Details
Originalsprache | Englisch |
---|---|
Seiten (von - bis) | 135-147 |
Seitenumfang | 13 |
Fachzeitschrift | Agricultural economics |
Jahrgang | 31 |
Ausgabenummer | 2-3 SPEC. ISS. |
Frühes Online-Datum | 5 Nov. 2004 |
Publikationsstatus | Veröffentlicht - Dez. 2004 |
Extern publiziert | Ja |
Abstract
Why do some countries have eco-labelling programs and others do not? In this paper, we provide both theoretical arguments and empirical evidence suggesting that the answer to this question can shed new light on three questions that have taken center-stage in the trade and environment debate: (i) does trade exacerbate the exploitation of the environment; (ii) are countries competing in export markets engaged in a race to the bottom in environmental performance; and (iii) do market-based environmental instruments benefit the rich and hurt the poor?
ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete
- Agrar- und Biowissenschaften (insg.)
- Agronomie und Nutzpflanzenwissenschaften
- Volkswirtschaftslehre, Ökonometrie und Finanzen (insg.)
- Volkswirtschaftslehre und Ökonometrie
Zitieren
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTex
- RIS
in: Agricultural economics, Jahrgang 31, Nr. 2-3 SPEC. ISS., 12.2004, S. 135-147.
Publikation: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift › Artikel › Forschung › Peer-Review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - On export rivalry and the greening of agriculture - The role of eco-labels
AU - Basu, Arnab K.
AU - Chau, Nancy H.
AU - Grote, Ulrike
PY - 2004/12
Y1 - 2004/12
N2 - Why do some countries have eco-labelling programs and others do not? In this paper, we provide both theoretical arguments and empirical evidence suggesting that the answer to this question can shed new light on three questions that have taken center-stage in the trade and environment debate: (i) does trade exacerbate the exploitation of the environment; (ii) are countries competing in export markets engaged in a race to the bottom in environmental performance; and (iii) do market-based environmental instruments benefit the rich and hurt the poor?
AB - Why do some countries have eco-labelling programs and others do not? In this paper, we provide both theoretical arguments and empirical evidence suggesting that the answer to this question can shed new light on three questions that have taken center-stage in the trade and environment debate: (i) does trade exacerbate the exploitation of the environment; (ii) are countries competing in export markets engaged in a race to the bottom in environmental performance; and (iii) do market-based environmental instruments benefit the rich and hurt the poor?
KW - Eco-labelling in agriculture
KW - Export rivalry
KW - Strategic complementarity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=9644288240&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.agecon.2004.09.002
DO - 10.1016/j.agecon.2004.09.002
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:9644288240
VL - 31
SP - 135
EP - 147
JO - Agricultural economics
JF - Agricultural economics
SN - 0169-5150
IS - 2-3 SPEC. ISS.
ER -