Details
| Originalsprache | Englisch |
|---|---|
| Seiten (von - bis) | 101-116 |
| Seitenumfang | 16 |
| Fachzeitschrift | Biometrical journal |
| Jahrgang | 44 |
| Ausgabenummer | 1 |
| Publikationsstatus | Veröffentlicht - 23 Jan. 2002 |
Abstract
CHEUNG and HOLLAND (1992) extended Dunnett's procedure for comparing all active treatments with a control simultaneously within each of r groups while maintaining the Type I error rate at some designated level α allowing different sample sizes for each of the group-treatment categories. This paper shows that exact percentage points can be easily calculated with current available statistical software (SAS). This procedure is compared to resampling techniques and a Bonferroni corrected Dunnett-with-in-group procedure by means of a simulation study.
ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete
- Mathematik (insg.)
- Statistik und Wahrscheinlichkeit
- Entscheidungswissenschaften (insg.)
- Statistik, Wahrscheinlichkeit und Ungewissheit
Zitieren
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTex
- RIS
in: Biometrical journal, Jahrgang 44, Nr. 1, 23.01.2002, S. 101-116.
Publikation: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift › Artikel › Forschung › Peer-Review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Many-to-one comparisons in stratified designs
AU - Biesheuvel, Egbert
AU - Hothorn, Ludwig A.
PY - 2002/1/23
Y1 - 2002/1/23
N2 - CHEUNG and HOLLAND (1992) extended Dunnett's procedure for comparing all active treatments with a control simultaneously within each of r groups while maintaining the Type I error rate at some designated level α allowing different sample sizes for each of the group-treatment categories. This paper shows that exact percentage points can be easily calculated with current available statistical software (SAS). This procedure is compared to resampling techniques and a Bonferroni corrected Dunnett-with-in-group procedure by means of a simulation study.
AB - CHEUNG and HOLLAND (1992) extended Dunnett's procedure for comparing all active treatments with a control simultaneously within each of r groups while maintaining the Type I error rate at some designated level α allowing different sample sizes for each of the group-treatment categories. This paper shows that exact percentage points can be easily calculated with current available statistical software (SAS). This procedure is compared to resampling techniques and a Bonferroni corrected Dunnett-with-in-group procedure by means of a simulation study.
KW - Comparisons with a control
KW - Resampling Techniques
KW - Stratified Design
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036002840&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/1521-4036(200201)44:1<101::AID-BIMJ101>3.0.CO;2-H
DO - 10.1002/1521-4036(200201)44:1<101::AID-BIMJ101>3.0.CO;2-H
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0036002840
VL - 44
SP - 101
EP - 116
JO - Biometrical journal
JF - Biometrical journal
SN - 0323-3847
IS - 1
ER -