Improving collaboration between ecosystem service communities and the IPBES science-policy platform

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Autoren

  • C. L. Washbourne
  • N. Dendoncker
  • S. Jacobs
  • A. Mascarenhas
  • F. De Longueville
  • A. P.E. van Oudenhoven
  • M. Schröter
  • L. Willemen
  • S. Campagne
  • S. K. Jones
  • M. Garcia-Llorente
  • I. Iniesta-Arandia
  • F. Baró
  • J. Fisher
  • J. Förster
  • C. Jericó-Daminelo
  • J. Lecina-Diaz
  • S. Lavorel
  • B. Lliso
  • C. Montealgre Talero
  • A. Morán-Ordóñez
  • J. V. Roces-Díaz
  • M. A. Schlaepfer
  • J. Van Dijk

Externe Organisationen

  • University College London (UCL)
  • Université de Namur
  • Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Karlsruhe
  • Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (HU Berlin)
  • Leiden University
  • Helmholtz Zentrum München - Deutsches Forschungszentrum für Gesundheit und Umwelt
  • International Institute for Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation
  • The Alliance of Biodiversity International and the International Center for Tropical Agriculture
  • Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM)
  • Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona (UAB)
  • University of Western Australia
  • Helmholtz-Zentrum für Umweltforschung (UFZ)
  • Center for Ecological Research and Forestry Applications (CREAF)
  • Universite de Savoie
  • Basque Centre for Climate Change
  • Universidade de Sao Paulo
  • InForest Joint Research Unit (CTFC-CREAF)
  • Swansea University
  • Universität Genf
  • Norwegian Institute for Nature Research (NINA)
  • Research Institute Nature and Forest (INBO)
Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)165-174
Seitenumfang10
FachzeitschriftEcosystems and People
Jahrgang16
Ausgabenummer1
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 2020

Abstract

The end of the first working program of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) provided an opportunity to draw lessons from its work. This perspective paper captures insights from ecosystem services (ES) researchers and practitioners, largely drawing from the Europeancontext (referred to herein as ‘ES community’), on this key science–policy interface. We synthesize reflections from a workshop on how (i) IPBES can engage the ES community; (ii) the ES community can engage with IPBES; and (iii) individual scientists can contribute. We note that IPBES constitutes a great advancement towards multidisciplinarity and inclusivity in ES research and practice. Key reflections for IPBES are that funding and visibility at ES research events could be improved, the contribution and selection processes could be more transparent, and communication with experts improved. Key reflections for the ES community include a need to improvepolicy-relevance by integrating more social scientists, researchers from developing countries, early-career scientists and policy-makers. Key reflections directed towards individual scientists include contributing (pro)actively to science–policy inter-face initiatives such as IPBES and increasing transdisciplinary research. These reflections intend to contribute to the awareness of challenges and opportunities for institutions, groups and individuals working on ES.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Zitieren

Improving collaboration between ecosystem service communities and the IPBES science-policy platform. / Washbourne, C. L.; Dendoncker, N.; Jacobs, S. et al.
in: Ecosystems and People, Jahrgang 16, Nr. 1, 2020, S. 165-174.

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Washbourne, CL, Dendoncker, N, Jacobs, S, Mascarenhas, A, De Longueville, F, van Oudenhoven, APE, Schröter, M, Willemen, L, Campagne, S, Jones, SK, Garcia-Llorente, M, Iniesta-Arandia, I, Baró, F, Fisher, J, Förster, J, Jericó-Daminelo, C, Lecina-Diaz, J, Lavorel, S, Lliso, B, Montealgre Talero, C, Morán-Ordóñez, A, Roces-Díaz, JV, Schlaepfer, MA & Van Dijk, J 2020, 'Improving collaboration between ecosystem service communities and the IPBES science-policy platform', Ecosystems and People, Jg. 16, Nr. 1, S. 165-174. https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2020.1766573
Washbourne, C. L., Dendoncker, N., Jacobs, S., Mascarenhas, A., De Longueville, F., van Oudenhoven, A. P. E., Schröter, M., Willemen, L., Campagne, S., Jones, S. K., Garcia-Llorente, M., Iniesta-Arandia, I., Baró, F., Fisher, J., Förster, J., Jericó-Daminelo, C., Lecina-Diaz, J., Lavorel, S., Lliso, B., ... Van Dijk, J. (2020). Improving collaboration between ecosystem service communities and the IPBES science-policy platform. Ecosystems and People, 16(1), 165-174. https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2020.1766573
Washbourne CL, Dendoncker N, Jacobs S, Mascarenhas A, De Longueville F, van Oudenhoven APE et al. Improving collaboration between ecosystem service communities and the IPBES science-policy platform. Ecosystems and People. 2020;16(1):165-174. doi: 10.1080/26395916.2020.1766573
Washbourne, C. L. ; Dendoncker, N. ; Jacobs, S. et al. / Improving collaboration between ecosystem service communities and the IPBES science-policy platform. in: Ecosystems and People. 2020 ; Jahrgang 16, Nr. 1. S. 165-174.
Download
@article{edfb51ce08c64e58b59c91a012f2f3f6,
title = "Improving collaboration between ecosystem service communities and the IPBES science-policy platform",
abstract = "The end of the first working program of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) provided an opportunity to draw lessons from its work. This perspective paper captures insights from ecosystem services (ES) researchers and practitioners, largely drawing from the Europeancontext (referred to herein as {\textquoteleft}ES community{\textquoteright}), on this key science–policy interface. We synthesize reflections from a workshop on how (i) IPBES can engage the ES community; (ii) the ES community can engage with IPBES; and (iii) individual scientists can contribute. We note that IPBES constitutes a great advancement towards multidisciplinarity and inclusivity in ES research and practice. Key reflections for IPBES are that funding and visibility at ES research events could be improved, the contribution and selection processes could be more transparent, and communication with experts improved. Key reflections for the ES community include a need to improvepolicy-relevance by integrating more social scientists, researchers from developing countries, early-career scientists and policy-makers. Key reflections directed towards individual scientists include contributing (pro)actively to science–policy inter-face initiatives such as IPBES and increasing transdisciplinary research. These reflections intend to contribute to the awareness of challenges and opportunities for institutions, groups and individuals working on ES.",
keywords = "community of practice, ecosystem services, ESP, Harini Nagendra, IPBES, science-policy interface",
author = "Washbourne, {C. L.} and N. Dendoncker and S. Jacobs and A. Mascarenhas and {De Longueville}, F. and {van Oudenhoven}, {A. P.E.} and M. Schr{\"o}ter and L. Willemen and S. Campagne and Jones, {S. K.} and M. Garcia-Llorente and I. Iniesta-Arandia and F. Bar{\'o} and J. Fisher and J. F{\"o}rster and C. Jeric{\'o}-Daminelo and J. Lecina-Diaz and S. Lavorel and B. Lliso and {Montealgre Talero}, C. and A. Mor{\'a}n-Ord{\'o}{\~n}ez and Roces-D{\'i}az, {J. V.} and Schlaepfer, {M. A.} and {Van Dijk}, J.",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.1080/26395916.2020.1766573",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "165--174",
number = "1",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Improving collaboration between ecosystem service communities and the IPBES science-policy platform

AU - Washbourne, C. L.

AU - Dendoncker, N.

AU - Jacobs, S.

AU - Mascarenhas, A.

AU - De Longueville, F.

AU - van Oudenhoven, A. P.E.

AU - Schröter, M.

AU - Willemen, L.

AU - Campagne, S.

AU - Jones, S. K.

AU - Garcia-Llorente, M.

AU - Iniesta-Arandia, I.

AU - Baró, F.

AU - Fisher, J.

AU - Förster, J.

AU - Jericó-Daminelo, C.

AU - Lecina-Diaz, J.

AU - Lavorel, S.

AU - Lliso, B.

AU - Montealgre Talero, C.

AU - Morán-Ordóñez, A.

AU - Roces-Díaz, J. V.

AU - Schlaepfer, M. A.

AU - Van Dijk, J.

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - The end of the first working program of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) provided an opportunity to draw lessons from its work. This perspective paper captures insights from ecosystem services (ES) researchers and practitioners, largely drawing from the Europeancontext (referred to herein as ‘ES community’), on this key science–policy interface. We synthesize reflections from a workshop on how (i) IPBES can engage the ES community; (ii) the ES community can engage with IPBES; and (iii) individual scientists can contribute. We note that IPBES constitutes a great advancement towards multidisciplinarity and inclusivity in ES research and practice. Key reflections for IPBES are that funding and visibility at ES research events could be improved, the contribution and selection processes could be more transparent, and communication with experts improved. Key reflections for the ES community include a need to improvepolicy-relevance by integrating more social scientists, researchers from developing countries, early-career scientists and policy-makers. Key reflections directed towards individual scientists include contributing (pro)actively to science–policy inter-face initiatives such as IPBES and increasing transdisciplinary research. These reflections intend to contribute to the awareness of challenges and opportunities for institutions, groups and individuals working on ES.

AB - The end of the first working program of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) provided an opportunity to draw lessons from its work. This perspective paper captures insights from ecosystem services (ES) researchers and practitioners, largely drawing from the Europeancontext (referred to herein as ‘ES community’), on this key science–policy interface. We synthesize reflections from a workshop on how (i) IPBES can engage the ES community; (ii) the ES community can engage with IPBES; and (iii) individual scientists can contribute. We note that IPBES constitutes a great advancement towards multidisciplinarity and inclusivity in ES research and practice. Key reflections for IPBES are that funding and visibility at ES research events could be improved, the contribution and selection processes could be more transparent, and communication with experts improved. Key reflections for the ES community include a need to improvepolicy-relevance by integrating more social scientists, researchers from developing countries, early-career scientists and policy-makers. Key reflections directed towards individual scientists include contributing (pro)actively to science–policy inter-face initiatives such as IPBES and increasing transdisciplinary research. These reflections intend to contribute to the awareness of challenges and opportunities for institutions, groups and individuals working on ES.

KW - community of practice

KW - ecosystem services

KW - ESP

KW - Harini Nagendra

KW - IPBES

KW - science-policy interface

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85085694176&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/26395916.2020.1766573

DO - 10.1080/26395916.2020.1766573

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85085694176

VL - 16

SP - 165

EP - 174

JO - Ecosystems and People

JF - Ecosystems and People

SN - 2639-5908

IS - 1

ER -