Nutrient flows in international trade: Ecology and policy issues

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Autoren

  • Ulrike Grote
  • Eric Craswell
  • Paul Vlek

Externe Organisationen

  • Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn
Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)439-451
Seitenumfang13
FachzeitschriftEnvironmental Science and Policy
Jahrgang8
Ausgabenummer5
Frühes Online-Datum2 Sept. 2005
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - Okt. 2005
Extern publiziertJa

Abstract

Impacts of increasing population pressure on food demand and land resources has sparked interest in nutrient balances and flows at a range of scales. West Asia/North Africa, China, and sub-Saharan Africa are net importers of NPK in agricultural commodities. These imported nutrients do not, however, redress the widely recognized declines in fertility in sub-Saharan African soils, because the nutrients imported are commonly concentrated in the cities, creating waste disposal problems rather than alleviating deficiencies in rural soils. Countries with a net loss of NPK in agricultural commodities are the major food exporting countries-the United States, Australia, and some Latin American countries. In the case of the United States, exports of NPK will increase from 3.1 Tg in 1997 to 4.8 Tg in 2020. The results suggest that between 1997 and 2020, total international net flows of NPK in traded agricultural commodities will double to 8.8 million tonnes. Against this background, the paper analyses the impact of different policy measures on nutrient flows and balances. This includes not only the effects of agricultural trade liberalization and the reduction of subsidies, but also the more direct environmental policies like nutrient accounting schemes, eco-labeling, and nutrient trading. It finally stresses the need for environmental costs to be factored into the debate on nutrient management and advocates more inter-disciplinary research on these important problems.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Ziele für nachhaltige Entwicklung

Zitieren

Nutrient flows in international trade: Ecology and policy issues. / Grote, Ulrike; Craswell, Eric; Vlek, Paul.
in: Environmental Science and Policy, Jahrgang 8, Nr. 5, 10.2005, S. 439-451.

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Grote U, Craswell E, Vlek P. Nutrient flows in international trade: Ecology and policy issues. Environmental Science and Policy. 2005 Okt;8(5):439-451. Epub 2005 Sep 2. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2005.05.001
Grote, Ulrike ; Craswell, Eric ; Vlek, Paul. / Nutrient flows in international trade : Ecology and policy issues. in: Environmental Science and Policy. 2005 ; Jahrgang 8, Nr. 5. S. 439-451.
Download
@article{17876ea77bf247c78f24e7863974c4da,
title = "Nutrient flows in international trade: Ecology and policy issues",
abstract = "Impacts of increasing population pressure on food demand and land resources has sparked interest in nutrient balances and flows at a range of scales. West Asia/North Africa, China, and sub-Saharan Africa are net importers of NPK in agricultural commodities. These imported nutrients do not, however, redress the widely recognized declines in fertility in sub-Saharan African soils, because the nutrients imported are commonly concentrated in the cities, creating waste disposal problems rather than alleviating deficiencies in rural soils. Countries with a net loss of NPK in agricultural commodities are the major food exporting countries-the United States, Australia, and some Latin American countries. In the case of the United States, exports of NPK will increase from 3.1 Tg in 1997 to 4.8 Tg in 2020. The results suggest that between 1997 and 2020, total international net flows of NPK in traded agricultural commodities will double to 8.8 million tonnes. Against this background, the paper analyses the impact of different policy measures on nutrient flows and balances. This includes not only the effects of agricultural trade liberalization and the reduction of subsidies, but also the more direct environmental policies like nutrient accounting schemes, eco-labeling, and nutrient trading. It finally stresses the need for environmental costs to be factored into the debate on nutrient management and advocates more inter-disciplinary research on these important problems.",
keywords = "Environmental degradation, International trade, Nutrient accounting schemes, Nutrient flows, Nutrient trading permits",
author = "Ulrike Grote and Eric Craswell and Paul Vlek",
year = "2005",
month = oct,
doi = "10.1016/j.envsci.2005.05.001",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "439--451",
journal = "Environmental Science and Policy",
issn = "1462-9011",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "5",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Nutrient flows in international trade

T2 - Ecology and policy issues

AU - Grote, Ulrike

AU - Craswell, Eric

AU - Vlek, Paul

PY - 2005/10

Y1 - 2005/10

N2 - Impacts of increasing population pressure on food demand and land resources has sparked interest in nutrient balances and flows at a range of scales. West Asia/North Africa, China, and sub-Saharan Africa are net importers of NPK in agricultural commodities. These imported nutrients do not, however, redress the widely recognized declines in fertility in sub-Saharan African soils, because the nutrients imported are commonly concentrated in the cities, creating waste disposal problems rather than alleviating deficiencies in rural soils. Countries with a net loss of NPK in agricultural commodities are the major food exporting countries-the United States, Australia, and some Latin American countries. In the case of the United States, exports of NPK will increase from 3.1 Tg in 1997 to 4.8 Tg in 2020. The results suggest that between 1997 and 2020, total international net flows of NPK in traded agricultural commodities will double to 8.8 million tonnes. Against this background, the paper analyses the impact of different policy measures on nutrient flows and balances. This includes not only the effects of agricultural trade liberalization and the reduction of subsidies, but also the more direct environmental policies like nutrient accounting schemes, eco-labeling, and nutrient trading. It finally stresses the need for environmental costs to be factored into the debate on nutrient management and advocates more inter-disciplinary research on these important problems.

AB - Impacts of increasing population pressure on food demand and land resources has sparked interest in nutrient balances and flows at a range of scales. West Asia/North Africa, China, and sub-Saharan Africa are net importers of NPK in agricultural commodities. These imported nutrients do not, however, redress the widely recognized declines in fertility in sub-Saharan African soils, because the nutrients imported are commonly concentrated in the cities, creating waste disposal problems rather than alleviating deficiencies in rural soils. Countries with a net loss of NPK in agricultural commodities are the major food exporting countries-the United States, Australia, and some Latin American countries. In the case of the United States, exports of NPK will increase from 3.1 Tg in 1997 to 4.8 Tg in 2020. The results suggest that between 1997 and 2020, total international net flows of NPK in traded agricultural commodities will double to 8.8 million tonnes. Against this background, the paper analyses the impact of different policy measures on nutrient flows and balances. This includes not only the effects of agricultural trade liberalization and the reduction of subsidies, but also the more direct environmental policies like nutrient accounting schemes, eco-labeling, and nutrient trading. It finally stresses the need for environmental costs to be factored into the debate on nutrient management and advocates more inter-disciplinary research on these important problems.

KW - Environmental degradation

KW - International trade

KW - Nutrient accounting schemes

KW - Nutrient flows

KW - Nutrient trading permits

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=27144529531&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.envsci.2005.05.001

DO - 10.1016/j.envsci.2005.05.001

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:27144529531

VL - 8

SP - 439

EP - 451

JO - Environmental Science and Policy

JF - Environmental Science and Policy

SN - 1462-9011

IS - 5

ER -