TY - GEN

T1 - On the Limits of State-of-the-Art GNSS Receivers in Frequency Transfer

AU - Krawinkel, Thomas

AU - Schön, Steffen

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022, The Author(s).

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - GNSS frequency transfer (FT) based on precise point positioning delivers instability values down to sub-10 −16 between two modern receivers. In the present study we investigate the technical limits such receivers impose on FT by means of a dedicated experiment at Germany’s national metrology institute (PTB). For this purpose, four geodetic receivers, two of the same type each, were all connected to one single antenna and fed by the highly stable UTC (PTB) frequency signal. Since all error sources affecting the satellite signals are the same for all receivers, they cancel out when forming receiver-to-receiver single differences (SDs). Due to the fact that the remaining SD carrier phase ambiguities can be easily fixed to integer values, only the relative receiver clock error remains in the SDs. We assess the instability of three different receiver combinations, two with the same receiver type (intra-receiver) and one with different types (inter-receiver). The intra-receiver pairs reach lower instability values faster than the inter-receiver combination, which is in part caused by the different signal tracking modes of the receivers. To be specific, the 10 −18 instability range was only reached by the intra-receiver pairs, whereas the inter-receiver combination already hits its noise floor at about 1.5 ⋅ 10 −17. In addition, our analysis of using different observation type combinations only shows small differences regarding the link instability.

AB - GNSS frequency transfer (FT) based on precise point positioning delivers instability values down to sub-10 −16 between two modern receivers. In the present study we investigate the technical limits such receivers impose on FT by means of a dedicated experiment at Germany’s national metrology institute (PTB). For this purpose, four geodetic receivers, two of the same type each, were all connected to one single antenna and fed by the highly stable UTC (PTB) frequency signal. Since all error sources affecting the satellite signals are the same for all receivers, they cancel out when forming receiver-to-receiver single differences (SDs). Due to the fact that the remaining SD carrier phase ambiguities can be easily fixed to integer values, only the relative receiver clock error remains in the SDs. We assess the instability of three different receiver combinations, two with the same receiver type (intra-receiver) and one with different types (inter-receiver). The intra-receiver pairs reach lower instability values faster than the inter-receiver combination, which is in part caused by the different signal tracking modes of the receivers. To be specific, the 10 −18 instability range was only reached by the intra-receiver pairs, whereas the inter-receiver combination already hits its noise floor at about 1.5 ⋅ 10 −17. In addition, our analysis of using different observation type combinations only shows small differences regarding the link instability.

KW - Allan deviation

KW - Frequency transfer

KW - GNSS

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85172691400&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/1345_2022_145

DO - 10.1007/1345_2022_145

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 978-3-031-29506-5

T3 - International Association of Geodesy Symposia

SP - 313

EP - 319

BT - Geodesy for a Sustainable Earth - Proceedings of the 2021 Scientific Assembly of the International Association of Geodesy

A2 - Freymueller, Jeffrey T.

A2 - Sánchez, Laura

T2 - Scientific Assembly of the International Association of Geodesy, IAG 2021

Y2 - 28 June 2021 through 2 July 2021

ER -