Monitoring of Microalgal Processes

Publikation: Beitrag in Buch/Bericht/Sammelwerk/KonferenzbandBeitrag in Buch/SammelwerkForschungPeer-Review

Autoren

Organisationseinheiten

Externe Organisationen

  • Colorado State University
Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Titel des SammelwerksMicroalgae Biotechnology
Seiten89-142
Seitenumfang54
ISBN (elektronisch)978-3-319-23808-1
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 21 Aug. 2015

Publikationsreihe

NameAdvances in Biochemical Engineering/Biotechnology
Herausgeber (Verlag)Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH
Band153
ISSN (Print)0724-6145

Abstract

Process monitoring, which can be defined as the measurement of process variables with the smallest possible delay, is combined with process models to form the basis for successful process control. Minimizing the measurement delay leads inevitably to employing online, in situ sensors where possible, preferably using noninvasive measurement methods with stable, low-cost sensors. Microalgal processes have similarities to traditional bioprocesses but also have unique monitoring requirements. In general, variables to be monitored in microalgal processes can be categorized as physical, chemical, and biological, and they are measured in gaseous, liquid, and solid (biological) phases. Physical and chemical process variables can be usually monitored online using standard industrial sensors. The monitoring of biological process variables, however, relies mostly on sensors developed and validated using laboratory-scale systems or uses offline methods because of difficulties in developing suitable online sensors. Here, we review current technologies for online, in situ monitoring of all types of process parameters of microalgal cultivations, with a focus on monitoring of biological parameters. We discuss newly introduced methods for measuring biological parameters that could be possibly adapted for routine online use, should be preferably noninvasive, and are based on approaches that have been proven in other bioprocesses. New sensor types for measuring physicochemical parameters using optical methods or ion-specific field effect transistor (ISFET) sensors are also discussed. Reviewed methods with online implementation or online potential include measurement of irradiance, biomass concentration by optical density and image analysis, cell count, chlorophyll fluorescence, growth rate, lipid concentration by infrared spectrophotometry, dielectric scattering, and nuclear magnetic resonance. Future perspectives are discussed, especially in the field of image analysis using in situ microscopy, infrared spectrophotometry, and software sensor systems.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Zitieren

Monitoring of Microalgal Processes. / Havlik, Ivo; Scheper, Thomas; Reardon, Kenneth F.
Microalgae Biotechnology. 2015. S. 89-142 (Advances in Biochemical Engineering/Biotechnology; Band 153).

Publikation: Beitrag in Buch/Bericht/Sammelwerk/KonferenzbandBeitrag in Buch/SammelwerkForschungPeer-Review

Havlik, I, Scheper, T & Reardon, KF 2015, Monitoring of Microalgal Processes. in Microalgae Biotechnology. Advances in Biochemical Engineering/Biotechnology, Bd. 153, S. 89-142. https://doi.org/10.1007/10_2015_328
Havlik, I., Scheper, T., & Reardon, K. F. (2015). Monitoring of Microalgal Processes. In Microalgae Biotechnology (S. 89-142). (Advances in Biochemical Engineering/Biotechnology; Band 153). https://doi.org/10.1007/10_2015_328
Havlik I, Scheper T, Reardon KF. Monitoring of Microalgal Processes. in Microalgae Biotechnology. 2015. S. 89-142. (Advances in Biochemical Engineering/Biotechnology). doi: 10.1007/10_2015_328
Havlik, Ivo ; Scheper, Thomas ; Reardon, Kenneth F. / Monitoring of Microalgal Processes. Microalgae Biotechnology. 2015. S. 89-142 (Advances in Biochemical Engineering/Biotechnology).
Download
@inbook{a65d8c20c7424f4f8317914a208eb36d,
title = "Monitoring of Microalgal Processes",
abstract = "Process monitoring, which can be defined as the measurement of process variables with the smallest possible delay, is combined with process models to form the basis for successful process control. Minimizing the measurement delay leads inevitably to employing online, in situ sensors where possible, preferably using noninvasive measurement methods with stable, low-cost sensors. Microalgal processes have similarities to traditional bioprocesses but also have unique monitoring requirements. In general, variables to be monitored in microalgal processes can be categorized as physical, chemical, and biological, and they are measured in gaseous, liquid, and solid (biological) phases. Physical and chemical process variables can be usually monitored online using standard industrial sensors. The monitoring of biological process variables, however, relies mostly on sensors developed and validated using laboratory-scale systems or uses offline methods because of difficulties in developing suitable online sensors. Here, we review current technologies for online, in situ monitoring of all types of process parameters of microalgal cultivations, with a focus on monitoring of biological parameters. We discuss newly introduced methods for measuring biological parameters that could be possibly adapted for routine online use, should be preferably noninvasive, and are based on approaches that have been proven in other bioprocesses. New sensor types for measuring physicochemical parameters using optical methods or ion-specific field effect transistor (ISFET) sensors are also discussed. Reviewed methods with online implementation or online potential include measurement of irradiance, biomass concentration by optical density and image analysis, cell count, chlorophyll fluorescence, growth rate, lipid concentration by infrared spectrophotometry, dielectric scattering, and nuclear magnetic resonance. Future perspectives are discussed, especially in the field of image analysis using in situ microscopy, infrared spectrophotometry, and software sensor systems.",
keywords = "Image analysis, Microalgal cultivations, Online monitoring, Optical sensors, Software sensors",
author = "Ivo Havlik and Thomas Scheper and Reardon, {Kenneth F.}",
year = "2015",
month = aug,
day = "21",
doi = "10.1007/10_2015_328",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-3-319-23807-4",
series = "Advances in Biochemical Engineering/Biotechnology",
publisher = "Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH",
pages = "89--142",
booktitle = "Microalgae Biotechnology",

}

Download

TY - CHAP

T1 - Monitoring of Microalgal Processes

AU - Havlik, Ivo

AU - Scheper, Thomas

AU - Reardon, Kenneth F.

PY - 2015/8/21

Y1 - 2015/8/21

N2 - Process monitoring, which can be defined as the measurement of process variables with the smallest possible delay, is combined with process models to form the basis for successful process control. Minimizing the measurement delay leads inevitably to employing online, in situ sensors where possible, preferably using noninvasive measurement methods with stable, low-cost sensors. Microalgal processes have similarities to traditional bioprocesses but also have unique monitoring requirements. In general, variables to be monitored in microalgal processes can be categorized as physical, chemical, and biological, and they are measured in gaseous, liquid, and solid (biological) phases. Physical and chemical process variables can be usually monitored online using standard industrial sensors. The monitoring of biological process variables, however, relies mostly on sensors developed and validated using laboratory-scale systems or uses offline methods because of difficulties in developing suitable online sensors. Here, we review current technologies for online, in situ monitoring of all types of process parameters of microalgal cultivations, with a focus on monitoring of biological parameters. We discuss newly introduced methods for measuring biological parameters that could be possibly adapted for routine online use, should be preferably noninvasive, and are based on approaches that have been proven in other bioprocesses. New sensor types for measuring physicochemical parameters using optical methods or ion-specific field effect transistor (ISFET) sensors are also discussed. Reviewed methods with online implementation or online potential include measurement of irradiance, biomass concentration by optical density and image analysis, cell count, chlorophyll fluorescence, growth rate, lipid concentration by infrared spectrophotometry, dielectric scattering, and nuclear magnetic resonance. Future perspectives are discussed, especially in the field of image analysis using in situ microscopy, infrared spectrophotometry, and software sensor systems.

AB - Process monitoring, which can be defined as the measurement of process variables with the smallest possible delay, is combined with process models to form the basis for successful process control. Minimizing the measurement delay leads inevitably to employing online, in situ sensors where possible, preferably using noninvasive measurement methods with stable, low-cost sensors. Microalgal processes have similarities to traditional bioprocesses but also have unique monitoring requirements. In general, variables to be monitored in microalgal processes can be categorized as physical, chemical, and biological, and they are measured in gaseous, liquid, and solid (biological) phases. Physical and chemical process variables can be usually monitored online using standard industrial sensors. The monitoring of biological process variables, however, relies mostly on sensors developed and validated using laboratory-scale systems or uses offline methods because of difficulties in developing suitable online sensors. Here, we review current technologies for online, in situ monitoring of all types of process parameters of microalgal cultivations, with a focus on monitoring of biological parameters. We discuss newly introduced methods for measuring biological parameters that could be possibly adapted for routine online use, should be preferably noninvasive, and are based on approaches that have been proven in other bioprocesses. New sensor types for measuring physicochemical parameters using optical methods or ion-specific field effect transistor (ISFET) sensors are also discussed. Reviewed methods with online implementation or online potential include measurement of irradiance, biomass concentration by optical density and image analysis, cell count, chlorophyll fluorescence, growth rate, lipid concentration by infrared spectrophotometry, dielectric scattering, and nuclear magnetic resonance. Future perspectives are discussed, especially in the field of image analysis using in situ microscopy, infrared spectrophotometry, and software sensor systems.

KW - Image analysis

KW - Microalgal cultivations

KW - Online monitoring

KW - Optical sensors

KW - Software sensors

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84951310247&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/10_2015_328

DO - 10.1007/10_2015_328

M3 - Contribution to book/anthology

C2 - 26289537

AN - SCOPUS:84951310247

SN - 978-3-319-23807-4

T3 - Advances in Biochemical Engineering/Biotechnology

SP - 89

EP - 142

BT - Microalgae Biotechnology

ER -

Von denselben Autoren