No effect of birth order on adult risk taking

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Autoren

  • Tomás Lejarraga
  • Renato Frey
  • Daniel D. Schnitzlein
  • Ralph Hertwig

Organisationseinheiten

Externe Organisationen

  • University of the Balearic Islands
  • Max-Planck-Institut für Bildungsforschung
  • Universität Basel
  • Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung e.V. (DIW Berlin)
Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)6019-6024
Seitenumfang6
FachzeitschriftProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Jahrgang116
Ausgabenummer13
Frühes Online-Datum11 März 2019
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 26 März 2019

Abstract

Does birth order shape people's propensity to take risks? Evidence is mixed. We used a three-pronged approach to investigate birthorder effects on risk taking. First, we examined the propensity to take risks as measured by a self-report questionnaire administered in the German Socio-Economic Panel, one of the largest and most comprehensive household surveys. Second, we drew on data from the Basel Berlin Risk Study, one of the most exhaustive attempts to measure risk preference. This study administered 39 risk-taking measures, including a set of incentivized behavioral tasks. Finally, we considered the possibility that birth-order differences in risk taking are not reflected in survey responses and laboratory studies. We thus examined another source of behavioral data: the risky life decision to become an explorer or a revolutionary. Findings from these three qualitatively different sources of data and analytic methods point unanimously in the same direction: We found no birth-order effects on risk taking.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Zitieren

No effect of birth order on adult risk taking. / Lejarraga, Tomás; Frey, Renato; Schnitzlein, Daniel D. et al.
in: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Jahrgang 116, Nr. 13, 26.03.2019, S. 6019-6024.

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Lejarraga T, Frey R, Schnitzlein DD, Hertwig R. No effect of birth order on adult risk taking. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2019 Mär 26;116(13):6019-6024. Epub 2019 Mär 11. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1814153116
Lejarraga, Tomás ; Frey, Renato ; Schnitzlein, Daniel D. et al. / No effect of birth order on adult risk taking. in: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2019 ; Jahrgang 116, Nr. 13. S. 6019-6024.
Download
@article{695eb5570f5f43148d2a52c85473d321,
title = "No effect of birth order on adult risk taking",
abstract = "Does birth order shape people's propensity to take risks? Evidence is mixed. We used a three-pronged approach to investigate birthorder effects on risk taking. First, we examined the propensity to take risks as measured by a self-report questionnaire administered in the German Socio-Economic Panel, one of the largest and most comprehensive household surveys. Second, we drew on data from the Basel Berlin Risk Study, one of the most exhaustive attempts to measure risk preference. This study administered 39 risk-taking measures, including a set of incentivized behavioral tasks. Finally, we considered the possibility that birth-order differences in risk taking are not reflected in survey responses and laboratory studies. We thus examined another source of behavioral data: the risky life decision to become an explorer or a revolutionary. Findings from these three qualitatively different sources of data and analytic methods point unanimously in the same direction: We found no birth-order effects on risk taking.",
keywords = "BBRS, Birth order, Family dynamics, Risk taking, SOEP",
author = "Tom{\'a}s Lejarraga and Renato Frey and Schnitzlein, {Daniel D.} and Ralph Hertwig",
note = "Funding information: We thank Susannah Goss for editing the manuscript. We also thank Jill de Ron, Max Rank, Amanda Barreiro, and Iro Eleftheriadou for research assistance.",
year = "2019",
month = mar,
day = "26",
doi = "10.1073/pnas.1814153116",
language = "English",
volume = "116",
pages = "6019--6024",
journal = "Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America",
issn = "0027-8424",
publisher = "National Academy of Sciences",
number = "13",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - No effect of birth order on adult risk taking

AU - Lejarraga, Tomás

AU - Frey, Renato

AU - Schnitzlein, Daniel D.

AU - Hertwig, Ralph

N1 - Funding information: We thank Susannah Goss for editing the manuscript. We also thank Jill de Ron, Max Rank, Amanda Barreiro, and Iro Eleftheriadou for research assistance.

PY - 2019/3/26

Y1 - 2019/3/26

N2 - Does birth order shape people's propensity to take risks? Evidence is mixed. We used a three-pronged approach to investigate birthorder effects on risk taking. First, we examined the propensity to take risks as measured by a self-report questionnaire administered in the German Socio-Economic Panel, one of the largest and most comprehensive household surveys. Second, we drew on data from the Basel Berlin Risk Study, one of the most exhaustive attempts to measure risk preference. This study administered 39 risk-taking measures, including a set of incentivized behavioral tasks. Finally, we considered the possibility that birth-order differences in risk taking are not reflected in survey responses and laboratory studies. We thus examined another source of behavioral data: the risky life decision to become an explorer or a revolutionary. Findings from these three qualitatively different sources of data and analytic methods point unanimously in the same direction: We found no birth-order effects on risk taking.

AB - Does birth order shape people's propensity to take risks? Evidence is mixed. We used a three-pronged approach to investigate birthorder effects on risk taking. First, we examined the propensity to take risks as measured by a self-report questionnaire administered in the German Socio-Economic Panel, one of the largest and most comprehensive household surveys. Second, we drew on data from the Basel Berlin Risk Study, one of the most exhaustive attempts to measure risk preference. This study administered 39 risk-taking measures, including a set of incentivized behavioral tasks. Finally, we considered the possibility that birth-order differences in risk taking are not reflected in survey responses and laboratory studies. We thus examined another source of behavioral data: the risky life decision to become an explorer or a revolutionary. Findings from these three qualitatively different sources of data and analytic methods point unanimously in the same direction: We found no birth-order effects on risk taking.

KW - BBRS

KW - Birth order

KW - Family dynamics

KW - Risk taking

KW - SOEP

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063969677&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1073/pnas.1814153116

DO - 10.1073/pnas.1814153116

M3 - Article

C2 - 30858316

AN - SCOPUS:85063969677

VL - 116

SP - 6019

EP - 6024

JO - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

JF - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

SN - 0027-8424

IS - 13

ER -