Impacts of Drying and Rewetting on the Radiocarbon Signature of Respired CO2 and Implications for Incubating Archived Soils

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Autoren

Externe Organisationen

  • Max-Planck-Institut für Biogeochemie
  • Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
  • University of California at Irvine
Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Aufsatznummere2020JG006119
FachzeitschriftJournal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences
Jahrgang126
Ausgabenummer9
Frühes Online-Datum27 Aug. 2021
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 14 Sept. 2021

Abstract

The radiocarbon signature of respired CO2 (∆14C-CO2) measured in laboratory soil incubations integrates contributions from soil carbon pools with a wide range of ages, making it a powerful model constraint. Incubating archived soils enriched by “bomb-C” from mid-20th century nuclear weapons testing would be even more powerful as it would enable us to trace this pulse over time. However, air-drying and subsequent rewetting of archived soils, as well as storage duration, may alter the relative contribution to respiration from soil carbon pools with different cycling rates. We designed three experiments to assess air-drying and rewetting effects on ∆14C-CO2 with constant storage duration (Experiment 1), without storage (Experiment 2), and with variable storage duration (Experiment 3). We found that air-drying and rewetting led to small but significant (α < 0.05) shifts in ∆14C-CO2 relative to undried controls in all experiments, with grassland soils responding more strongly than forest soils. Storage duration (4–14 y) did not have a substantial effect. Mean differences (95% CIs) for experiments 1, 2, and 3 were: 23.3‰ (±6.6), 19.6‰ (±10.3), and 29.3‰ (±29.1) for grassland soils, versus −11.6‰ (±4.1), 12.7‰ (±8.5), and −24.2‰ (±13.2) for forest soils. Our results indicate that air-drying and rewetting soils mobilizes a slightly older pool of carbon that would otherwise be inaccessible to microbes, an effect that persists throughout the incubation. However, as the bias in ∆14C-CO2 from air-drying and rewetting is small, measuring ∆14C-CO2 in incubations of archived soils appears to be a promising technique for constraining soil carbon models.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Ziele für nachhaltige Entwicklung

Zitieren

Impacts of Drying and Rewetting on the Radiocarbon Signature of Respired CO2 and Implications for Incubating Archived Soils. / Beem-Miller, Jeffrey; Schrumpf, Marion; Hoyt, Alison M. et al.
in: Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, Jahrgang 126, Nr. 9, e2020JG006119, 14.09.2021.

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Beem-Miller J, Schrumpf M, Hoyt AM, Guggenberger G, Trumbore S. Impacts of Drying and Rewetting on the Radiocarbon Signature of Respired CO2 and Implications for Incubating Archived Soils. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences. 2021 Sep 14;126(9):e2020JG006119. Epub 2021 Aug 27. doi: 10.1029/2020JG006119
Download
@article{b6ecc41be73e40c183d792f96cb14077,
title = "Impacts of Drying and Rewetting on the Radiocarbon Signature of Respired CO2 and Implications for Incubating Archived Soils",
abstract = "The radiocarbon signature of respired CO2 (∆14C-CO2) measured in laboratory soil incubations integrates contributions from soil carbon pools with a wide range of ages, making it a powerful model constraint. Incubating archived soils enriched by “bomb-C” from mid-20th century nuclear weapons testing would be even more powerful as it would enable us to trace this pulse over time. However, air-drying and subsequent rewetting of archived soils, as well as storage duration, may alter the relative contribution to respiration from soil carbon pools with different cycling rates. We designed three experiments to assess air-drying and rewetting effects on ∆14C-CO2 with constant storage duration (Experiment 1), without storage (Experiment 2), and with variable storage duration (Experiment 3). We found that air-drying and rewetting led to small but significant (α < 0.05) shifts in ∆14C-CO2 relative to undried controls in all experiments, with grassland soils responding more strongly than forest soils. Storage duration (4–14 y) did not have a substantial effect. Mean differences (95% CIs) for experiments 1, 2, and 3 were: 23.3‰ (±6.6), 19.6‰ (±10.3), and 29.3‰ (±29.1) for grassland soils, versus −11.6‰ (±4.1), 12.7‰ (±8.5), and −24.2‰ (±13.2) for forest soils. Our results indicate that air-drying and rewetting soils mobilizes a slightly older pool of carbon that would otherwise be inaccessible to microbes, an effect that persists throughout the incubation. However, as the bias in ∆14C-CO2 from air-drying and rewetting is small, measuring ∆14C-CO2 in incubations of archived soils appears to be a promising technique for constraining soil carbon models.",
keywords = "climate change, incubation, radiocarbon, soil archives, soil carbon, soil carbon modeling",
author = "Jeffrey Beem-Miller and Marion Schrumpf and Hoyt, {Alison M.} and Georg Guggenberger and Susan Trumbore",
note = "Funding Information: The authors would like to acknowledge the invaluable assistance of M. Rost in the laboratory and the field, and I. Schoening, M. Cisneros‐Dozal, J. Koarashi, F. Hopkins, C. Lawrence, and S. Trumbore for sharing data and details on control‐3 sample incubations. Funding was provided by the European Research Council (Horizon, 2020 Research and Innovation Programme, grant agreement 695101; 14Constraint). Open access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. ",
year = "2021",
month = sep,
day = "14",
doi = "10.1029/2020JG006119",
language = "English",
volume = "126",
journal = "Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences",
issn = "2169-8953",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "9",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impacts of Drying and Rewetting on the Radiocarbon Signature of Respired CO2 and Implications for Incubating Archived Soils

AU - Beem-Miller, Jeffrey

AU - Schrumpf, Marion

AU - Hoyt, Alison M.

AU - Guggenberger, Georg

AU - Trumbore, Susan

N1 - Funding Information: The authors would like to acknowledge the invaluable assistance of M. Rost in the laboratory and the field, and I. Schoening, M. Cisneros‐Dozal, J. Koarashi, F. Hopkins, C. Lawrence, and S. Trumbore for sharing data and details on control‐3 sample incubations. Funding was provided by the European Research Council (Horizon, 2020 Research and Innovation Programme, grant agreement 695101; 14Constraint). Open access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

PY - 2021/9/14

Y1 - 2021/9/14

N2 - The radiocarbon signature of respired CO2 (∆14C-CO2) measured in laboratory soil incubations integrates contributions from soil carbon pools with a wide range of ages, making it a powerful model constraint. Incubating archived soils enriched by “bomb-C” from mid-20th century nuclear weapons testing would be even more powerful as it would enable us to trace this pulse over time. However, air-drying and subsequent rewetting of archived soils, as well as storage duration, may alter the relative contribution to respiration from soil carbon pools with different cycling rates. We designed three experiments to assess air-drying and rewetting effects on ∆14C-CO2 with constant storage duration (Experiment 1), without storage (Experiment 2), and with variable storage duration (Experiment 3). We found that air-drying and rewetting led to small but significant (α < 0.05) shifts in ∆14C-CO2 relative to undried controls in all experiments, with grassland soils responding more strongly than forest soils. Storage duration (4–14 y) did not have a substantial effect. Mean differences (95% CIs) for experiments 1, 2, and 3 were: 23.3‰ (±6.6), 19.6‰ (±10.3), and 29.3‰ (±29.1) for grassland soils, versus −11.6‰ (±4.1), 12.7‰ (±8.5), and −24.2‰ (±13.2) for forest soils. Our results indicate that air-drying and rewetting soils mobilizes a slightly older pool of carbon that would otherwise be inaccessible to microbes, an effect that persists throughout the incubation. However, as the bias in ∆14C-CO2 from air-drying and rewetting is small, measuring ∆14C-CO2 in incubations of archived soils appears to be a promising technique for constraining soil carbon models.

AB - The radiocarbon signature of respired CO2 (∆14C-CO2) measured in laboratory soil incubations integrates contributions from soil carbon pools with a wide range of ages, making it a powerful model constraint. Incubating archived soils enriched by “bomb-C” from mid-20th century nuclear weapons testing would be even more powerful as it would enable us to trace this pulse over time. However, air-drying and subsequent rewetting of archived soils, as well as storage duration, may alter the relative contribution to respiration from soil carbon pools with different cycling rates. We designed three experiments to assess air-drying and rewetting effects on ∆14C-CO2 with constant storage duration (Experiment 1), without storage (Experiment 2), and with variable storage duration (Experiment 3). We found that air-drying and rewetting led to small but significant (α < 0.05) shifts in ∆14C-CO2 relative to undried controls in all experiments, with grassland soils responding more strongly than forest soils. Storage duration (4–14 y) did not have a substantial effect. Mean differences (95% CIs) for experiments 1, 2, and 3 were: 23.3‰ (±6.6), 19.6‰ (±10.3), and 29.3‰ (±29.1) for grassland soils, versus −11.6‰ (±4.1), 12.7‰ (±8.5), and −24.2‰ (±13.2) for forest soils. Our results indicate that air-drying and rewetting soils mobilizes a slightly older pool of carbon that would otherwise be inaccessible to microbes, an effect that persists throughout the incubation. However, as the bias in ∆14C-CO2 from air-drying and rewetting is small, measuring ∆14C-CO2 in incubations of archived soils appears to be a promising technique for constraining soil carbon models.

KW - climate change

KW - incubation

KW - radiocarbon

KW - soil archives

KW - soil carbon

KW - soil carbon modeling

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85115720023&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1029/2020JG006119

DO - 10.1029/2020JG006119

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85115720023

VL - 126

JO - Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences

JF - Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences

SN - 2169-8953

IS - 9

M1 - e2020JG006119

ER -

Von denselben Autoren