Details
| Originalsprache | Englisch |
|---|---|
| Titel des Sammelwerks | Material Forming |
| Untertitel | The 26th International ESAFORM Conference on Material Forming – ESAFORM 2023 |
| Herausgeber/-innen | Lukasz Madej, Mateusz Sitko, Konrad Perzynsk |
| Seiten | 737-746 |
| Seitenumfang | 10 |
| Publikationsstatus | Veröffentlicht - 19 Apr. 2023 |
| Veranstaltung | 26th International ESAFORM Conference on Material Forming, ESAFORM 2023 - Kraków, Polen Dauer: 19 Apr. 2023 → 21 Apr. 2023 |
Publikationsreihe
| Name | Materials Research Proceedings |
|---|---|
| Band | 28 |
| ISSN (Print) | 2474-3941 |
| ISSN (elektronisch) | 2474-395X |
Abstract
A forming limit diagram is the standard method to describe the forming capacity of sheet materials. It predicts failure due to necking by limiting major and minor strains. For failure due to fracture, the fracture forming limit diagram is used, but fracture caused by plastic deformation at a shear-dominated stress state cannot be predicted with a conventional fracture forming limit diagram. Therefore, stress-based failure models are used as an alternative. These models are describing the fracture of sheet materials based on the failure strain and the stress state. Material-specific parameters must be determined, but a standardised procedure for the calibration of stress-based failure models is currently not established. Most test procedures show non-constant stress paths and varying stress states in the crack initiation area, which leads to uncertainties and inaccuracies for modelling. Therefore, a new test methodology was invented at the IFUM: a prior presented butterfly test rig was extended to enable an online rotation to adapt the loading angle while testing. First, butterfly tests with CP800 were performed for three fixed loading conditions. The tests were modelled numerically with boundary conditions corresponding to the tests. Based on the numerical results, the stress state as well as failure strain were identified and the stress state deviations were calculated. Afterwards, the necessary angular displacements to compensate the stress state deviations for the adaptive test rig were iteratively determined with numerical simulations using an automatised Python script. Finally, the butterfly tests were performed experimentally with the determined adaptive loading angles to identify the specimen failure and compared to the simulations for validation.
ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete
- Werkstoffwissenschaften (insg.)
- Allgemeine Materialwissenschaften
Zitieren
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTex
- RIS
Material Forming: The 26th International ESAFORM Conference on Material Forming – ESAFORM 2023. Hrsg. / Lukasz Madej; Mateusz Sitko; Konrad Perzynsk. 2023. S. 737-746 (Materials Research Proceedings; Band 28).
Publikation: Beitrag in Buch/Bericht/Sammelwerk/Konferenzband › Aufsatz in Konferenzband › Forschung › Peer-Review
}
TY - GEN
T1 - Improved failure characterisation of high-strength steel using a butterfly test rig with rotation control
AU - Stockburger, Eugen
AU - Wester, Hendrik
AU - Jegatheeswaran, Vithusaan
AU - Dykiert, Matthäus
AU - Behrens, Bernd Arno
N1 - Funding Information: The authors would like to thank the German Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, DFG) for the financial and organisational support of this project with the number 405334714. Furthermore, the authors would like to thank voestalpine Stahl GmbH for providing the material under investigation.
PY - 2023/4/19
Y1 - 2023/4/19
N2 - A forming limit diagram is the standard method to describe the forming capacity of sheet materials. It predicts failure due to necking by limiting major and minor strains. For failure due to fracture, the fracture forming limit diagram is used, but fracture caused by plastic deformation at a shear-dominated stress state cannot be predicted with a conventional fracture forming limit diagram. Therefore, stress-based failure models are used as an alternative. These models are describing the fracture of sheet materials based on the failure strain and the stress state. Material-specific parameters must be determined, but a standardised procedure for the calibration of stress-based failure models is currently not established. Most test procedures show non-constant stress paths and varying stress states in the crack initiation area, which leads to uncertainties and inaccuracies for modelling. Therefore, a new test methodology was invented at the IFUM: a prior presented butterfly test rig was extended to enable an online rotation to adapt the loading angle while testing. First, butterfly tests with CP800 were performed for three fixed loading conditions. The tests were modelled numerically with boundary conditions corresponding to the tests. Based on the numerical results, the stress state as well as failure strain were identified and the stress state deviations were calculated. Afterwards, the necessary angular displacements to compensate the stress state deviations for the adaptive test rig were iteratively determined with numerical simulations using an automatised Python script. Finally, the butterfly tests were performed experimentally with the determined adaptive loading angles to identify the specimen failure and compared to the simulations for validation.
AB - A forming limit diagram is the standard method to describe the forming capacity of sheet materials. It predicts failure due to necking by limiting major and minor strains. For failure due to fracture, the fracture forming limit diagram is used, but fracture caused by plastic deformation at a shear-dominated stress state cannot be predicted with a conventional fracture forming limit diagram. Therefore, stress-based failure models are used as an alternative. These models are describing the fracture of sheet materials based on the failure strain and the stress state. Material-specific parameters must be determined, but a standardised procedure for the calibration of stress-based failure models is currently not established. Most test procedures show non-constant stress paths and varying stress states in the crack initiation area, which leads to uncertainties and inaccuracies for modelling. Therefore, a new test methodology was invented at the IFUM: a prior presented butterfly test rig was extended to enable an online rotation to adapt the loading angle while testing. First, butterfly tests with CP800 were performed for three fixed loading conditions. The tests were modelled numerically with boundary conditions corresponding to the tests. Based on the numerical results, the stress state as well as failure strain were identified and the stress state deviations were calculated. Afterwards, the necessary angular displacements to compensate the stress state deviations for the adaptive test rig were iteratively determined with numerical simulations using an automatised Python script. Finally, the butterfly tests were performed experimentally with the determined adaptive loading angles to identify the specimen failure and compared to the simulations for validation.
KW - Butterfly Specimen
KW - CP800
KW - Experimental-Numerical Procedure
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85160237549&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.21741/9781644902479-80
DO - 10.21741/9781644902479-80
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85160237549
SN - 9781644902462
T3 - Materials Research Proceedings
SP - 737
EP - 746
BT - Material Forming
A2 - Madej, Lukasz
A2 - Sitko, Mateusz
A2 - Perzynsk, Konrad
T2 - 26th International ESAFORM Conference on Material Forming, ESAFORM 2023
Y2 - 19 April 2023 through 21 April 2023
ER -