Legal Perspectives on Post-mortem Use of Biomaterial and Data for Research: A Focus on the German Situation

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftÜbersichtsarbeitForschungPeer-Review

Autoren

  • Stefanie Hänold
  • Nikolaus Forgó
  • Dania Kobeissi
  • Iheanyi Nwankwo
Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)311-327
Seitenumfang17
FachzeitschriftEuropean Journal of Health Law
Jahrgang24
Ausgabenummer3
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 31 Mai 2017

Abstract

Analyses of biobank informed consent forms show that most of them do not include provisions for post-mortem use of biomaterial and data obtained from a donor who later dies. When these biobanks are confronted with issues of secondary use of these bioresources for research, especially when not completely anonymised, or when genetic research is involved which could reveal not only the identity of the donor, but also those of his biological relatives, they are often confused. Looking at the existing regulatory framework of biobanks, we conclude that no clear guidelines exist on this issue. Although the donor has died, his interests are not completely extinguished. Other interests-Those of his biological relatives, researchers, and the public at large may also crop up. Legal reform and clear indications of post-mortem use in the consent document are needed to give donors the opportunity to consider all the implications.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Ziele für nachhaltige Entwicklung

Zitieren

Legal Perspectives on Post-mortem Use of Biomaterial and Data for Research: A Focus on the German Situation. / Hänold, Stefanie; Forgó, Nikolaus; Kobeissi, Dania et al.
in: European Journal of Health Law, Jahrgang 24, Nr. 3, 31.05.2017, S. 311-327.

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftÜbersichtsarbeitForschungPeer-Review

Hänold, S, Forgó, N, Kobeissi, D & Nwankwo, I 2017, 'Legal Perspectives on Post-mortem Use of Biomaterial and Data for Research: A Focus on the German Situation', European Journal of Health Law, Jg. 24, Nr. 3, S. 311-327. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718093-12341415
Hänold, S., Forgó, N., Kobeissi, D., & Nwankwo, I. (2017). Legal Perspectives on Post-mortem Use of Biomaterial and Data for Research: A Focus on the German Situation. European Journal of Health Law, 24(3), 311-327. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718093-12341415
Hänold S, Forgó N, Kobeissi D, Nwankwo I. Legal Perspectives on Post-mortem Use of Biomaterial and Data for Research: A Focus on the German Situation. European Journal of Health Law. 2017 Mai 31;24(3):311-327. doi: 10.1163/15718093-12341415
Hänold, Stefanie ; Forgó, Nikolaus ; Kobeissi, Dania et al. / Legal Perspectives on Post-mortem Use of Biomaterial and Data for Research : A Focus on the German Situation. in: European Journal of Health Law. 2017 ; Jahrgang 24, Nr. 3. S. 311-327.
Download
@article{33d549e9fc95477881052c069cfdf04b,
title = "Legal Perspectives on Post-mortem Use of Biomaterial and Data for Research: A Focus on the German Situation",
abstract = "Analyses of biobank informed consent forms show that most of them do not include provisions for post-mortem use of biomaterial and data obtained from a donor who later dies. When these biobanks are confronted with issues of secondary use of these bioresources for research, especially when not completely anonymised, or when genetic research is involved which could reveal not only the identity of the donor, but also those of his biological relatives, they are often confused. Looking at the existing regulatory framework of biobanks, we conclude that no clear guidelines exist on this issue. Although the donor has died, his interests are not completely extinguished. Other interests-Those of his biological relatives, researchers, and the public at large may also crop up. Legal reform and clear indications of post-mortem use in the consent document are needed to give donors the opportunity to consider all the implications.",
keywords = "biobank framework, data protection, informed consent, post-mortem bioresources",
author = "Stefanie H{\"a}nold and Nikolaus Forg{\'o} and Dania Kobeissi and Iheanyi Nwankwo",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2016 Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands.",
year = "2017",
month = may,
day = "31",
doi = "10.1163/15718093-12341415",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "311--327",
number = "3",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Legal Perspectives on Post-mortem Use of Biomaterial and Data for Research

T2 - A Focus on the German Situation

AU - Hänold, Stefanie

AU - Forgó, Nikolaus

AU - Kobeissi, Dania

AU - Nwankwo, Iheanyi

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2016 Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands.

PY - 2017/5/31

Y1 - 2017/5/31

N2 - Analyses of biobank informed consent forms show that most of them do not include provisions for post-mortem use of biomaterial and data obtained from a donor who later dies. When these biobanks are confronted with issues of secondary use of these bioresources for research, especially when not completely anonymised, or when genetic research is involved which could reveal not only the identity of the donor, but also those of his biological relatives, they are often confused. Looking at the existing regulatory framework of biobanks, we conclude that no clear guidelines exist on this issue. Although the donor has died, his interests are not completely extinguished. Other interests-Those of his biological relatives, researchers, and the public at large may also crop up. Legal reform and clear indications of post-mortem use in the consent document are needed to give donors the opportunity to consider all the implications.

AB - Analyses of biobank informed consent forms show that most of them do not include provisions for post-mortem use of biomaterial and data obtained from a donor who later dies. When these biobanks are confronted with issues of secondary use of these bioresources for research, especially when not completely anonymised, or when genetic research is involved which could reveal not only the identity of the donor, but also those of his biological relatives, they are often confused. Looking at the existing regulatory framework of biobanks, we conclude that no clear guidelines exist on this issue. Although the donor has died, his interests are not completely extinguished. Other interests-Those of his biological relatives, researchers, and the public at large may also crop up. Legal reform and clear indications of post-mortem use in the consent document are needed to give donors the opportunity to consider all the implications.

KW - biobank framework

KW - data protection

KW - informed consent

KW - post-mortem bioresources

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85020447965&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1163/15718093-12341415

DO - 10.1163/15718093-12341415

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85020447965

VL - 24

SP - 311

EP - 327

JO - European Journal of Health Law

JF - European Journal of Health Law

SN - 0929-0273

IS - 3

ER -