nevertheless, for these firms, we find a positive association with the quality of their tax control framework and their investments in the reputation management and communication skills of their tax department staff. In line with this, we find that an increase in perceived audit aggressiveness is directly (indirectly) associated with an increase in resources allocated to the tax function “controversy and audit defense” (“risk management and governance”). In addition, our results show a positive relationship between the quality of the tax control framework and the need for comprehensive improvements in human capital and internal processes, suggesting that the tax control framework affects the firms' perceptions of their tax capabilities and drives organizational changes. Overall, these findings are in line with the rationale that an increase in audit aggressiveness changes the costs of compliance errors such that firms improve the quality of their tax control framework to reduce future errors. In contrast, it remains unclear whether tax audit aggressiveness actually changes tax planning behavior, as we find no negative association with the firms' investment in tax planning.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Zitieren

Perceived tax audit aggressiveness, tax control frameworks and tax planning: an empirical analysis. / Blaufus, Kay; Reineke, Jakob; Trenn, Ilko.
in: Journal of Business Economics, Jahrgang 93, Nr. 3, 04.2023, S. 509-557.

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Blaufus, K, Reineke, J & Trenn, I 2023, 'Perceived tax audit aggressiveness, tax control frameworks and tax planning: an empirical analysis', Journal of Business Economics, Jg. 93, Nr. 3, S. 509-557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-022-01116-6
Blaufus, K., Reineke, J., & Trenn, I. (2023). Perceived tax audit aggressiveness, tax control frameworks and tax planning: an empirical analysis. Journal of Business Economics, 93(3), 509-557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-022-01116-6
Blaufus K, Reineke J, Trenn I. Perceived tax audit aggressiveness, tax control frameworks and tax planning: an empirical analysis. Journal of Business Economics. 2023 Apr;93(3):509-557. Epub 2022 Dez 13. doi: 10.1007/s11573-022-01116-6
Blaufus, Kay ; Reineke, Jakob ; Trenn, Ilko. / Perceived tax audit aggressiveness, tax control frameworks and tax planning : an empirical analysis. in: Journal of Business Economics. 2023 ; Jahrgang 93, Nr. 3. S. 509-557.
Download
@article{91b214ec08794de1b9abc220c3102627,
title = "Perceived tax audit aggressiveness, tax control frameworks and tax planning: an empirical analysis",
abstract = "This paper examines whether a perceived increase in tax audit aggressiveness is associated with lower tax planning effort and a higher quality of internal tax control frameworks. Using survey data on corporate tax functions from approximately 200 firms from different countries, contrary to expectations, we find that neither internal nor external resources devoted to tax planning are lower for firms that perceive an increase in tax audit aggressiveness. Nevertheless, for these firms, we find a positive association with the quality of their tax control framework and their investments in the reputation management and communication skills of their tax department staff. In line with this, we find that an increase in perceived audit aggressiveness is directly (indirectly) associated with an increase in resources allocated to the tax function “controversy and audit defense” (“risk management and governance”). In addition, our results show a positive relationship between the quality of the tax control framework and the need for comprehensive improvements in human capital and internal processes, suggesting that the tax control framework affects the firms' perceptions of their tax capabilities and drives organizational changes. Overall, these findings are in line with the rationale that an increase in audit aggressiveness changes the costs of compliance errors such that firms improve the quality of their tax control framework to reduce future errors. In contrast, it remains unclear whether tax audit aggressiveness actually changes tax planning behavior, as we find no negative association with the firms' investment in tax planning.",
keywords = "Tax avoidance, Tax compliance management, Tax control framework, Tax enforcement",
author = "Kay Blaufus and Jakob Reineke and Ilko Trenn",
note = "Funding Information: We thank Jochen Hundsdoerfer (editor) and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments. K. Blaufus gratefully acknowledges financial support from KPMG Germany.",
year = "2023",
month = apr,
doi = "10.1007/s11573-022-01116-6",
language = "English",
volume = "93",
pages = "509--557",
number = "3",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Perceived tax audit aggressiveness, tax control frameworks and tax planning

T2 - an empirical analysis

AU - Blaufus, Kay

AU - Reineke, Jakob

AU - Trenn, Ilko

N1 - Funding Information: We thank Jochen Hundsdoerfer (editor) and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments. K. Blaufus gratefully acknowledges financial support from KPMG Germany.

PY - 2023/4

Y1 - 2023/4

N2 - This paper examines whether a perceived increase in tax audit aggressiveness is associated with lower tax planning effort and a higher quality of internal tax control frameworks. Using survey data on corporate tax functions from approximately 200 firms from different countries, contrary to expectations, we find that neither internal nor external resources devoted to tax planning are lower for firms that perceive an increase in tax audit aggressiveness. Nevertheless, for these firms, we find a positive association with the quality of their tax control framework and their investments in the reputation management and communication skills of their tax department staff. In line with this, we find that an increase in perceived audit aggressiveness is directly (indirectly) associated with an increase in resources allocated to the tax function “controversy and audit defense” (“risk management and governance”). In addition, our results show a positive relationship between the quality of the tax control framework and the need for comprehensive improvements in human capital and internal processes, suggesting that the tax control framework affects the firms' perceptions of their tax capabilities and drives organizational changes. Overall, these findings are in line with the rationale that an increase in audit aggressiveness changes the costs of compliance errors such that firms improve the quality of their tax control framework to reduce future errors. In contrast, it remains unclear whether tax audit aggressiveness actually changes tax planning behavior, as we find no negative association with the firms' investment in tax planning.

AB - This paper examines whether a perceived increase in tax audit aggressiveness is associated with lower tax planning effort and a higher quality of internal tax control frameworks. Using survey data on corporate tax functions from approximately 200 firms from different countries, contrary to expectations, we find that neither internal nor external resources devoted to tax planning are lower for firms that perceive an increase in tax audit aggressiveness. Nevertheless, for these firms, we find a positive association with the quality of their tax control framework and their investments in the reputation management and communication skills of their tax department staff. In line with this, we find that an increase in perceived audit aggressiveness is directly (indirectly) associated with an increase in resources allocated to the tax function “controversy and audit defense” (“risk management and governance”). In addition, our results show a positive relationship between the quality of the tax control framework and the need for comprehensive improvements in human capital and internal processes, suggesting that the tax control framework affects the firms' perceptions of their tax capabilities and drives organizational changes. Overall, these findings are in line with the rationale that an increase in audit aggressiveness changes the costs of compliance errors such that firms improve the quality of their tax control framework to reduce future errors. In contrast, it remains unclear whether tax audit aggressiveness actually changes tax planning behavior, as we find no negative association with the firms' investment in tax planning.

KW - Tax avoidance

KW - Tax compliance management

KW - Tax control framework

KW - Tax enforcement

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85143897656&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11573-022-01116-6

DO - 10.1007/s11573-022-01116-6

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85143897656

VL - 93

SP - 509

EP - 557

JO - Journal of Business Economics

JF - Journal of Business Economics

SN - 0044-2372

IS - 3

ER -