Optimal design and performance assessment of multiple tuned mass damper inerters to mitigate seismic pounding of adjacent buildings

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Autoren

  • Salah Djerouni
  • Said Elias
  • Mahdi Abdeddaim
  • Rajesh Rupakhety

Externe Organisationen

  • University of Twente
Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Aufsatznummer103994
FachzeitschriftJournal of Building Engineering
Jahrgang48
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - Mai 2022
Extern publiziertJa

Abstract

This work investigates the efficiency of tuned inerter dampers (TIDs) in controlling seismic response of two adjacent buildings and the pounding distance between them. Pervious research on this subject has shown that installing TIDs in every floor of one of the buildings and coupling each floor of the two buildings with additional inerters (CS1) provides the best control performance. Some potential drawbacks of this solution are the large number of control devices used and practical difficulties associated with sharing inerters between adjacent buildings. To overcome these drawbacks, we propose a new configuration of TMDIs, called here as CS2. The proposed configuration makes use of much fewer control devices than CS1 and does not require coupling between the two buildings. Contrary to the findings of the published literature, we show that uncoupled control systems can be configured and tuned to be more effective than coupled systems. This superior performance of the proposed system is primarily due to the different arrangement of inerter devices in CS2 compared to that in CS1. In CS2, the inerters are connected to TMD masses rather than to the adjacent floors as is done in CS1. Performance assessment of the proposed solution and its comparison with CS1 is carried out through two numerical examples and several ground motions covering a large range of amplitude and frequency content. In the first numerical example, the adjacent buildings are of different heights but similar fundamental periods of vibration. In the second one, the buildings are of the same height but different fundamental periods of vibrations. These two examples cover cases of adjacent buildings facing lower and higher risk of pounding, respectively. The proposed solution is found to be effective and better than existing TID configuration in both the numerical examples studied here.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Zitieren

Optimal design and performance assessment of multiple tuned mass damper inerters to mitigate seismic pounding of adjacent buildings. / Djerouni, Salah; Elias, Said; Abdeddaim, Mahdi et al.
in: Journal of Building Engineering, Jahrgang 48, 103994, 05.2022.

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Djerouni S, Elias S, Abdeddaim M, Rupakhety R. Optimal design and performance assessment of multiple tuned mass damper inerters to mitigate seismic pounding of adjacent buildings. Journal of Building Engineering. 2022 Mai;48:103994. doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2022.103994
Djerouni, Salah ; Elias, Said ; Abdeddaim, Mahdi et al. / Optimal design and performance assessment of multiple tuned mass damper inerters to mitigate seismic pounding of adjacent buildings. in: Journal of Building Engineering. 2022 ; Jahrgang 48.
Download
@article{aeb6e1fbaa4445eca5da6ebdf20ec79d,
title = "Optimal design and performance assessment of multiple tuned mass damper inerters to mitigate seismic pounding of adjacent buildings",
abstract = "This work investigates the efficiency of tuned inerter dampers (TIDs) in controlling seismic response of two adjacent buildings and the pounding distance between them. Pervious research on this subject has shown that installing TIDs in every floor of one of the buildings and coupling each floor of the two buildings with additional inerters (CS1) provides the best control performance. Some potential drawbacks of this solution are the large number of control devices used and practical difficulties associated with sharing inerters between adjacent buildings. To overcome these drawbacks, we propose a new configuration of TMDIs, called here as CS2. The proposed configuration makes use of much fewer control devices than CS1 and does not require coupling between the two buildings. Contrary to the findings of the published literature, we show that uncoupled control systems can be configured and tuned to be more effective than coupled systems. This superior performance of the proposed system is primarily due to the different arrangement of inerter devices in CS2 compared to that in CS1. In CS2, the inerters are connected to TMD masses rather than to the adjacent floors as is done in CS1. Performance assessment of the proposed solution and its comparison with CS1 is carried out through two numerical examples and several ground motions covering a large range of amplitude and frequency content. In the first numerical example, the adjacent buildings are of different heights but similar fundamental periods of vibration. In the second one, the buildings are of the same height but different fundamental periods of vibrations. These two examples cover cases of adjacent buildings facing lower and higher risk of pounding, respectively. The proposed solution is found to be effective and better than existing TID configuration in both the numerical examples studied here.",
keywords = "adjacent buildings, H -norm, inertance, inerter, inter-storey drift, multiple tuned mass damper inerter, Particle swarm optimization, seismic pounding, shared, tuned inerter damper",
author = "Salah Djerouni and Said Elias and Mahdi Abdeddaim and Rajesh Rupakhety",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 The Authors",
year = "2022",
month = may,
doi = "10.1016/j.jobe.2022.103994",
language = "English",
volume = "48",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Optimal design and performance assessment of multiple tuned mass damper inerters to mitigate seismic pounding of adjacent buildings

AU - Djerouni, Salah

AU - Elias, Said

AU - Abdeddaim, Mahdi

AU - Rupakhety, Rajesh

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022 The Authors

PY - 2022/5

Y1 - 2022/5

N2 - This work investigates the efficiency of tuned inerter dampers (TIDs) in controlling seismic response of two adjacent buildings and the pounding distance between them. Pervious research on this subject has shown that installing TIDs in every floor of one of the buildings and coupling each floor of the two buildings with additional inerters (CS1) provides the best control performance. Some potential drawbacks of this solution are the large number of control devices used and practical difficulties associated with sharing inerters between adjacent buildings. To overcome these drawbacks, we propose a new configuration of TMDIs, called here as CS2. The proposed configuration makes use of much fewer control devices than CS1 and does not require coupling between the two buildings. Contrary to the findings of the published literature, we show that uncoupled control systems can be configured and tuned to be more effective than coupled systems. This superior performance of the proposed system is primarily due to the different arrangement of inerter devices in CS2 compared to that in CS1. In CS2, the inerters are connected to TMD masses rather than to the adjacent floors as is done in CS1. Performance assessment of the proposed solution and its comparison with CS1 is carried out through two numerical examples and several ground motions covering a large range of amplitude and frequency content. In the first numerical example, the adjacent buildings are of different heights but similar fundamental periods of vibration. In the second one, the buildings are of the same height but different fundamental periods of vibrations. These two examples cover cases of adjacent buildings facing lower and higher risk of pounding, respectively. The proposed solution is found to be effective and better than existing TID configuration in both the numerical examples studied here.

AB - This work investigates the efficiency of tuned inerter dampers (TIDs) in controlling seismic response of two adjacent buildings and the pounding distance between them. Pervious research on this subject has shown that installing TIDs in every floor of one of the buildings and coupling each floor of the two buildings with additional inerters (CS1) provides the best control performance. Some potential drawbacks of this solution are the large number of control devices used and practical difficulties associated with sharing inerters between adjacent buildings. To overcome these drawbacks, we propose a new configuration of TMDIs, called here as CS2. The proposed configuration makes use of much fewer control devices than CS1 and does not require coupling between the two buildings. Contrary to the findings of the published literature, we show that uncoupled control systems can be configured and tuned to be more effective than coupled systems. This superior performance of the proposed system is primarily due to the different arrangement of inerter devices in CS2 compared to that in CS1. In CS2, the inerters are connected to TMD masses rather than to the adjacent floors as is done in CS1. Performance assessment of the proposed solution and its comparison with CS1 is carried out through two numerical examples and several ground motions covering a large range of amplitude and frequency content. In the first numerical example, the adjacent buildings are of different heights but similar fundamental periods of vibration. In the second one, the buildings are of the same height but different fundamental periods of vibrations. These two examples cover cases of adjacent buildings facing lower and higher risk of pounding, respectively. The proposed solution is found to be effective and better than existing TID configuration in both the numerical examples studied here.

KW - adjacent buildings

KW - H -norm

KW - inertance

KW - inerter

KW - inter-storey drift

KW - multiple tuned mass damper inerter

KW - Particle swarm optimization

KW - seismic pounding

KW - shared

KW - tuned inerter damper

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85122636022&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jobe.2022.103994

DO - 10.1016/j.jobe.2022.103994

M3 - Article

VL - 48

JO - Journal of Building Engineering

JF - Journal of Building Engineering

M1 - 103994

ER -

Von denselben Autoren