Details
| Originalsprache | Englisch |
|---|---|
| Titel des Sammelwerks | Proceedings of the 31st USENIX Security Symposium, Security 2022 |
| Seiten | 4059-4076 |
| Seitenumfang | 18 |
| ISBN (elektronisch) | 9781939133311 |
| Publikationsstatus | Veröffentlicht - 2022 |
| Veranstaltung | 31st USENIX Security Symposium, Security 2022 - Boston, USA / Vereinigte Staaten Dauer: 10 Aug. 2022 → 12 Aug. 2022 |
Abstract
Ensuring voters' subjective trust is key to adopting any voting system. Consequently, researchers, experts, and policymakers have proposed and implemented practices to foster the trust of voters in online voting. State-of-the-art practices include security features, public information, or evaluations. However, it remains unclear how these practices affect the voters' subjective trust. Through interviews with 26 participants, this work presents the first analysis of voters' perceptions considering state-of-the-art practices that help voters determine their trust in Internet voting. Among our results, we show practices, such as expert evaluations, that we identified as mandatory. Further, we found practices, such as individual verifiability, that facilitate trust. Others, such as vote updating, have a negative impact due to unfamiliarity. We, furthermore, report misconceptions, discuss ways to address them through different information interfaces or as part of the voting software. Finally, we list recommendations for the specific realization of expedient practices to inform developers and policymakers.
ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete
- Informatik (insg.)
- Computernetzwerke und -kommunikation
- Informatik (insg.)
- Information systems
- Ingenieurwesen (insg.)
- Sicherheit, Risiko, Zuverlässigkeit und Qualität
Zitieren
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTex
- RIS
Proceedings of the 31st USENIX Security Symposium, Security 2022. 2022. S. 4059-4076.
Publikation: Beitrag in Buch/Bericht/Sammelwerk/Konferenzband › Aufsatz in Konferenzband › Forschung › Peer-Review
}
TY - GEN
T1 - Investigating State-of-the-Art Practices for Fostering Subjective Trust in Online Voting through Interviews
AU - Marky, Karola
AU - Gerber, Paul
AU - Günther, Sebastian
AU - Khamis, Mohamed
AU - Fries, Maximilian
AU - Mühlhäuser, Max
N1 - Funding Information: This work has been co-funded by the Deutsche Forschungsge-meinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation, grant number 251805230/GRK 2050) and by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research and the Hessen State Ministry for Higher Education, Research, Science and the Arts within their joint support of the National Research Center for Applied Cybersecurity ATHENE.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Ensuring voters' subjective trust is key to adopting any voting system. Consequently, researchers, experts, and policymakers have proposed and implemented practices to foster the trust of voters in online voting. State-of-the-art practices include security features, public information, or evaluations. However, it remains unclear how these practices affect the voters' subjective trust. Through interviews with 26 participants, this work presents the first analysis of voters' perceptions considering state-of-the-art practices that help voters determine their trust in Internet voting. Among our results, we show practices, such as expert evaluations, that we identified as mandatory. Further, we found practices, such as individual verifiability, that facilitate trust. Others, such as vote updating, have a negative impact due to unfamiliarity. We, furthermore, report misconceptions, discuss ways to address them through different information interfaces or as part of the voting software. Finally, we list recommendations for the specific realization of expedient practices to inform developers and policymakers.
AB - Ensuring voters' subjective trust is key to adopting any voting system. Consequently, researchers, experts, and policymakers have proposed and implemented practices to foster the trust of voters in online voting. State-of-the-art practices include security features, public information, or evaluations. However, it remains unclear how these practices affect the voters' subjective trust. Through interviews with 26 participants, this work presents the first analysis of voters' perceptions considering state-of-the-art practices that help voters determine their trust in Internet voting. Among our results, we show practices, such as expert evaluations, that we identified as mandatory. Further, we found practices, such as individual verifiability, that facilitate trust. Others, such as vote updating, have a negative impact due to unfamiliarity. We, furthermore, report misconceptions, discuss ways to address them through different information interfaces or as part of the voting software. Finally, we list recommendations for the specific realization of expedient practices to inform developers and policymakers.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85140958228&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85140958228
SP - 4059
EP - 4076
BT - Proceedings of the 31st USENIX Security Symposium, Security 2022
T2 - 31st USENIX Security Symposium, Security 2022
Y2 - 10 August 2022 through 12 August 2022
ER -