On the Limits of State-of-the-Art GNSS Receivers in Frequency Transfer

Publikation: Beitrag in Buch/Bericht/Sammelwerk/KonferenzbandBeitrag in Buch/SammelwerkForschungPeer-Review

Autoren

Organisationseinheiten

Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Titel des SammelwerksGeodesy for a Sustainable Earth
Herausgeber/-innenJeffrey T. Freymueller, Laura Sánchez
Kapitel145
Seiten313-319
Seitenumfang7
ISBN (elektronisch)978-3-031-29507-2
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 23 Aug. 2022

Publikationsreihe

NameInternational Association of Geodesy Symposia
Band154
ISSN (Print)0939-9585
ISSN (elektronisch)2197-9359

Abstract

GNSS frequency transfer (FT) based on precise point positioning delivers instability values down to sub-10 −16 between two modern receivers. In the present study we investigate the technical limits such receivers impose on FT by means of a dedicated experiment at Germany’s national metrology institute (PTB). For this purpose, four geodetic receivers, two of the same type each, were all connected to one single antenna and fed by the highly stable UTC (PTB) frequency signal. Since all error sources affecting the satellite signals are the same for all receivers, they cancel out when forming receiver-to-receiver single differences (SDs). Due to the fact that the remaining SD carrier phase ambiguities can be easily fixed to integer values, only the relative receiver clock error remains in the SDs. We assess the instability of three different receiver combinations, two with the same receiver type (intra-receiver) and one with different types (inter-receiver). The intra-receiver pairs reach lower instability values faster than the inter-receiver combination, which is in part caused by the different signal tracking modes of the receivers. To be specific, the 10 −18 instability range was only reached by the intra-receiver pairs, whereas the inter-receiver combination already hits its noise floor at about 1.5 ⋅ 10 −17. In addition, our analysis of using different observation type combinations only shows small differences regarding the link instability.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Zitieren

On the Limits of State-of-the-Art GNSS Receivers in Frequency Transfer. / Krawinkel, Thomas; Schön, Steffen.
Geodesy for a Sustainable Earth. Hrsg. / Jeffrey T. Freymueller; Laura Sánchez. 2022. S. 313-319 (International Association of Geodesy Symposia; Band 154).

Publikation: Beitrag in Buch/Bericht/Sammelwerk/KonferenzbandBeitrag in Buch/SammelwerkForschungPeer-Review

Krawinkel, T & Schön, S 2022, On the Limits of State-of-the-Art GNSS Receivers in Frequency Transfer. in JT Freymueller & L Sánchez (Hrsg.), Geodesy for a Sustainable Earth. International Association of Geodesy Symposia, Bd. 154, S. 313-319. https://doi.org/10.1007/1345_2022_145
Krawinkel, T., & Schön, S. (2022). On the Limits of State-of-the-Art GNSS Receivers in Frequency Transfer. In J. T. Freymueller, & L. Sánchez (Hrsg.), Geodesy for a Sustainable Earth (S. 313-319). (International Association of Geodesy Symposia; Band 154). https://doi.org/10.1007/1345_2022_145
Krawinkel T, Schön S. On the Limits of State-of-the-Art GNSS Receivers in Frequency Transfer. in Freymueller JT, Sánchez L, Hrsg., Geodesy for a Sustainable Earth. 2022. S. 313-319. (International Association of Geodesy Symposia). doi: 10.1007/1345_2022_145
Krawinkel, Thomas ; Schön, Steffen. / On the Limits of State-of-the-Art GNSS Receivers in Frequency Transfer. Geodesy for a Sustainable Earth. Hrsg. / Jeffrey T. Freymueller ; Laura Sánchez. 2022. S. 313-319 (International Association of Geodesy Symposia).
Download
@inbook{c65801f0ff984e9c9db5382629e0d31a,
title = "On the Limits of State-of-the-Art GNSS Receivers in Frequency Transfer",
abstract = "GNSS frequency transfer (FT) based on precise point positioning delivers instability values down to sub-10 −16 between two modern receivers. In the present study we investigate the technical limits such receivers impose on FT by means of a dedicated experiment at Germany{\textquoteright}s national metrology institute (PTB). For this purpose, four geodetic receivers, two of the same type each, were all connected to one single antenna and fed by the highly stable UTC (PTB) frequency signal. Since all error sources affecting the satellite signals are the same for all receivers, they cancel out when forming receiver-to-receiver single differences (SDs). Due to the fact that the remaining SD carrier phase ambiguities can be easily fixed to integer values, only the relative receiver clock error remains in the SDs. We assess the instability of three different receiver combinations, two with the same receiver type (intra-receiver) and one with different types (inter-receiver). The intra-receiver pairs reach lower instability values faster than the inter-receiver combination, which is in part caused by the different signal tracking modes of the receivers. To be specific, the 10 −18 instability range was only reached by the intra-receiver pairs, whereas the inter-receiver combination already hits its noise floor at about 1.5 ⋅ 10 −17. In addition, our analysis of using different observation type combinations only shows small differences regarding the link instability.",
keywords = "Allan deviation, Frequency transfer, GNSS",
author = "Thomas Krawinkel and Steffen Sch{\"o}n",
note = "Funding Information: This research was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) – project number 434617780 – SFB 1464.",
year = "2022",
month = aug,
day = "23",
doi = "10.1007/1345_2022_145",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-3-031-29506-5",
series = "International Association of Geodesy Symposia",
pages = "313--319",
editor = "Freymueller, {Jeffrey T.} and Laura S{\'a}nchez",
booktitle = "Geodesy for a Sustainable Earth",

}

Download

TY - CHAP

T1 - On the Limits of State-of-the-Art GNSS Receivers in Frequency Transfer

AU - Krawinkel, Thomas

AU - Schön, Steffen

N1 - Funding Information: This research was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) – project number 434617780 – SFB 1464.

PY - 2022/8/23

Y1 - 2022/8/23

N2 - GNSS frequency transfer (FT) based on precise point positioning delivers instability values down to sub-10 −16 between two modern receivers. In the present study we investigate the technical limits such receivers impose on FT by means of a dedicated experiment at Germany’s national metrology institute (PTB). For this purpose, four geodetic receivers, two of the same type each, were all connected to one single antenna and fed by the highly stable UTC (PTB) frequency signal. Since all error sources affecting the satellite signals are the same for all receivers, they cancel out when forming receiver-to-receiver single differences (SDs). Due to the fact that the remaining SD carrier phase ambiguities can be easily fixed to integer values, only the relative receiver clock error remains in the SDs. We assess the instability of three different receiver combinations, two with the same receiver type (intra-receiver) and one with different types (inter-receiver). The intra-receiver pairs reach lower instability values faster than the inter-receiver combination, which is in part caused by the different signal tracking modes of the receivers. To be specific, the 10 −18 instability range was only reached by the intra-receiver pairs, whereas the inter-receiver combination already hits its noise floor at about 1.5 ⋅ 10 −17. In addition, our analysis of using different observation type combinations only shows small differences regarding the link instability.

AB - GNSS frequency transfer (FT) based on precise point positioning delivers instability values down to sub-10 −16 between two modern receivers. In the present study we investigate the technical limits such receivers impose on FT by means of a dedicated experiment at Germany’s national metrology institute (PTB). For this purpose, four geodetic receivers, two of the same type each, were all connected to one single antenna and fed by the highly stable UTC (PTB) frequency signal. Since all error sources affecting the satellite signals are the same for all receivers, they cancel out when forming receiver-to-receiver single differences (SDs). Due to the fact that the remaining SD carrier phase ambiguities can be easily fixed to integer values, only the relative receiver clock error remains in the SDs. We assess the instability of three different receiver combinations, two with the same receiver type (intra-receiver) and one with different types (inter-receiver). The intra-receiver pairs reach lower instability values faster than the inter-receiver combination, which is in part caused by the different signal tracking modes of the receivers. To be specific, the 10 −18 instability range was only reached by the intra-receiver pairs, whereas the inter-receiver combination already hits its noise floor at about 1.5 ⋅ 10 −17. In addition, our analysis of using different observation type combinations only shows small differences regarding the link instability.

KW - Allan deviation

KW - Frequency transfer

KW - GNSS

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85172691400&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/1345_2022_145

DO - 10.1007/1345_2022_145

M3 - Contribution to book/anthology

SN - 978-3-031-29506-5

T3 - International Association of Geodesy Symposia

SP - 313

EP - 319

BT - Geodesy for a Sustainable Earth

A2 - Freymueller, Jeffrey T.

A2 - Sánchez, Laura

ER -

Von denselben Autoren