Modeling Frames in Argumentation

Publikation: Beitrag in Buch/Bericht/Sammelwerk/KonferenzbandAufsatz in KonferenzbandForschungPeer-Review

Autoren

Externe Organisationen

  • Bauhaus-Universität Weimar
  • Universität Paderborn
Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Titel des SammelwerksProceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP)
Herausgeber/-innenKentaro Inui, Jing Jiang, Vincent Ng, Xiaojun Wan
Seiten2922-2932
Seitenumfang11
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - Nov. 2019
Extern publiziertJa
Veranstaltung2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, EMNLP-IJCNLP 2019 - Hong Kong, China
Dauer: 3 Nov. 20197 Nov. 2019

Abstract

In argumentation, framing is used to emphasize a specific aspect of a controversial topic while concealing others. When discussing the legalization of drugs, for instance, its economical aspect may be emphasized. In general, we call a set of arguments that focus on the same aspect a frame. An argumentative text has to serve the “right” frame(s) to convince the audience to adopt the author's stance (e.g., being pro or con legalizing drugs). More specifically, an author has to choose frames that fit the audience's interests and cultural background. This paper introduces frame identification, which is the task of splitting a set of arguments into a set of non-overlapping frames. We present a fully unsupervised approach to this task, which first removes topical information from the arguments and then identifies frames using clustering. For evaluation purposes, we provide a corpus with 12 326 debate-portal arguments, organized along the frames of the debates' topics. On this corpus, our approach outperforms different strong baselines, achieving an F1-score of 0.28.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Zitieren

Modeling Frames in Argumentation. / Ajjour, Yamen; Alshomary, Milad; Wachsmuth, Henning et al.
Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP). Hrsg. / Kentaro Inui; Jing Jiang; Vincent Ng; Xiaojun Wan. 2019. S. 2922-2932.

Publikation: Beitrag in Buch/Bericht/Sammelwerk/KonferenzbandAufsatz in KonferenzbandForschungPeer-Review

Ajjour, Y, Alshomary, M, Wachsmuth, H & Stein, B 2019, Modeling Frames in Argumentation. in K Inui, J Jiang, V Ng & X Wan (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP). S. 2922-2932, 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, EMNLP-IJCNLP 2019, Hong Kong, China, 3 Nov. 2019. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/D19-1290
Ajjour, Y., Alshomary, M., Wachsmuth, H., & Stein, B. (2019). Modeling Frames in Argumentation. In K. Inui, J. Jiang, V. Ng, & X. Wan (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP) (S. 2922-2932) https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/D19-1290
Ajjour Y, Alshomary M, Wachsmuth H, Stein B. Modeling Frames in Argumentation. in Inui K, Jiang J, Ng V, Wan X, Hrsg., Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP). 2019. S. 2922-2932 doi: 10.18653/v1/D19-1290
Ajjour, Yamen ; Alshomary, Milad ; Wachsmuth, Henning et al. / Modeling Frames in Argumentation. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP). Hrsg. / Kentaro Inui ; Jing Jiang ; Vincent Ng ; Xiaojun Wan. 2019. S. 2922-2932
Download
@inproceedings{7e0f518fbca94bb2b237c0d6a903a558,
title = "Modeling Frames in Argumentation",
abstract = "In argumentation, framing is used to emphasize a specific aspect of a controversial topic while concealing others. When discussing the legalization of drugs, for instance, its economical aspect may be emphasized. In general, we call a set of arguments that focus on the same aspect a frame. An argumentative text has to serve the “right” frame(s) to convince the audience to adopt the author's stance (e.g., being pro or con legalizing drugs). More specifically, an author has to choose frames that fit the audience's interests and cultural background. This paper introduces frame identification, which is the task of splitting a set of arguments into a set of non-overlapping frames. We present a fully unsupervised approach to this task, which first removes topical information from the arguments and then identifies frames using clustering. For evaluation purposes, we provide a corpus with 12 326 debate-portal arguments, organized along the frames of the debates' topics. On this corpus, our approach outperforms different strong baselines, achieving an F1-score of 0.28.",
author = "Yamen Ajjour and Milad Alshomary and Henning Wachsmuth and Benno Stein",
year = "2019",
month = nov,
doi = "10.18653/v1/D19-1290",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781950737901",
pages = "2922--2932",
editor = "Kentaro Inui and Jing Jiang and Vincent Ng and Xiaojun Wan",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP)",
note = "2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, EMNLP-IJCNLP 2019 ; Conference date: 03-11-2019 Through 07-11-2019",

}

Download

TY - GEN

T1 - Modeling Frames in Argumentation

AU - Ajjour, Yamen

AU - Alshomary, Milad

AU - Wachsmuth, Henning

AU - Stein, Benno

PY - 2019/11

Y1 - 2019/11

N2 - In argumentation, framing is used to emphasize a specific aspect of a controversial topic while concealing others. When discussing the legalization of drugs, for instance, its economical aspect may be emphasized. In general, we call a set of arguments that focus on the same aspect a frame. An argumentative text has to serve the “right” frame(s) to convince the audience to adopt the author's stance (e.g., being pro or con legalizing drugs). More specifically, an author has to choose frames that fit the audience's interests and cultural background. This paper introduces frame identification, which is the task of splitting a set of arguments into a set of non-overlapping frames. We present a fully unsupervised approach to this task, which first removes topical information from the arguments and then identifies frames using clustering. For evaluation purposes, we provide a corpus with 12 326 debate-portal arguments, organized along the frames of the debates' topics. On this corpus, our approach outperforms different strong baselines, achieving an F1-score of 0.28.

AB - In argumentation, framing is used to emphasize a specific aspect of a controversial topic while concealing others. When discussing the legalization of drugs, for instance, its economical aspect may be emphasized. In general, we call a set of arguments that focus on the same aspect a frame. An argumentative text has to serve the “right” frame(s) to convince the audience to adopt the author's stance (e.g., being pro or con legalizing drugs). More specifically, an author has to choose frames that fit the audience's interests and cultural background. This paper introduces frame identification, which is the task of splitting a set of arguments into a set of non-overlapping frames. We present a fully unsupervised approach to this task, which first removes topical information from the arguments and then identifies frames using clustering. For evaluation purposes, we provide a corpus with 12 326 debate-portal arguments, organized along the frames of the debates' topics. On this corpus, our approach outperforms different strong baselines, achieving an F1-score of 0.28.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85084291029&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.18653/v1/D19-1290

DO - 10.18653/v1/D19-1290

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:85084291029

SN - 9781950737901

SP - 2922

EP - 2932

BT - Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP)

A2 - Inui, Kentaro

A2 - Jiang, Jing

A2 - Ng, Vincent

A2 - Wan, Xiaojun

T2 - 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, EMNLP-IJCNLP 2019

Y2 - 3 November 2019 through 7 November 2019

ER -

Von denselben Autoren