Let Me Grab This: A Comparison of EMS and Vibration for Haptic Feedback in Free-Hand Interaction

Publikation: Beitrag in Buch/Bericht/Sammelwerk/KonferenzbandAufsatz in KonferenzbandForschungPeer-Review

Autoren

  • Max Pfeiffer
  • Stefan Schneegass
  • Florian Alt
  • Michael Rohs

Externe Organisationen

  • Universität Stuttgart
  • Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU)
Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Titel des SammelwerksAH '14
UntertitelProceedings of the 5th Augmented Human International Conference
Herausgeber (Verlag)Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
Seiten1-8
ISBN (Print)9781450327619
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 7 März 2014
Veranstaltung5th Augmented Human International Conference, AH 2014 - Kobe, Japan
Dauer: 7 März 20148 März 2014

Abstract

Free-hand interaction with large displays is getting more common, for example in public settings and exertion games. Adding haptic feedback offers the potential for more realistic and immersive experiences. While vibrotactile feedback is well known, electrical muscle stimulation (EMS) has not yet been explored in free-hand interaction with large displays. EMS offers a wide range of different strengths and qualities of haptic feedback. In this paper we first systematically investigate the design space for haptic feedback. Second, we experimentally explore differences between strengths of EMS and vibrotactile feedback. Third, based on the results, we evaluate EMS and vibrotactile feedback with regard to different virtual objects (soft, hard) and interaction with different gestures (touch, grasp, punch) in front of a large display. The results provide a basis for the design of haptic feedback that is appropriate for the given type of interaction and the material.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Zitieren

Let Me Grab This: A Comparison of EMS and Vibration for Haptic Feedback in Free-Hand Interaction. / Pfeiffer, Max; Schneegass, Stefan; Alt, Florian et al.
AH '14: Proceedings of the 5th Augmented Human International Conference. Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), 2014. S. 1-8 48.

Publikation: Beitrag in Buch/Bericht/Sammelwerk/KonferenzbandAufsatz in KonferenzbandForschungPeer-Review

Pfeiffer, M, Schneegass, S, Alt, F & Rohs, M 2014, Let Me Grab This: A Comparison of EMS and Vibration for Haptic Feedback in Free-Hand Interaction. in AH '14: Proceedings of the 5th Augmented Human International Conference., 48, Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), S. 1-8, 5th Augmented Human International Conference, AH 2014, Kobe, Japan, 7 März 2014. https://doi.org/10.1145/2582051.2582099
Pfeiffer, M., Schneegass, S., Alt, F., & Rohs, M. (2014). Let Me Grab This: A Comparison of EMS and Vibration for Haptic Feedback in Free-Hand Interaction. In AH '14: Proceedings of the 5th Augmented Human International Conference (S. 1-8). Artikel 48 Association for Computing Machinery (ACM). https://doi.org/10.1145/2582051.2582099
Pfeiffer M, Schneegass S, Alt F, Rohs M. Let Me Grab This: A Comparison of EMS and Vibration for Haptic Feedback in Free-Hand Interaction. in AH '14: Proceedings of the 5th Augmented Human International Conference. Association for Computing Machinery (ACM). 2014. S. 1-8. 48 doi: 10.1145/2582051.2582099
Pfeiffer, Max ; Schneegass, Stefan ; Alt, Florian et al. / Let Me Grab This : A Comparison of EMS and Vibration for Haptic Feedback in Free-Hand Interaction. AH '14: Proceedings of the 5th Augmented Human International Conference. Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), 2014. S. 1-8
Download
@inproceedings{c2a83cd8245043b1b28201dc0c7b088a,
title = "Let Me Grab This: A Comparison of EMS and Vibration for Haptic Feedback in Free-Hand Interaction",
abstract = "Free-hand interaction with large displays is getting more common, for example in public settings and exertion games. Adding haptic feedback offers the potential for more realistic and immersive experiences. While vibrotactile feedback is well known, electrical muscle stimulation (EMS) has not yet been explored in free-hand interaction with large displays. EMS offers a wide range of different strengths and qualities of haptic feedback. In this paper we first systematically investigate the design space for haptic feedback. Second, we experimentally explore differences between strengths of EMS and vibrotactile feedback. Third, based on the results, we evaluate EMS and vibrotactile feedback with regard to different virtual objects (soft, hard) and interaction with different gestures (touch, grasp, punch) in front of a large display. The results provide a basis for the design of haptic feedback that is appropriate for the given type of interaction and the material.",
keywords = "Electrical muscle stimulation, Free-hand interaction, Haptic feedback, Large displays, Tactile feedback",
author = "Max Pfeiffer and Stefan Schneegass and Florian Alt and Michael Rohs",
note = "Copyright: Copyright 2014 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.; 5th Augmented Human International Conference, AH 2014 ; Conference date: 07-03-2014 Through 08-03-2014",
year = "2014",
month = mar,
day = "7",
doi = "10.1145/2582051.2582099",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781450327619",
pages = "1--8",
booktitle = "AH '14",
publisher = "Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)",
address = "United States",

}

Download

TY - GEN

T1 - Let Me Grab This

T2 - 5th Augmented Human International Conference, AH 2014

AU - Pfeiffer, Max

AU - Schneegass, Stefan

AU - Alt, Florian

AU - Rohs, Michael

N1 - Copyright: Copyright 2014 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

PY - 2014/3/7

Y1 - 2014/3/7

N2 - Free-hand interaction with large displays is getting more common, for example in public settings and exertion games. Adding haptic feedback offers the potential for more realistic and immersive experiences. While vibrotactile feedback is well known, electrical muscle stimulation (EMS) has not yet been explored in free-hand interaction with large displays. EMS offers a wide range of different strengths and qualities of haptic feedback. In this paper we first systematically investigate the design space for haptic feedback. Second, we experimentally explore differences between strengths of EMS and vibrotactile feedback. Third, based on the results, we evaluate EMS and vibrotactile feedback with regard to different virtual objects (soft, hard) and interaction with different gestures (touch, grasp, punch) in front of a large display. The results provide a basis for the design of haptic feedback that is appropriate for the given type of interaction and the material.

AB - Free-hand interaction with large displays is getting more common, for example in public settings and exertion games. Adding haptic feedback offers the potential for more realistic and immersive experiences. While vibrotactile feedback is well known, electrical muscle stimulation (EMS) has not yet been explored in free-hand interaction with large displays. EMS offers a wide range of different strengths and qualities of haptic feedback. In this paper we first systematically investigate the design space for haptic feedback. Second, we experimentally explore differences between strengths of EMS and vibrotactile feedback. Third, based on the results, we evaluate EMS and vibrotactile feedback with regard to different virtual objects (soft, hard) and interaction with different gestures (touch, grasp, punch) in front of a large display. The results provide a basis for the design of haptic feedback that is appropriate for the given type of interaction and the material.

KW - Electrical muscle stimulation

KW - Free-hand interaction

KW - Haptic feedback

KW - Large displays

KW - Tactile feedback

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84899856907&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1145/2582051.2582099

DO - 10.1145/2582051.2582099

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:84899856907

SN - 9781450327619

SP - 1

EP - 8

BT - AH '14

PB - Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Y2 - 7 March 2014 through 8 March 2014

ER -