Income vulnerability of rural households in Bangladesh: a comparison between Bayesian and classical methods

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Autoren

  • Md Ershadul Islam
  • Ulrike Grote
  • Md Israt Rayhan

Externe Organisationen

  • University of Dhaka
Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)1179-1187
Seitenumfang9
FachzeitschriftJournal of Statistical Computation and Simulation
Jahrgang83
Ausgabenummer6
Frühes Online-Datum30 Jan. 2012
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 2013

Abstract

The geographical location and the monsoon climate render Bangladesh highly vulnerable to natural hazards, deteriorating the country's socio-economic stability. This study is based on 500 randomly chosen rural households from the Household Income and Expenditure Survey [Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics, Planning Division, Ministry of Planning, Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, Dhaka, 2006]. The objectives are to estimate the income vulnerability of rural households and to check whether the Bayesian approaches (natural conjugate prior and non-informative prior estimates) have any superiority over the classical (feasible generalized least square (FGLS)) method. The poverty level, measured from the data, is 24%; whereas the vulnerability estimates, using FGLS, natural conjugate prior and non-informative prior are 31%, 69% and 82%, respectively. Vulnerability estimates by the Bayesian natural conjugate prior approach is found to have greater efficiency compared with FGLS and non-informative prior approaches.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Ziele für nachhaltige Entwicklung

Zitieren

Income vulnerability of rural households in Bangladesh: a comparison between Bayesian and classical methods. / Islam, Md Ershadul; Grote, Ulrike; Rayhan, Md Israt.
in: Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, Jahrgang 83, Nr. 6, 2013, S. 1179-1187.

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Islam ME, Grote U, Rayhan MI. Income vulnerability of rural households in Bangladesh: a comparison between Bayesian and classical methods. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation. 2013;83(6):1179-1187. Epub 2012 Jan 30. doi: 10.1080/00949655.2012.656310
Islam, Md Ershadul ; Grote, Ulrike ; Rayhan, Md Israt. / Income vulnerability of rural households in Bangladesh : a comparison between Bayesian and classical methods. in: Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation. 2013 ; Jahrgang 83, Nr. 6. S. 1179-1187.
Download
@article{3818ee0c0c89468c98ed900621bc8b82,
title = "Income vulnerability of rural households in Bangladesh: a comparison between Bayesian and classical methods",
abstract = "The geographical location and the monsoon climate render Bangladesh highly vulnerable to natural hazards, deteriorating the country's socio-economic stability. This study is based on 500 randomly chosen rural households from the Household Income and Expenditure Survey [Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics, Planning Division, Ministry of Planning, Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, Dhaka, 2006]. The objectives are to estimate the income vulnerability of rural households and to check whether the Bayesian approaches (natural conjugate prior and non-informative prior estimates) have any superiority over the classical (feasible generalized least square (FGLS)) method. The poverty level, measured from the data, is 24%; whereas the vulnerability estimates, using FGLS, natural conjugate prior and non-informative prior are 31%, 69% and 82%, respectively. Vulnerability estimates by the Bayesian natural conjugate prior approach is found to have greater efficiency compared with FGLS and non-informative prior approaches.",
keywords = "Bangladesh, feasible generalized least square, natural conjugate prior, non-informative prior estimate, vulnerability",
author = "Islam, {Md Ershadul} and Ulrike Grote and Rayhan, {Md Israt}",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1080/00949655.2012.656310",
language = "English",
volume = "83",
pages = "1179--1187",
journal = "Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation",
issn = "0094-9655",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "6",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Income vulnerability of rural households in Bangladesh

T2 - a comparison between Bayesian and classical methods

AU - Islam, Md Ershadul

AU - Grote, Ulrike

AU - Rayhan, Md Israt

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - The geographical location and the monsoon climate render Bangladesh highly vulnerable to natural hazards, deteriorating the country's socio-economic stability. This study is based on 500 randomly chosen rural households from the Household Income and Expenditure Survey [Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics, Planning Division, Ministry of Planning, Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, Dhaka, 2006]. The objectives are to estimate the income vulnerability of rural households and to check whether the Bayesian approaches (natural conjugate prior and non-informative prior estimates) have any superiority over the classical (feasible generalized least square (FGLS)) method. The poverty level, measured from the data, is 24%; whereas the vulnerability estimates, using FGLS, natural conjugate prior and non-informative prior are 31%, 69% and 82%, respectively. Vulnerability estimates by the Bayesian natural conjugate prior approach is found to have greater efficiency compared with FGLS and non-informative prior approaches.

AB - The geographical location and the monsoon climate render Bangladesh highly vulnerable to natural hazards, deteriorating the country's socio-economic stability. This study is based on 500 randomly chosen rural households from the Household Income and Expenditure Survey [Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics, Planning Division, Ministry of Planning, Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, Dhaka, 2006]. The objectives are to estimate the income vulnerability of rural households and to check whether the Bayesian approaches (natural conjugate prior and non-informative prior estimates) have any superiority over the classical (feasible generalized least square (FGLS)) method. The poverty level, measured from the data, is 24%; whereas the vulnerability estimates, using FGLS, natural conjugate prior and non-informative prior are 31%, 69% and 82%, respectively. Vulnerability estimates by the Bayesian natural conjugate prior approach is found to have greater efficiency compared with FGLS and non-informative prior approaches.

KW - Bangladesh

KW - feasible generalized least square

KW - natural conjugate prior

KW - non-informative prior estimate

KW - vulnerability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84878982489&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/00949655.2012.656310

DO - 10.1080/00949655.2012.656310

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84878982489

VL - 83

SP - 1179

EP - 1187

JO - Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation

JF - Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation

SN - 0094-9655

IS - 6

ER -