Land subsidence in Jakarta and Semarang Bay: The relationship between physical processes, risk perception, and household adaptation

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Autoren

  • Lisa Michéle Bott
  • Tilo Schöne
  • Julia Illigner
  • Mahmud Haghshenas Haghighi
  • Konstantin Gisevius
  • Boris Braun

Externe Organisationen

  • Universität zu Köln
  • Helmholtz-Zentrum Potsdam Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum (GFZ)
Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Aufsatznummer105775
FachzeitschriftOcean and Coastal Management
Jahrgang211
Frühes Online-Datum23 Juni 2021
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 1 Okt. 2021
Extern publiziertJa

Abstract

Sea level rise (SLR) is among the most pressing challenges for urban coastal areas. While geocentric (eustatic) SLR receives widespread attention in politics and media, relative SLR at the coast, mainly caused by land subsidence, is still comparatively under-researched despite much higher rates. This paper introduces a combined natural and social science study to bring subsidence more to the forefront of coastal hazard research. We use data from radar altimetry, GNSS controlled tide gauge stations, and InSAR mapping to characterize regional and relative SLR at Jakarta and Semarang Bay, and focus-group discussions and a standardized household survey to analyze risk perceptions and adaptation. Our analysis of InSAR, radar altimetry, and corrected tide gauges clearly identifies subsidence as the major coastal threat in our study areas. The InSAR analysis for Semarang shows stable trends of subsidence up to ~100 mm/a. For Jakarta, our analysis reveals more complex spatial and temporal patterns with rates around 60 mm/a; revealing significant changes to previous studies. Our analysis of radar altimetry data since 1993 shows a moderate regional SLR of 2.1 mm/a off Semarang and 3.2 mm/a off Jakarta. The InSAR data are integrated into our statistical analysis of household responses towards subsidence. We found, that in contrast to fast-onset events, constantly proceeding subsidence becomes normalized in peoples’ perceptions and responses are integrated into day-to-day habits. Thus, risk perception is a far lesser determinant of responses towards subsidence than it is for fast-onset events. Hence, our results relativize former assumptions that risk perception and not actual exposure lead to action. Moreover, we found that local people are not willing to vacate highly exposed areas. Their views need to be included in municipal disaster risk reduction, the urgency of which clearly lies on mitigating subsidence effects rather than on building protection against regionally rising sea levels.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Ziele für nachhaltige Entwicklung

Zitieren

Land subsidence in Jakarta and Semarang Bay: The relationship between physical processes, risk perception, and household adaptation. / Bott, Lisa Michéle; Schöne, Tilo; Illigner, Julia et al.
in: Ocean and Coastal Management, Jahrgang 211, 105775, 01.10.2021.

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Bott LM, Schöne T, Illigner J, Haghshenas Haghighi M, Gisevius K, Braun B. Land subsidence in Jakarta and Semarang Bay: The relationship between physical processes, risk perception, and household adaptation. Ocean and Coastal Management. 2021 Okt 1;211:105775. Epub 2021 Jun 23. doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2021.105775
Download
@article{365332e75c654cd7adb69c7bdd5a78d5,
title = "Land subsidence in Jakarta and Semarang Bay: The relationship between physical processes, risk perception, and household adaptation",
abstract = "Sea level rise (SLR) is among the most pressing challenges for urban coastal areas. While geocentric (eustatic) SLR receives widespread attention in politics and media, relative SLR at the coast, mainly caused by land subsidence, is still comparatively under-researched despite much higher rates. This paper introduces a combined natural and social science study to bring subsidence more to the forefront of coastal hazard research. We use data from radar altimetry, GNSS controlled tide gauge stations, and InSAR mapping to characterize regional and relative SLR at Jakarta and Semarang Bay, and focus-group discussions and a standardized household survey to analyze risk perceptions and adaptation. Our analysis of InSAR, radar altimetry, and corrected tide gauges clearly identifies subsidence as the major coastal threat in our study areas. The InSAR analysis for Semarang shows stable trends of subsidence up to ~100 mm/a. For Jakarta, our analysis reveals more complex spatial and temporal patterns with rates around 60 mm/a; revealing significant changes to previous studies. Our analysis of radar altimetry data since 1993 shows a moderate regional SLR of 2.1 mm/a off Semarang and 3.2 mm/a off Jakarta. The InSAR data are integrated into our statistical analysis of household responses towards subsidence. We found, that in contrast to fast-onset events, constantly proceeding subsidence becomes normalized in peoples{\textquoteright} perceptions and responses are integrated into day-to-day habits. Thus, risk perception is a far lesser determinant of responses towards subsidence than it is for fast-onset events. Hence, our results relativize former assumptions that risk perception and not actual exposure lead to action. Moreover, we found that local people are not willing to vacate highly exposed areas. Their views need to be included in municipal disaster risk reduction, the urgency of which clearly lies on mitigating subsidence effects rather than on building protection against regionally rising sea levels.",
keywords = "Adaptation, Coastal flooding, InSAR mapping, Risk perception, Sea level rise",
author = "Bott, {Lisa Mich{\'e}le} and Tilo Sch{\"o}ne and Julia Illigner and {Haghshenas Haghighi}, Mahmud and Konstantin Gisevius and Boris Braun",
note = "Funding Information: This research has been funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG) under the SPP-1889 ?Regional Sea Level Change and Society? (BR1678/14-1, SCHO1136/1-1). The projected sea level data for different climate scenarios are from IPCC AR5 distributed in netCDF format by the Integrated Climate Data Center (ICDC, icdc.cen.uni-hamburg.de), University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany (downloaded September 10, 2020). The social science fieldwork was supported by the Gadjah Mada University, the Diponegoro University, and the University of Indonesia. We thank Muh Aris Marfai, Thomas Putranto, Muhammad Helmi, Eko Kusratmoko, Nurul Sri Rahatiningtyas, and Nurrokhmah Rizqihandari for supporting our field research. We thank our Indonesian colleagues Hasanuddin Abidin (BIG and ITB Bandung), Bayu Triyogo Widyantoro and Irpan Septiawan (both BIG) and Heri Andreas (ITB Bandung) for sharing data and supporting our operations in Indonesia. We thank Tony Reimann for his comments on earlier versions of this paper. Furthermore, we thank all Indonesian participants for sharing their knowledge and insights. ",
year = "2021",
month = oct,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2021.105775",
language = "English",
volume = "211",
journal = "Ocean and Coastal Management",
issn = "0964-5691",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Land subsidence in Jakarta and Semarang Bay

T2 - The relationship between physical processes, risk perception, and household adaptation

AU - Bott, Lisa Michéle

AU - Schöne, Tilo

AU - Illigner, Julia

AU - Haghshenas Haghighi, Mahmud

AU - Gisevius, Konstantin

AU - Braun, Boris

N1 - Funding Information: This research has been funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG) under the SPP-1889 ?Regional Sea Level Change and Society? (BR1678/14-1, SCHO1136/1-1). The projected sea level data for different climate scenarios are from IPCC AR5 distributed in netCDF format by the Integrated Climate Data Center (ICDC, icdc.cen.uni-hamburg.de), University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany (downloaded September 10, 2020). The social science fieldwork was supported by the Gadjah Mada University, the Diponegoro University, and the University of Indonesia. We thank Muh Aris Marfai, Thomas Putranto, Muhammad Helmi, Eko Kusratmoko, Nurul Sri Rahatiningtyas, and Nurrokhmah Rizqihandari for supporting our field research. We thank our Indonesian colleagues Hasanuddin Abidin (BIG and ITB Bandung), Bayu Triyogo Widyantoro and Irpan Septiawan (both BIG) and Heri Andreas (ITB Bandung) for sharing data and supporting our operations in Indonesia. We thank Tony Reimann for his comments on earlier versions of this paper. Furthermore, we thank all Indonesian participants for sharing their knowledge and insights.

PY - 2021/10/1

Y1 - 2021/10/1

N2 - Sea level rise (SLR) is among the most pressing challenges for urban coastal areas. While geocentric (eustatic) SLR receives widespread attention in politics and media, relative SLR at the coast, mainly caused by land subsidence, is still comparatively under-researched despite much higher rates. This paper introduces a combined natural and social science study to bring subsidence more to the forefront of coastal hazard research. We use data from radar altimetry, GNSS controlled tide gauge stations, and InSAR mapping to characterize regional and relative SLR at Jakarta and Semarang Bay, and focus-group discussions and a standardized household survey to analyze risk perceptions and adaptation. Our analysis of InSAR, radar altimetry, and corrected tide gauges clearly identifies subsidence as the major coastal threat in our study areas. The InSAR analysis for Semarang shows stable trends of subsidence up to ~100 mm/a. For Jakarta, our analysis reveals more complex spatial and temporal patterns with rates around 60 mm/a; revealing significant changes to previous studies. Our analysis of radar altimetry data since 1993 shows a moderate regional SLR of 2.1 mm/a off Semarang and 3.2 mm/a off Jakarta. The InSAR data are integrated into our statistical analysis of household responses towards subsidence. We found, that in contrast to fast-onset events, constantly proceeding subsidence becomes normalized in peoples’ perceptions and responses are integrated into day-to-day habits. Thus, risk perception is a far lesser determinant of responses towards subsidence than it is for fast-onset events. Hence, our results relativize former assumptions that risk perception and not actual exposure lead to action. Moreover, we found that local people are not willing to vacate highly exposed areas. Their views need to be included in municipal disaster risk reduction, the urgency of which clearly lies on mitigating subsidence effects rather than on building protection against regionally rising sea levels.

AB - Sea level rise (SLR) is among the most pressing challenges for urban coastal areas. While geocentric (eustatic) SLR receives widespread attention in politics and media, relative SLR at the coast, mainly caused by land subsidence, is still comparatively under-researched despite much higher rates. This paper introduces a combined natural and social science study to bring subsidence more to the forefront of coastal hazard research. We use data from radar altimetry, GNSS controlled tide gauge stations, and InSAR mapping to characterize regional and relative SLR at Jakarta and Semarang Bay, and focus-group discussions and a standardized household survey to analyze risk perceptions and adaptation. Our analysis of InSAR, radar altimetry, and corrected tide gauges clearly identifies subsidence as the major coastal threat in our study areas. The InSAR analysis for Semarang shows stable trends of subsidence up to ~100 mm/a. For Jakarta, our analysis reveals more complex spatial and temporal patterns with rates around 60 mm/a; revealing significant changes to previous studies. Our analysis of radar altimetry data since 1993 shows a moderate regional SLR of 2.1 mm/a off Semarang and 3.2 mm/a off Jakarta. The InSAR data are integrated into our statistical analysis of household responses towards subsidence. We found, that in contrast to fast-onset events, constantly proceeding subsidence becomes normalized in peoples’ perceptions and responses are integrated into day-to-day habits. Thus, risk perception is a far lesser determinant of responses towards subsidence than it is for fast-onset events. Hence, our results relativize former assumptions that risk perception and not actual exposure lead to action. Moreover, we found that local people are not willing to vacate highly exposed areas. Their views need to be included in municipal disaster risk reduction, the urgency of which clearly lies on mitigating subsidence effects rather than on building protection against regionally rising sea levels.

KW - Adaptation

KW - Coastal flooding

KW - InSAR mapping

KW - Risk perception

KW - Sea level rise

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85108381328&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2021.105775

DO - 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2021.105775

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85108381328

VL - 211

JO - Ocean and Coastal Management

JF - Ocean and Coastal Management

SN - 0964-5691

M1 - 105775

ER -