Details
Originalsprache | Englisch |
---|---|
Seiten (von - bis) | 1202-1229 |
Seitenumfang | 28 |
Fachzeitschrift | Physics |
Jahrgang | 4 |
Ausgabenummer | 4 |
Publikationsstatus | Veröffentlicht - 8 Okt. 2022 |
Abstract
ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete
Zitieren
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTex
- RIS
in: Physics, Jahrgang 4, Nr. 4, 08.10.2022, S. 1202-1229.
Publikation: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift › Artikel › Forschung › Peer-Review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Key Experiment and Quantum Reasoning
AU - Waitzmann, Moritz
AU - Weber, Kim-Alessandro
AU - Weßnigk, Susanne
AU - Scholz, Rüdiger
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022 by the authors.
PY - 2022/10/8
Y1 - 2022/10/8
N2 - For around five decades, physicists have been experimenting with single quanta such as single photons. Insofar as the practised ensemble reasoning has become obsolete for the interpretation of these experiments, the non-classical intrinsic probabilistic nature of quantum theory has gained increased importance. One of the most important exclusive features of quantum physics is the undeniable existence of the superposition of states, even for single quantum objects. One known example of this effect is entanglement. In this paper, two classically contradictory phenomena are combined to one single experiment. This experiment incontestably shows that a single photon incident on an optical beam splitter can either be reflected or transmitted. The almost complete absence of coincident clicks of two photodetectors demonstrates that these two output states are incompatible. However, when combining these states using two mirrors, we can observe interference patterns in the counting rate of the single photon detector. The only explanation for this is that the two incompatible output states are prepared and kept simultaneously—a typical consequence of a quantum superposition of states. (Semi-)classical physical concepts fail here, and a full quantum concept is predestined to explain the complementary experimental outcomes for the quantum optical “non-waves” called single photons. In this paper, we intend to demonstrate that a true quantum physical key experiment (“true” in the sense that it cannot be explained by any classical physical concept), when combined with full quantum reasoning (probability, superposition and interference), influences students’ readiness to use quantum elements for interpretation.
AB - For around five decades, physicists have been experimenting with single quanta such as single photons. Insofar as the practised ensemble reasoning has become obsolete for the interpretation of these experiments, the non-classical intrinsic probabilistic nature of quantum theory has gained increased importance. One of the most important exclusive features of quantum physics is the undeniable existence of the superposition of states, even for single quantum objects. One known example of this effect is entanglement. In this paper, two classically contradictory phenomena are combined to one single experiment. This experiment incontestably shows that a single photon incident on an optical beam splitter can either be reflected or transmitted. The almost complete absence of coincident clicks of two photodetectors demonstrates that these two output states are incompatible. However, when combining these states using two mirrors, we can observe interference patterns in the counting rate of the single photon detector. The only explanation for this is that the two incompatible output states are prepared and kept simultaneously—a typical consequence of a quantum superposition of states. (Semi-)classical physical concepts fail here, and a full quantum concept is predestined to explain the complementary experimental outcomes for the quantum optical “non-waves” called single photons. In this paper, we intend to demonstrate that a true quantum physical key experiment (“true” in the sense that it cannot be explained by any classical physical concept), when combined with full quantum reasoning (probability, superposition and interference), influences students’ readiness to use quantum elements for interpretation.
KW - key experiment
KW - nature of science
KW - physics education
KW - quantum reasoning
KW - quantum theory
KW - scientific literacy
KW - single photon experiments
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85144728469&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/physics4040078
DO - 10.3390/physics4040078
M3 - Article
VL - 4
SP - 1202
EP - 1229
JO - Physics
JF - Physics
SN - 2624-8174
IS - 4
ER -