Peat: home to novel syntrophic species that feed acetate- and hydrogen-scavenging methanogens

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Autoren

Organisationseinheiten

Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)1954-1966
Seitenumfang13
FachzeitschriftISME J
Jahrgang10
Ausgabenummer8
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 1 Aug. 2016

Abstract

Syntrophic bacteria drive the anaerobic degradation of certain fermentation products (e.g., butyrate, ethanol, propionate) to intermediary substrates (e.g., H 2, formate, acetate) that yield methane at the ecosystem level. However, little is known about the in situ activities and identities of these syntrophs in peatlands, ecosystems that produce significant quantities of methane. The consumption of butyrate, ethanol or propionate by anoxic peat slurries at 5 and 15 °C yielded methane and CO 2 as the sole accumulating products, indicating that the intermediates H 2, formate and acetate were scavenged effectively by syntrophic methanogenic consortia. 16S rRNA stable isotope probing identified novel species/strains of Pelobacter and Syntrophomonas that syntrophically oxidized ethanol and butyrate, respectively. Propionate was syntrophically oxidized by novel species of Syntrophobacter and Smithella, genera that use different propionate-oxidizing pathways. Taxa not known for a syntrophic metabolism may have been involved in the oxidation of butyrate (Telmatospirillum-related) and propionate (unclassified Bacteroidetes and unclassified Fibrobacteres). Gibbs free energies (ΔGs) for syntrophic oxidations of ethanol and butyrate were more favorable than ΔGs for syntrophic oxidation of propionate. As a result of the thermodynamic constraints, acetate transiently accumulated in ethanol and butyrate treatments but not in propionate treatments. Aceticlastic methanogens (Methanosarcina, Methanosaeta) appeared to outnumber hydrogenotrophic methanogens (Methanocella, Methanoregula), reinforcing the likely importance of aceticlastic methanogenesis to the overall production of methane. ΔGs for acetogenesis from H 2 to CO 2 approximated to -20 kJ mol -1 when acetate concentrations were low, indicating that acetogens may have contributed to the flow of carbon and reductant towards methane.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Zitieren

Peat: home to novel syntrophic species that feed acetate- and hydrogen-scavenging methanogens. / Schmidt, O.; Hink, L.; Horn, M. A. et al.
in: ISME J, Jahrgang 10, Nr. 8, 01.08.2016, S. 1954-1966.

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Schmidt O, Hink L, Horn MA, Drake HL. Peat: home to novel syntrophic species that feed acetate- and hydrogen-scavenging methanogens. ISME J. 2016 Aug 1;10(8):1954-1966. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2015.256
Download
@article{aca8f80e34f0490a861097ead6aafa5d,
title = "Peat: home to novel syntrophic species that feed acetate- and hydrogen-scavenging methanogens",
abstract = "Syntrophic bacteria drive the anaerobic degradation of certain fermentation products (e.g., butyrate, ethanol, propionate) to intermediary substrates (e.g., H 2, formate, acetate) that yield methane at the ecosystem level. However, little is known about the in situ activities and identities of these syntrophs in peatlands, ecosystems that produce significant quantities of methane. The consumption of butyrate, ethanol or propionate by anoxic peat slurries at 5 and 15 °C yielded methane and CO 2 as the sole accumulating products, indicating that the intermediates H 2, formate and acetate were scavenged effectively by syntrophic methanogenic consortia. 16S rRNA stable isotope probing identified novel species/strains of Pelobacter and Syntrophomonas that syntrophically oxidized ethanol and butyrate, respectively. Propionate was syntrophically oxidized by novel species of Syntrophobacter and Smithella, genera that use different propionate-oxidizing pathways. Taxa not known for a syntrophic metabolism may have been involved in the oxidation of butyrate (Telmatospirillum-related) and propionate (unclassified Bacteroidetes and unclassified Fibrobacteres). Gibbs free energies (ΔGs) for syntrophic oxidations of ethanol and butyrate were more favorable than ΔGs for syntrophic oxidation of propionate. As a result of the thermodynamic constraints, acetate transiently accumulated in ethanol and butyrate treatments but not in propionate treatments. Aceticlastic methanogens (Methanosarcina, Methanosaeta) appeared to outnumber hydrogenotrophic methanogens (Methanocella, Methanoregula), reinforcing the likely importance of aceticlastic methanogenesis to the overall production of methane. ΔGs for acetogenesis from H 2 to CO 2 approximated to -20 kJ mol -1 when acetate concentrations were low, indicating that acetogens may have contributed to the flow of carbon and reductant towards methane.",
author = "O. Schmidt and L. Hink and Horn, {M. A.} and Drake, {H. L.}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2016 International Society for Microbial Ecology All rights reserved. Copyright: Copyright 2017 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.",
year = "2016",
month = aug,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1038/ismej.2015.256",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "1954--1966",
journal = "ISME J",
issn = "1751-7362",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "8",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Peat: home to novel syntrophic species that feed acetate- and hydrogen-scavenging methanogens

AU - Schmidt, O.

AU - Hink, L.

AU - Horn, M. A.

AU - Drake, H. L.

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2016 International Society for Microbial Ecology All rights reserved. Copyright: Copyright 2017 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

PY - 2016/8/1

Y1 - 2016/8/1

N2 - Syntrophic bacteria drive the anaerobic degradation of certain fermentation products (e.g., butyrate, ethanol, propionate) to intermediary substrates (e.g., H 2, formate, acetate) that yield methane at the ecosystem level. However, little is known about the in situ activities and identities of these syntrophs in peatlands, ecosystems that produce significant quantities of methane. The consumption of butyrate, ethanol or propionate by anoxic peat slurries at 5 and 15 °C yielded methane and CO 2 as the sole accumulating products, indicating that the intermediates H 2, formate and acetate were scavenged effectively by syntrophic methanogenic consortia. 16S rRNA stable isotope probing identified novel species/strains of Pelobacter and Syntrophomonas that syntrophically oxidized ethanol and butyrate, respectively. Propionate was syntrophically oxidized by novel species of Syntrophobacter and Smithella, genera that use different propionate-oxidizing pathways. Taxa not known for a syntrophic metabolism may have been involved in the oxidation of butyrate (Telmatospirillum-related) and propionate (unclassified Bacteroidetes and unclassified Fibrobacteres). Gibbs free energies (ΔGs) for syntrophic oxidations of ethanol and butyrate were more favorable than ΔGs for syntrophic oxidation of propionate. As a result of the thermodynamic constraints, acetate transiently accumulated in ethanol and butyrate treatments but not in propionate treatments. Aceticlastic methanogens (Methanosarcina, Methanosaeta) appeared to outnumber hydrogenotrophic methanogens (Methanocella, Methanoregula), reinforcing the likely importance of aceticlastic methanogenesis to the overall production of methane. ΔGs for acetogenesis from H 2 to CO 2 approximated to -20 kJ mol -1 when acetate concentrations were low, indicating that acetogens may have contributed to the flow of carbon and reductant towards methane.

AB - Syntrophic bacteria drive the anaerobic degradation of certain fermentation products (e.g., butyrate, ethanol, propionate) to intermediary substrates (e.g., H 2, formate, acetate) that yield methane at the ecosystem level. However, little is known about the in situ activities and identities of these syntrophs in peatlands, ecosystems that produce significant quantities of methane. The consumption of butyrate, ethanol or propionate by anoxic peat slurries at 5 and 15 °C yielded methane and CO 2 as the sole accumulating products, indicating that the intermediates H 2, formate and acetate were scavenged effectively by syntrophic methanogenic consortia. 16S rRNA stable isotope probing identified novel species/strains of Pelobacter and Syntrophomonas that syntrophically oxidized ethanol and butyrate, respectively. Propionate was syntrophically oxidized by novel species of Syntrophobacter and Smithella, genera that use different propionate-oxidizing pathways. Taxa not known for a syntrophic metabolism may have been involved in the oxidation of butyrate (Telmatospirillum-related) and propionate (unclassified Bacteroidetes and unclassified Fibrobacteres). Gibbs free energies (ΔGs) for syntrophic oxidations of ethanol and butyrate were more favorable than ΔGs for syntrophic oxidation of propionate. As a result of the thermodynamic constraints, acetate transiently accumulated in ethanol and butyrate treatments but not in propionate treatments. Aceticlastic methanogens (Methanosarcina, Methanosaeta) appeared to outnumber hydrogenotrophic methanogens (Methanocella, Methanoregula), reinforcing the likely importance of aceticlastic methanogenesis to the overall production of methane. ΔGs for acetogenesis from H 2 to CO 2 approximated to -20 kJ mol -1 when acetate concentrations were low, indicating that acetogens may have contributed to the flow of carbon and reductant towards methane.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84954453031&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/ismej.2015.256

DO - 10.1038/ismej.2015.256

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 1954

EP - 1966

JO - ISME J

JF - ISME J

SN - 1751-7362

IS - 8

ER -

Von denselben Autoren