Details
Originalsprache | Englisch |
---|---|
Aufsatznummer | e0178585 |
Fachzeitschrift | PLOS ONE |
Jahrgang | 12 |
Ausgabenummer | 6 |
Publikationsstatus | Veröffentlicht - 29 Juni 2017 |
Extern publiziert | Ja |
Abstract
Objective Back pain is a major problem requiring pragmatic interventions, low in costs for health care providers and feasible for individuals to perform. Our objective was to test the effectiveness of a low-dose 5-month exercise intervention with small personnel investment on low back strength and self-perceived pain. Methods Two hundred twenty-six employees (age: 42.7±10.2 years) from three mid-size companies were randomized to 5-month non-supervised training at home (3 times/week for 20 minutes) or wait-list-control. Health insurance professionals instructed the participants on trunk exercises at the start and then supervised participants once a month. Results Muscle strength for back extension increased after the 5-month intervention with a significant between-group difference (mean 27.4 Newton [95%CI 2.2; 60.3]) favoring the exercise group (p = 0.035). Low back pain was reduced more in subjects after exercise than control (mean difference ±0.74 cm [95%CI ±1.17; ±0.27], p = 0.002). No between-group differences were observed for back pain related disability and work ability. After stratified analysis only subjects with preexisting chronic low back pain showed a between-group difference (exercise versus controls) after the intervention in their strength for back extension (mean 55.7 Newton [95%CI 2.8; 108.5], p = 0.039), self-perceived pain (mean ±1.42 cm [95%CI ±2.32; ±0.51], p = 0.003) and work ability (mean 2.1 points [95%CI 0.2; 4.0], p = 0.032). Significant between-group differences were not observed in subjects without low back pain: strength for back extension (mean 23.4 Newton [95%CI ±11.2; 58.1], p = 0.184), self-perceived pain (mean ±0.48 cm [95%CI ±0.99; 0.04], p = 0.067) and work ability (mean ±0.1 points [95%CI ±0.9; 0.9], p = 0.999). An interaction between low back pain subgroups and the study intervention (exercise versus control) was exclusively observed for the work ability index (p = 0.016). Conclusion In middle-aged employees a low-dose, non-supervised exercise program implemented over 20 weeks improved trunk muscle strength and low back pain, and in those with preexisting chronic low back pain improved work ability.
ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete
- Biochemie, Genetik und Molekularbiologie (insg.)
- Allgemeine Biochemie, Genetik und Molekularbiologie
- Agrar- und Biowissenschaften (insg.)
- Allgemeine Agrar- und Biowissenschaften
- Allgemein
Zitieren
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTex
- RIS
in: PLOS ONE, Jahrgang 12, Nr. 6, e0178585, 29.06.2017.
Publikation: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift › Artikel › Forschung › Peer-Review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Low-dose, non-supervised, health insurance initiated exercise for the treatment and prevention of chronic low back pain in employees. Results from a randomized controlled trial
AU - Haufe, Sven
AU - Wiechmann, Klaus
AU - Stein, Lothar
AU - Kuck, Momme
AU - Smith, Andrea
AU - Meineke, Stefan
AU - Zirkelbach, Yvonne
AU - Duarte, Samuel Rodriguez
AU - Drupp, Michael
AU - Tegtbur, Uwe
PY - 2017/6/29
Y1 - 2017/6/29
N2 - Objective Back pain is a major problem requiring pragmatic interventions, low in costs for health care providers and feasible for individuals to perform. Our objective was to test the effectiveness of a low-dose 5-month exercise intervention with small personnel investment on low back strength and self-perceived pain. Methods Two hundred twenty-six employees (age: 42.7±10.2 years) from three mid-size companies were randomized to 5-month non-supervised training at home (3 times/week for 20 minutes) or wait-list-control. Health insurance professionals instructed the participants on trunk exercises at the start and then supervised participants once a month. Results Muscle strength for back extension increased after the 5-month intervention with a significant between-group difference (mean 27.4 Newton [95%CI 2.2; 60.3]) favoring the exercise group (p = 0.035). Low back pain was reduced more in subjects after exercise than control (mean difference ±0.74 cm [95%CI ±1.17; ±0.27], p = 0.002). No between-group differences were observed for back pain related disability and work ability. After stratified analysis only subjects with preexisting chronic low back pain showed a between-group difference (exercise versus controls) after the intervention in their strength for back extension (mean 55.7 Newton [95%CI 2.8; 108.5], p = 0.039), self-perceived pain (mean ±1.42 cm [95%CI ±2.32; ±0.51], p = 0.003) and work ability (mean 2.1 points [95%CI 0.2; 4.0], p = 0.032). Significant between-group differences were not observed in subjects without low back pain: strength for back extension (mean 23.4 Newton [95%CI ±11.2; 58.1], p = 0.184), self-perceived pain (mean ±0.48 cm [95%CI ±0.99; 0.04], p = 0.067) and work ability (mean ±0.1 points [95%CI ±0.9; 0.9], p = 0.999). An interaction between low back pain subgroups and the study intervention (exercise versus control) was exclusively observed for the work ability index (p = 0.016). Conclusion In middle-aged employees a low-dose, non-supervised exercise program implemented over 20 weeks improved trunk muscle strength and low back pain, and in those with preexisting chronic low back pain improved work ability.
AB - Objective Back pain is a major problem requiring pragmatic interventions, low in costs for health care providers and feasible for individuals to perform. Our objective was to test the effectiveness of a low-dose 5-month exercise intervention with small personnel investment on low back strength and self-perceived pain. Methods Two hundred twenty-six employees (age: 42.7±10.2 years) from three mid-size companies were randomized to 5-month non-supervised training at home (3 times/week for 20 minutes) or wait-list-control. Health insurance professionals instructed the participants on trunk exercises at the start and then supervised participants once a month. Results Muscle strength for back extension increased after the 5-month intervention with a significant between-group difference (mean 27.4 Newton [95%CI 2.2; 60.3]) favoring the exercise group (p = 0.035). Low back pain was reduced more in subjects after exercise than control (mean difference ±0.74 cm [95%CI ±1.17; ±0.27], p = 0.002). No between-group differences were observed for back pain related disability and work ability. After stratified analysis only subjects with preexisting chronic low back pain showed a between-group difference (exercise versus controls) after the intervention in their strength for back extension (mean 55.7 Newton [95%CI 2.8; 108.5], p = 0.039), self-perceived pain (mean ±1.42 cm [95%CI ±2.32; ±0.51], p = 0.003) and work ability (mean 2.1 points [95%CI 0.2; 4.0], p = 0.032). Significant between-group differences were not observed in subjects without low back pain: strength for back extension (mean 23.4 Newton [95%CI ±11.2; 58.1], p = 0.184), self-perceived pain (mean ±0.48 cm [95%CI ±0.99; 0.04], p = 0.067) and work ability (mean ±0.1 points [95%CI ±0.9; 0.9], p = 0.999). An interaction between low back pain subgroups and the study intervention (exercise versus control) was exclusively observed for the work ability index (p = 0.016). Conclusion In middle-aged employees a low-dose, non-supervised exercise program implemented over 20 weeks improved trunk muscle strength and low back pain, and in those with preexisting chronic low back pain improved work ability.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85021655239&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0178585
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0178585
M3 - Article
C2 - 28662094
AN - SCOPUS:85021655239
VL - 12
JO - PLOS ONE
JF - PLOS ONE
SN - 1932-6203
IS - 6
M1 - e0178585
ER -