Details
| Originalsprache | Englisch |
|---|---|
| Seiten (von - bis) | 107-124 |
| Seitenumfang | 18 |
| Fachzeitschrift | Applied energy |
| Jahrgang | 167 |
| Frühes Online-Datum | 5 Feb. 2016 |
| Publikationsstatus | Veröffentlicht - 1 Apr. 2016 |
Abstract
Typical power-to-gas plants mainly consist of a water electrolyzer, a mechanical compressor, an active cooler and a dryer. The best sequence of the single components as well as the pressure levels throughout the process are ambiguous. They depend on the hydrogen delivery pressure and the humidity requirements of the final product.The present analysis is based on a uniform technology independent model framework of the single process units. It allows for the calculation of the overall energy demand, independent of the requirements on hydrogen pressure and water content. In the present contribution two main superordinate configurations, which differ in the sequence of mechanical compressor and dryer, are compared and the best pressure profile throughout the process is determined.The analysis exemplarily focuses on hydrogen delivery pressures between 1 and 100 bar and an aimed maximal water content of 5 μmol/mol, as required e.g. for automotive applications. The results show that the energy demand for drying dominates the total energy balance at low delivery pressure. Higher electrolyzer pressures increase the losses due to hydrogen crossover. A mechanical compression prior to drying can be used to reduce the overall energy demand of the process. The electrolyzer pressure can be kept below 20 bar, which reduces hydrogen crossover and besides enables anyhow efficient drying at high pressures.
Schlagwörter
- Electrolysis pressure, Energy analysis, Energy storage, Hydrogen, PEM electrolysis, Power-to-gas, Drying, Gas compressors, Hydrogen storage
ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete
- Ingenieurwesen (insg.)
- Bauwesen
- Energie (insg.)
- Allgemeine Energie
- Ingenieurwesen (insg.)
- Maschinenbau
- Umweltwissenschaften (insg.)
- Management, Monitoring, Politik und Recht
Zitieren
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTex
- RIS
in: Applied energy, Jahrgang 167, 01.04.2016, S. 107-124.
Publikation: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift › Artikel › Forschung › Peer-Review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Optimal configuration and pressure levels of electrolyzer plants in context of power-to-gas applications
AU - Bensmann, B.
AU - Hanke-Rauschenbach, R.
AU - Müller-Syring, G.
AU - Henel, M.
AU - Sundmacher, K.
PY - 2016/4/1
Y1 - 2016/4/1
N2 - Typical power-to-gas plants mainly consist of a water electrolyzer, a mechanical compressor, an active cooler and a dryer. The best sequence of the single components as well as the pressure levels throughout the process are ambiguous. They depend on the hydrogen delivery pressure and the humidity requirements of the final product.The present analysis is based on a uniform technology independent model framework of the single process units. It allows for the calculation of the overall energy demand, independent of the requirements on hydrogen pressure and water content. In the present contribution two main superordinate configurations, which differ in the sequence of mechanical compressor and dryer, are compared and the best pressure profile throughout the process is determined.The analysis exemplarily focuses on hydrogen delivery pressures between 1 and 100 bar and an aimed maximal water content of 5 μmol/mol, as required e.g. for automotive applications. The results show that the energy demand for drying dominates the total energy balance at low delivery pressure. Higher electrolyzer pressures increase the losses due to hydrogen crossover. A mechanical compression prior to drying can be used to reduce the overall energy demand of the process. The electrolyzer pressure can be kept below 20 bar, which reduces hydrogen crossover and besides enables anyhow efficient drying at high pressures.
AB - Typical power-to-gas plants mainly consist of a water electrolyzer, a mechanical compressor, an active cooler and a dryer. The best sequence of the single components as well as the pressure levels throughout the process are ambiguous. They depend on the hydrogen delivery pressure and the humidity requirements of the final product.The present analysis is based on a uniform technology independent model framework of the single process units. It allows for the calculation of the overall energy demand, independent of the requirements on hydrogen pressure and water content. In the present contribution two main superordinate configurations, which differ in the sequence of mechanical compressor and dryer, are compared and the best pressure profile throughout the process is determined.The analysis exemplarily focuses on hydrogen delivery pressures between 1 and 100 bar and an aimed maximal water content of 5 μmol/mol, as required e.g. for automotive applications. The results show that the energy demand for drying dominates the total energy balance at low delivery pressure. Higher electrolyzer pressures increase the losses due to hydrogen crossover. A mechanical compression prior to drying can be used to reduce the overall energy demand of the process. The electrolyzer pressure can be kept below 20 bar, which reduces hydrogen crossover and besides enables anyhow efficient drying at high pressures.
KW - Electrolysis pressure
KW - Energy analysis
KW - Energy storage
KW - Hydrogen
KW - PEM electrolysis
KW - Power-to-gas
KW - Electrolysis pressure
KW - Energy analysis
KW - Energy storage
KW - Hydrogen
KW - PEM electrolysis
KW - Power-to-gas
KW - Drying
KW - Gas compressors
KW - Hydrogen storage
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84957797482&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.01.038
DO - 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.01.038
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84957797482
VL - 167
SP - 107
EP - 124
JO - Applied energy
JF - Applied energy
SN - 0306-2619
ER -