Intrinsic Quality Assessment of Arguments

Publikation: Beitrag in Buch/Bericht/Sammelwerk/KonferenzbandAufsatz in KonferenzbandForschung

Autoren

Externe Organisationen

  • Universität Paderborn
Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Titel des SammelwerksCOLING 2020 - 28th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Proceedings of the Conference
Herausgeber/-innenDonia Scott, Nuria Bel, Chengqing Zong
Seiten6739-6745
Seitenumfang7
ISBN (elektronisch)9781952148279
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 2020
Extern publiziertJa
Veranstaltung28th International Conference on Computational Linguistics - Barcelona (Online), Spanien
Dauer: 8 Dez. 202013 Dez. 2020

Abstract

Several quality dimensions of natural language arguments have been investigated. Some are likely to be reflected in linguistic features (e.g., an argument’s arrangement), whereas others depend on context (e.g., relevance) or topic knowledge (e.g., acceptability). In this paper, we study the intrinsic computational assessment of 15 dimensions, i.e., only learning from an argument’s text. In systematic experiments with eight feature types on an existing corpus, we observe moderate but significant learning success for most dimensions. Rhetorical quality seems hardest to assess, and subjectivity features turn out strong, although length bias in the corpus impedes full validity. We also find that human assessors differ more clearly to each other than to our approach.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Zitieren

Intrinsic Quality Assessment of Arguments. / Wachsmuth, Henning; Werner, Till.
COLING 2020 - 28th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Proceedings of the Conference. Hrsg. / Donia Scott; Nuria Bel; Chengqing Zong. 2020. S. 6739-6745.

Publikation: Beitrag in Buch/Bericht/Sammelwerk/KonferenzbandAufsatz in KonferenzbandForschung

Wachsmuth, H & Werner, T 2020, Intrinsic Quality Assessment of Arguments. in D Scott, N Bel & C Zong (Hrsg.), COLING 2020 - 28th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Proceedings of the Conference. S. 6739-6745, 28th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Barcelona (Online), Spanien, 8 Dez. 2020. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.coling-main.592
Wachsmuth, H., & Werner, T. (2020). Intrinsic Quality Assessment of Arguments. In D. Scott, N. Bel, & C. Zong (Hrsg.), COLING 2020 - 28th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Proceedings of the Conference (S. 6739-6745) https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.coling-main.592
Wachsmuth H, Werner T. Intrinsic Quality Assessment of Arguments. in Scott D, Bel N, Zong C, Hrsg., COLING 2020 - 28th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Proceedings of the Conference. 2020. S. 6739-6745 doi: 10.18653/v1/2020.coling-main.592
Wachsmuth, Henning ; Werner, Till. / Intrinsic Quality Assessment of Arguments. COLING 2020 - 28th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Proceedings of the Conference. Hrsg. / Donia Scott ; Nuria Bel ; Chengqing Zong. 2020. S. 6739-6745
Download
@inproceedings{e8fbec912d314a4eb8f6c9b2cf331991,
title = "Intrinsic Quality Assessment of Arguments",
abstract = "Several quality dimensions of natural language arguments have been investigated. Some are likely to be reflected in linguistic features (e.g., an argument{\textquoteright}s arrangement), whereas others depend on context (e.g., relevance) or topic knowledge (e.g., acceptability). In this paper, we study the intrinsic computational assessment of 15 dimensions, i.e., only learning from an argument{\textquoteright}s text. In systematic experiments with eight feature types on an existing corpus, we observe moderate but significant learning success for most dimensions. Rhetorical quality seems hardest to assess, and subjectivity features turn out strong, although length bias in the corpus impedes full validity. We also find that human assessors differ more clearly to each other than to our approach.",
author = "Henning Wachsmuth and Till Werner",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2020 COLING 2020 - 28th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Proceedings of the Conference. All rights reserved.; 28th International Conference on Computational Linguistics ; Conference date: 08-12-2020 Through 13-12-2020",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.18653/v1/2020.coling-main.592",
language = "English",
pages = "6739--6745",
editor = "Donia Scott and Nuria Bel and Chengqing Zong",
booktitle = "COLING 2020 - 28th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Proceedings of the Conference",

}

Download

TY - GEN

T1 - Intrinsic Quality Assessment of Arguments

AU - Wachsmuth, Henning

AU - Werner, Till

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2020 COLING 2020 - 28th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Proceedings of the Conference. All rights reserved.

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - Several quality dimensions of natural language arguments have been investigated. Some are likely to be reflected in linguistic features (e.g., an argument’s arrangement), whereas others depend on context (e.g., relevance) or topic knowledge (e.g., acceptability). In this paper, we study the intrinsic computational assessment of 15 dimensions, i.e., only learning from an argument’s text. In systematic experiments with eight feature types on an existing corpus, we observe moderate but significant learning success for most dimensions. Rhetorical quality seems hardest to assess, and subjectivity features turn out strong, although length bias in the corpus impedes full validity. We also find that human assessors differ more clearly to each other than to our approach.

AB - Several quality dimensions of natural language arguments have been investigated. Some are likely to be reflected in linguistic features (e.g., an argument’s arrangement), whereas others depend on context (e.g., relevance) or topic knowledge (e.g., acceptability). In this paper, we study the intrinsic computational assessment of 15 dimensions, i.e., only learning from an argument’s text. In systematic experiments with eight feature types on an existing corpus, we observe moderate but significant learning success for most dimensions. Rhetorical quality seems hardest to assess, and subjectivity features turn out strong, although length bias in the corpus impedes full validity. We also find that human assessors differ more clearly to each other than to our approach.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85101482308&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.18653/v1/2020.coling-main.592

DO - 10.18653/v1/2020.coling-main.592

M3 - Conference contribution

SP - 6739

EP - 6745

BT - COLING 2020 - 28th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Proceedings of the Conference

A2 - Scott, Donia

A2 - Bel, Nuria

A2 - Zong, Chengqing

T2 - 28th International Conference on Computational Linguistics

Y2 - 8 December 2020 through 13 December 2020

ER -

Von denselben Autoren