Izvrševanje in utemeljevanje, objektivni in subjektivni podatki – Vzporednica?

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Autorschaft

Organisationseinheiten

Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

Titel in ÜbersetzungPerformance and elaboration of reasons, objective and subjective data – A parallel?
OriginalspracheSlowenisch
Seiten (von - bis)231-258
Seitenumfang28
FachzeitschriftPhainomena
Jahrgang27
Ausgabenummer104-105
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 29 Juni 2018

Abstract

Objective data are distinguished from subjective data based on formulating the expressivity of human performance and its traces, whereby subjective data result from prospective and retrospective elaboration of reasons. Objective data are further differentiated into performances of the case (type 2) and performances of the life practice encompassing it (type 1). The interpretation of objective data of type 1 and 2 has a biographical focus on the case structure in its formative process, whereas the interpretation of type 2 objective data has a motivational focus and extrapolates from the positioning of a case to its disposition. The differentiation of objective data generally fulfills the function of correcting the self-interpretation of the case and establishes the possibility of defining the reflective relation of the case to its structure. The definition of the reflective relation enriches the reconstruction of the case to the extent that it reveals the potential for transformation of the case structure.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Zitieren

Izvrševanje in utemeljevanje, objektivni in subjektivni podatki – Vzporednica? / Zizek, Boris.
in: Phainomena, Jahrgang 27, Nr. 104-105, 29.06.2018, S. 231-258.

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Zizek B. Izvrševanje in utemeljevanje, objektivni in subjektivni podatki – Vzporednica? Phainomena. 2018 Jun 29;27(104-105):231-258. doi: 10.32022/PHI27.2018.104-105.10
Zizek, Boris. / Izvrševanje in utemeljevanje, objektivni in subjektivni podatki – Vzporednica?. in: Phainomena. 2018 ; Jahrgang 27, Nr. 104-105. S. 231-258.
Download
@article{945de6baf91d44c296aeca07c735391c,
title = "Izvr{\v s}evanje in utemeljevanje, objektivni in subjektivni podatki – Vzporednica?",
abstract = "Objective data are distinguished from subjective data based on formulating the expressivity of human performance and its traces, whereby subjective data result from prospective and retrospective elaboration of reasons. Objective data are further differentiated into performances of the case (type 2) and performances of the life practice encompassing it (type 1). The interpretation of objective data of type 1 and 2 has a biographical focus on the case structure in its formative process, whereas the interpretation of type 2 objective data has a motivational focus and extrapolates from the positioning of a case to its disposition. The differentiation of objective data generally fulfills the function of correcting the self-interpretation of the case and establishes the possibility of defining the reflective relation of the case to its structure. The definition of the reflective relation enriches the reconstruction of the case to the extent that it reveals the potential for transformation of the case structure.",
keywords = "Life practice, Objective hermeneutics, Positionality, Reconstruction, Robinson Crusoe",
author = "Boris Zizek",
year = "2018",
month = jun,
day = "29",
doi = "10.32022/PHI27.2018.104-105.10",
language = "Slovenian",
volume = "27",
pages = "231--258",
number = "104-105",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Izvrševanje in utemeljevanje, objektivni in subjektivni podatki – Vzporednica?

AU - Zizek, Boris

PY - 2018/6/29

Y1 - 2018/6/29

N2 - Objective data are distinguished from subjective data based on formulating the expressivity of human performance and its traces, whereby subjective data result from prospective and retrospective elaboration of reasons. Objective data are further differentiated into performances of the case (type 2) and performances of the life practice encompassing it (type 1). The interpretation of objective data of type 1 and 2 has a biographical focus on the case structure in its formative process, whereas the interpretation of type 2 objective data has a motivational focus and extrapolates from the positioning of a case to its disposition. The differentiation of objective data generally fulfills the function of correcting the self-interpretation of the case and establishes the possibility of defining the reflective relation of the case to its structure. The definition of the reflective relation enriches the reconstruction of the case to the extent that it reveals the potential for transformation of the case structure.

AB - Objective data are distinguished from subjective data based on formulating the expressivity of human performance and its traces, whereby subjective data result from prospective and retrospective elaboration of reasons. Objective data are further differentiated into performances of the case (type 2) and performances of the life practice encompassing it (type 1). The interpretation of objective data of type 1 and 2 has a biographical focus on the case structure in its formative process, whereas the interpretation of type 2 objective data has a motivational focus and extrapolates from the positioning of a case to its disposition. The differentiation of objective data generally fulfills the function of correcting the self-interpretation of the case and establishes the possibility of defining the reflective relation of the case to its structure. The definition of the reflective relation enriches the reconstruction of the case to the extent that it reveals the potential for transformation of the case structure.

KW - Life practice

KW - Objective hermeneutics

KW - Positionality

KW - Reconstruction

KW - Robinson Crusoe

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053890610&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.32022/PHI27.2018.104-105.10

DO - 10.32022/PHI27.2018.104-105.10

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85053890610

VL - 27

SP - 231

EP - 258

JO - Phainomena

JF - Phainomena

SN - 1318-3362

IS - 104-105

ER -

Von denselben Autoren