Loading [MathJax]/extensions/tex2jax.js

Patterns of Argumentation Strategies across Topics

Publikation: Beitrag in Buch/Bericht/Sammelwerk/KonferenzbandAufsatz in KonferenzbandForschungPeer-Review

Autorschaft

Externe Organisationen

  • Bauhaus-Universität Weimar

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Titel des SammelwerksProceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
Seiten1351-1357
Seitenumfang7
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - Aug. 2017
Extern publiziertJa
Veranstaltung2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing - Copenhagen, Dänemark
Dauer: 7 Sept. 201711 Sept. 2017

Abstract

This paper presents an analysis of argumentation strategies in news editorials within and across topics. Given nearly 29,000 argumentative editorials from the New York Times, we develop two machine learning models, one for determining an editorial’s topic, and one for identifying evidence types in the editorial. Based on the distribution and structure of the identified types, we analyze the usage patterns of argumentation strategies among 12 different topics. We detect several common patterns that provide insights into the manifestation of argumentation strategies. Also, our experiments reveal clear correlations between the topics and the detected patterns.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Zitieren

Patterns of Argumentation Strategies across Topics. / Al-Khatib, Khalid; Wachsmuth, Henning; Hagen, Matthias et al.
Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2017. S. 1351-1357.

Publikation: Beitrag in Buch/Bericht/Sammelwerk/KonferenzbandAufsatz in KonferenzbandForschungPeer-Review

Al-Khatib, K, Wachsmuth, H, Hagen, M & Stein, B 2017, Patterns of Argumentation Strategies across Topics. in Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. S. 1351-1357, 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Copenhagen, Dänemark, 7 Sept. 2017. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/d17-1141
Al-Khatib, K., Wachsmuth, H., Hagen, M., & Stein, B. (2017). Patterns of Argumentation Strategies across Topics. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (S. 1351-1357) https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/d17-1141
Al-Khatib K, Wachsmuth H, Hagen M, Stein B. Patterns of Argumentation Strategies across Topics. in Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2017. S. 1351-1357 doi: 10.18653/v1/d17-1141
Al-Khatib, Khalid ; Wachsmuth, Henning ; Hagen, Matthias et al. / Patterns of Argumentation Strategies across Topics. Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2017. S. 1351-1357
Download
@inproceedings{ea96c6d6ed914e8bb111fe88c918fe48,
title = "Patterns of Argumentation Strategies across Topics",
abstract = "This paper presents an analysis of argumentation strategies in news editorials within and across topics. Given nearly 29,000 argumentative editorials from the New York Times, we develop two machine learning models, one for determining an editorial{\textquoteright}s topic, and one for identifying evidence types in the editorial. Based on the distribution and structure of the identified types, we analyze the usage patterns of argumentation strategies among 12 different topics. We detect several common patterns that provide insights into the manifestation of argumentation strategies. Also, our experiments reveal clear correlations between the topics and the detected patterns.",
author = "Khalid Al-Khatib and Henning Wachsmuth and Matthias Hagen and Benno Stein",
year = "2017",
month = aug,
doi = "10.18653/v1/d17-1141",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781945626838",
pages = "1351--1357",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing",
note = "2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, EMNLP 2017 ; Conference date: 07-09-2017 Through 11-09-2017",

}

Download

TY - GEN

T1 - Patterns of Argumentation Strategies across Topics

AU - Al-Khatib, Khalid

AU - Wachsmuth, Henning

AU - Hagen, Matthias

AU - Stein, Benno

PY - 2017/8

Y1 - 2017/8

N2 - This paper presents an analysis of argumentation strategies in news editorials within and across topics. Given nearly 29,000 argumentative editorials from the New York Times, we develop two machine learning models, one for determining an editorial’s topic, and one for identifying evidence types in the editorial. Based on the distribution and structure of the identified types, we analyze the usage patterns of argumentation strategies among 12 different topics. We detect several common patterns that provide insights into the manifestation of argumentation strategies. Also, our experiments reveal clear correlations between the topics and the detected patterns.

AB - This paper presents an analysis of argumentation strategies in news editorials within and across topics. Given nearly 29,000 argumentative editorials from the New York Times, we develop two machine learning models, one for determining an editorial’s topic, and one for identifying evidence types in the editorial. Based on the distribution and structure of the identified types, we analyze the usage patterns of argumentation strategies among 12 different topics. We detect several common patterns that provide insights into the manifestation of argumentation strategies. Also, our experiments reveal clear correlations between the topics and the detected patterns.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061320727&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.18653/v1/d17-1141

DO - 10.18653/v1/d17-1141

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:85061320727

SN - 9781945626838

SP - 1351

EP - 1357

BT - Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing

T2 - 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, EMNLP 2017

Y2 - 7 September 2017 through 11 September 2017

ER -

Von denselben Autoren