Impact of Contacting Geometries When Measuring Fill Factors of Solar Cell Current-Voltage Characteristics

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Autorschaft

  • Christian N. Kruse
  • Martin Wolf
  • Carsten Schinke
  • David Hinken
  • Rolf Brendel
  • Karsten Bothe

Organisationseinheiten

Externe Organisationen

  • Institut für Solarenergieforschung GmbH (ISFH)
Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Aufsatznummer7882654
Seiten (von - bis)747-754
Seitenumfang8
FachzeitschriftIEEE Journal of Photovoltaics
Jahrgang7
Ausgabenummer3
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - Mai 2017

Abstract

We analyze the influence of a variety of different contacting geometries on the fill factor (FF) of solar cell I-V measurements. For this analysis, we compare a wide variety of modeled and measured FFs of Si solar cells. We consistently find large FF differences between individual contacting geometries. These differences amount to up to 3%abs for high busbar resistivities of up to 40 Ω/m. We analyze the contacting geometries for their sensitivity on uncontrolled variations of the contacting resistances. In this analysis, we find that using triplet rather than tandem configurations and using a larger number of test probes reduces the impact of varying contacting resistances to below 0.02%abs. We propose a contacting geometry that we consider to be suitable for calibrated I-V measurements. This contacting scheme is a configuration with a total of five triplets consisting of two current probes and one sense probe. The sense probe is positioned to measure the average busbar potential between the current probes. This is the optimal contacting geometry in terms of a low sensitivity to the busbar resistivity and variations of contacting resistances. In addition, this geometry does not impose unnecessarily large mechanical stress to the cell under measurement.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Zitieren

Impact of Contacting Geometries When Measuring Fill Factors of Solar Cell Current-Voltage Characteristics. / Kruse, Christian N.; Wolf, Martin; Schinke, Carsten et al.
in: IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics, Jahrgang 7, Nr. 3, 7882654, 05.2017, S. 747-754.

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Kruse CN, Wolf M, Schinke C, Hinken D, Brendel R, Bothe K. Impact of Contacting Geometries When Measuring Fill Factors of Solar Cell Current-Voltage Characteristics. IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics. 2017 Mai;7(3):747-754. 7882654. doi: 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2017.2677084
Kruse, Christian N. ; Wolf, Martin ; Schinke, Carsten et al. / Impact of Contacting Geometries When Measuring Fill Factors of Solar Cell Current-Voltage Characteristics. in: IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics. 2017 ; Jahrgang 7, Nr. 3. S. 747-754.
Download
@article{98ee5a209c2d490588b9e05f9038250e,
title = "Impact of Contacting Geometries When Measuring Fill Factors of Solar Cell Current-Voltage Characteristics",
abstract = "We analyze the influence of a variety of different contacting geometries on the fill factor (FF) of solar cell I-V measurements. For this analysis, we compare a wide variety of modeled and measured FFs of Si solar cells. We consistently find large FF differences between individual contacting geometries. These differences amount to up to 3%abs for high busbar resistivities of up to 40 Ω/m. We analyze the contacting geometries for their sensitivity on uncontrolled variations of the contacting resistances. In this analysis, we find that using triplet rather than tandem configurations and using a larger number of test probes reduces the impact of varying contacting resistances to below 0.02%abs. We propose a contacting geometry that we consider to be suitable for calibrated I-V measurements. This contacting scheme is a configuration with a total of five triplets consisting of two current probes and one sense probe. The sense probe is positioned to measure the average busbar potential between the current probes. This is the optimal contacting geometry in terms of a low sensitivity to the busbar resistivity and variations of contacting resistances. In addition, this geometry does not impose unnecessarily large mechanical stress to the cell under measurement.",
keywords = "Characterization of photovoltaics (PV), current-voltage characteristics, IEC standards",
author = "Kruse, {Christian N.} and Martin Wolf and Carsten Schinke and David Hinken and Rolf Brendel and Karsten Bothe",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2017 IEEE. Copyright: Copyright 2017 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.",
year = "2017",
month = may,
doi = "10.1109/JPHOTOV.2017.2677084",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "747--754",
journal = "IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics",
issn = "2156-3381",
publisher = "IEEE Electron Devices Society",
number = "3",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impact of Contacting Geometries When Measuring Fill Factors of Solar Cell Current-Voltage Characteristics

AU - Kruse, Christian N.

AU - Wolf, Martin

AU - Schinke, Carsten

AU - Hinken, David

AU - Brendel, Rolf

AU - Bothe, Karsten

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2017 IEEE. Copyright: Copyright 2017 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

PY - 2017/5

Y1 - 2017/5

N2 - We analyze the influence of a variety of different contacting geometries on the fill factor (FF) of solar cell I-V measurements. For this analysis, we compare a wide variety of modeled and measured FFs of Si solar cells. We consistently find large FF differences between individual contacting geometries. These differences amount to up to 3%abs for high busbar resistivities of up to 40 Ω/m. We analyze the contacting geometries for their sensitivity on uncontrolled variations of the contacting resistances. In this analysis, we find that using triplet rather than tandem configurations and using a larger number of test probes reduces the impact of varying contacting resistances to below 0.02%abs. We propose a contacting geometry that we consider to be suitable for calibrated I-V measurements. This contacting scheme is a configuration with a total of five triplets consisting of two current probes and one sense probe. The sense probe is positioned to measure the average busbar potential between the current probes. This is the optimal contacting geometry in terms of a low sensitivity to the busbar resistivity and variations of contacting resistances. In addition, this geometry does not impose unnecessarily large mechanical stress to the cell under measurement.

AB - We analyze the influence of a variety of different contacting geometries on the fill factor (FF) of solar cell I-V measurements. For this analysis, we compare a wide variety of modeled and measured FFs of Si solar cells. We consistently find large FF differences between individual contacting geometries. These differences amount to up to 3%abs for high busbar resistivities of up to 40 Ω/m. We analyze the contacting geometries for their sensitivity on uncontrolled variations of the contacting resistances. In this analysis, we find that using triplet rather than tandem configurations and using a larger number of test probes reduces the impact of varying contacting resistances to below 0.02%abs. We propose a contacting geometry that we consider to be suitable for calibrated I-V measurements. This contacting scheme is a configuration with a total of five triplets consisting of two current probes and one sense probe. The sense probe is positioned to measure the average busbar potential between the current probes. This is the optimal contacting geometry in terms of a low sensitivity to the busbar resistivity and variations of contacting resistances. In addition, this geometry does not impose unnecessarily large mechanical stress to the cell under measurement.

KW - Characterization of photovoltaics (PV)

KW - current-voltage characteristics

KW - IEC standards

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85016099729&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2017.2677084

DO - 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2017.2677084

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85016099729

VL - 7

SP - 747

EP - 754

JO - IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics

JF - IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics

SN - 2156-3381

IS - 3

M1 - 7882654

ER -