Details
| Titel in Übersetzung | Urban riverscapes as integrated field of planning—coordination and cooperation and the influence of planning practice |
|---|---|
| Originalsprache | Deutsch |
| Seiten (von - bis) | 23-38 |
| Seitenumfang | 16 |
| Fachzeitschrift | Raumforschung und Raumordnung |
| Jahrgang | 74 |
| Ausgabenummer | 1 |
| Publikationsstatus | Veröffentlicht - 28 Feb. 2016 |
Abstract
In urban riverscapes different significant land uses and interests come together, for instance flood protection, environmental protection, tourism or local recreation, nature or monument conservation, waterfront development or climate change mitigation. Accordingly, planning for integrated spatial developments is required for which actors of different administrative units need to collaborate. This paper first shows the institutional requirements for a collaborative approach in riverscapes. Therefore the administrative organization and the legally based objectives and planning instruments are analyzed. Based on planning culture as analytical perspective, further informal and more cultural influence factors of cooperation are included. Following the examples of integrated development planning in the riverscapes of Nuremberg and Ratisbon, some interesting characteristics of two key organizations—water management authorities and city administrations—were pointed out by highlighting their guiding principles, their organization-specific perceptions, and validations as well as their particular self-conception. It becomes apparent, that the so called common process paradigm—how the cooperation in urban riverscapes is implemented—plays a crucial role in the way planning processes take place. Last but not least it influences the spatial development and design itself. Relevant parameters for designing and steering integrated planning processes are identified.
Schlagwörter
- Cooperation, Integrated spatial planning, Planning culture, Urban planning, Water management
ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete
- Umweltwissenschaften (insg.)
- Umweltwissenschaften (sonstige)
- Sozialwissenschaften (insg.)
- Geografie, Planung und Entwicklung
- Sozialwissenschaften (insg.)
- Urban studies
Ziele für nachhaltige Entwicklung
Zitieren
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTex
- RIS
in: Raumforschung und Raumordnung, Jahrgang 74, Nr. 1, 28.02.2016, S. 23-38.
Publikation: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift › Artikel › Forschung
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Innerstädtische Flusslandschaften als integriertes Handlungsfeld
AU - Galler, Carolin
AU - Levin-Keitel, Meike
PY - 2016/2/28
Y1 - 2016/2/28
N2 - In urban riverscapes different significant land uses and interests come together, for instance flood protection, environmental protection, tourism or local recreation, nature or monument conservation, waterfront development or climate change mitigation. Accordingly, planning for integrated spatial developments is required for which actors of different administrative units need to collaborate. This paper first shows the institutional requirements for a collaborative approach in riverscapes. Therefore the administrative organization and the legally based objectives and planning instruments are analyzed. Based on planning culture as analytical perspective, further informal and more cultural influence factors of cooperation are included. Following the examples of integrated development planning in the riverscapes of Nuremberg and Ratisbon, some interesting characteristics of two key organizations—water management authorities and city administrations—were pointed out by highlighting their guiding principles, their organization-specific perceptions, and validations as well as their particular self-conception. It becomes apparent, that the so called common process paradigm—how the cooperation in urban riverscapes is implemented—plays a crucial role in the way planning processes take place. Last but not least it influences the spatial development and design itself. Relevant parameters for designing and steering integrated planning processes are identified.
AB - In urban riverscapes different significant land uses and interests come together, for instance flood protection, environmental protection, tourism or local recreation, nature or monument conservation, waterfront development or climate change mitigation. Accordingly, planning for integrated spatial developments is required for which actors of different administrative units need to collaborate. This paper first shows the institutional requirements for a collaborative approach in riverscapes. Therefore the administrative organization and the legally based objectives and planning instruments are analyzed. Based on planning culture as analytical perspective, further informal and more cultural influence factors of cooperation are included. Following the examples of integrated development planning in the riverscapes of Nuremberg and Ratisbon, some interesting characteristics of two key organizations—water management authorities and city administrations—were pointed out by highlighting their guiding principles, their organization-specific perceptions, and validations as well as their particular self-conception. It becomes apparent, that the so called common process paradigm—how the cooperation in urban riverscapes is implemented—plays a crucial role in the way planning processes take place. Last but not least it influences the spatial development and design itself. Relevant parameters for designing and steering integrated planning processes are identified.
KW - Cooperation
KW - Integrated spatial planning
KW - Planning culture
KW - Urban planning
KW - Water management
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85009128206&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s13147-015-0374-3
DO - 10.1007/s13147-015-0374-3
M3 - Artikel
VL - 74
SP - 23
EP - 38
JO - Raumforschung und Raumordnung
JF - Raumforschung und Raumordnung
SN - 0034-0111
IS - 1
ER -