Internet intermediaries and copyright enforcement in the EU: In search of a balanced approach

Publikation: Beitrag in Buch/Bericht/Sammelwerk/KonferenzbandBeitrag in Buch/SammelwerkForschungPeer-Review

Autoren

  • Ioannis Revolidis

Organisationseinheiten

Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Titel des SammelwerksPerspectives in Law, Business and Innovation
Seiten223-248
Seitenumfang26
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 5 Sept. 2017

Publikationsreihe

NamePerspectives in Law, Business and Innovation
ISSN (Print)2520-1875
ISSN (elektronisch)2520-1883

Abstract

Ever since the commercialization of the Internet, the role of Internet intermediaries has been of vital importance for the functioning of the globalized electronic market and the innovation technologies of information dissemination in general. The importance of the role of the Internet intermediaries has been reflected in the basic legislative initiatives regarding the Internet worldwide. In Europe, following the example of the Communications Decency Act (CDA) and Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) in the United States, Articles 12–15 of the E-Commerce Directive aimed to create an immunity regime that would allow the Internet intermediaries to develop their activities without being hindered by the fear of complex liability issues connected with their sensitive role. At the same time, though, it became apparent that Internet intermediaries are playing a pivotal role in the protection of intellectual property rights in an online world, as they are in the best position to either prevent or bring intellectual property infringements to an end. This observation was also reflected in the EU legislation, as Articles 12, 13 and 14 of the E-Commerce Directive, Article 8 of the InfoSoc Directive and Article 9 and 11 of the Enforcement Directive provide for a series of interim measures that allow legal action against Internet intermediaries for alleged copyright infringements by third parties (even if the Internet intermediaries are not liable per se). This chapter will first try to highlight what are the current patterns dictated by the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) regarding the role of Internet intermediaries in the enforcement of intellectual property rights and then attempt to assess whether these patterns correspond to the legislative motives and purposes behind the respective EU legislation.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Zitieren

Internet intermediaries and copyright enforcement in the EU: In search of a balanced approach. / Revolidis, Ioannis.
Perspectives in Law, Business and Innovation. 2017. S. 223-248 (Perspectives in Law, Business and Innovation).

Publikation: Beitrag in Buch/Bericht/Sammelwerk/KonferenzbandBeitrag in Buch/SammelwerkForschungPeer-Review

Revolidis, I 2017, Internet intermediaries and copyright enforcement in the EU: In search of a balanced approach. in Perspectives in Law, Business and Innovation. Perspectives in Law, Business and Innovation, S. 223-248. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5038-1_9
Revolidis, I. (2017). Internet intermediaries and copyright enforcement in the EU: In search of a balanced approach. In Perspectives in Law, Business and Innovation (S. 223-248). (Perspectives in Law, Business and Innovation). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5038-1_9
Revolidis I. Internet intermediaries and copyright enforcement in the EU: In search of a balanced approach. in Perspectives in Law, Business and Innovation. 2017. S. 223-248. (Perspectives in Law, Business and Innovation). doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-5038-1_9
Revolidis, Ioannis. / Internet intermediaries and copyright enforcement in the EU : In search of a balanced approach. Perspectives in Law, Business and Innovation. 2017. S. 223-248 (Perspectives in Law, Business and Innovation).
Download
@inbook{9d45717fe02e4c4fa00f360397c95f1b,
title = "Internet intermediaries and copyright enforcement in the EU: In search of a balanced approach",
abstract = "Ever since the commercialization of the Internet, the role of Internet intermediaries has been of vital importance for the functioning of the globalized electronic market and the innovation technologies of information dissemination in general. The importance of the role of the Internet intermediaries has been reflected in the basic legislative initiatives regarding the Internet worldwide. In Europe, following the example of the Communications Decency Act (CDA) and Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) in the United States, Articles 12–15 of the E-Commerce Directive aimed to create an immunity regime that would allow the Internet intermediaries to develop their activities without being hindered by the fear of complex liability issues connected with their sensitive role. At the same time, though, it became apparent that Internet intermediaries are playing a pivotal role in the protection of intellectual property rights in an online world, as they are in the best position to either prevent or bring intellectual property infringements to an end. This observation was also reflected in the EU legislation, as Articles 12, 13 and 14 of the E-Commerce Directive, Article 8 of the InfoSoc Directive and Article 9 and 11 of the Enforcement Directive provide for a series of interim measures that allow legal action against Internet intermediaries for alleged copyright infringements by third parties (even if the Internet intermediaries are not liable per se). This chapter will first try to highlight what are the current patterns dictated by the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) regarding the role of Internet intermediaries in the enforcement of intellectual property rights and then attempt to assess whether these patterns correspond to the legislative motives and purposes behind the respective EU legislation.",
keywords = "Copyright enforcement online, E-Commerce, EU fundamental rights, Injunctions against internet intermediaries, Internet intermediaries",
author = "Ioannis Revolidis",
note = "Funding Information: Acknowledgements The author would like to thank the Onassis Foundation for supporting his PhD research since 2014.",
year = "2017",
month = sep,
day = "5",
doi = "10.1007/978-981-10-5038-1_9",
language = "English",
series = "Perspectives in Law, Business and Innovation",
pages = "223--248",
booktitle = "Perspectives in Law, Business and Innovation",

}

Download

TY - CHAP

T1 - Internet intermediaries and copyright enforcement in the EU

T2 - In search of a balanced approach

AU - Revolidis, Ioannis

N1 - Funding Information: Acknowledgements The author would like to thank the Onassis Foundation for supporting his PhD research since 2014.

PY - 2017/9/5

Y1 - 2017/9/5

N2 - Ever since the commercialization of the Internet, the role of Internet intermediaries has been of vital importance for the functioning of the globalized electronic market and the innovation technologies of information dissemination in general. The importance of the role of the Internet intermediaries has been reflected in the basic legislative initiatives regarding the Internet worldwide. In Europe, following the example of the Communications Decency Act (CDA) and Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) in the United States, Articles 12–15 of the E-Commerce Directive aimed to create an immunity regime that would allow the Internet intermediaries to develop their activities without being hindered by the fear of complex liability issues connected with their sensitive role. At the same time, though, it became apparent that Internet intermediaries are playing a pivotal role in the protection of intellectual property rights in an online world, as they are in the best position to either prevent or bring intellectual property infringements to an end. This observation was also reflected in the EU legislation, as Articles 12, 13 and 14 of the E-Commerce Directive, Article 8 of the InfoSoc Directive and Article 9 and 11 of the Enforcement Directive provide for a series of interim measures that allow legal action against Internet intermediaries for alleged copyright infringements by third parties (even if the Internet intermediaries are not liable per se). This chapter will first try to highlight what are the current patterns dictated by the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) regarding the role of Internet intermediaries in the enforcement of intellectual property rights and then attempt to assess whether these patterns correspond to the legislative motives and purposes behind the respective EU legislation.

AB - Ever since the commercialization of the Internet, the role of Internet intermediaries has been of vital importance for the functioning of the globalized electronic market and the innovation technologies of information dissemination in general. The importance of the role of the Internet intermediaries has been reflected in the basic legislative initiatives regarding the Internet worldwide. In Europe, following the example of the Communications Decency Act (CDA) and Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) in the United States, Articles 12–15 of the E-Commerce Directive aimed to create an immunity regime that would allow the Internet intermediaries to develop their activities without being hindered by the fear of complex liability issues connected with their sensitive role. At the same time, though, it became apparent that Internet intermediaries are playing a pivotal role in the protection of intellectual property rights in an online world, as they are in the best position to either prevent or bring intellectual property infringements to an end. This observation was also reflected in the EU legislation, as Articles 12, 13 and 14 of the E-Commerce Directive, Article 8 of the InfoSoc Directive and Article 9 and 11 of the Enforcement Directive provide for a series of interim measures that allow legal action against Internet intermediaries for alleged copyright infringements by third parties (even if the Internet intermediaries are not liable per se). This chapter will first try to highlight what are the current patterns dictated by the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) regarding the role of Internet intermediaries in the enforcement of intellectual property rights and then attempt to assess whether these patterns correspond to the legislative motives and purposes behind the respective EU legislation.

KW - Copyright enforcement online

KW - E-Commerce

KW - EU fundamental rights

KW - Injunctions against internet intermediaries

KW - Internet intermediaries

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075862348&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-981-10-5038-1_9

DO - 10.1007/978-981-10-5038-1_9

M3 - Contribution to book/anthology

AN - SCOPUS:85075862348

T3 - Perspectives in Law, Business and Innovation

SP - 223

EP - 248

BT - Perspectives in Law, Business and Innovation

ER -