How academic opinion leaders shape scientific ideas: an acknowledgment analysis

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Autoren

  • Malte Doehne
  • Catherine Herfeld

Externe Organisationen

  • Universität Zürich (UZH)
Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)2507-2533
Seitenumfang27
FachzeitschriftSCIENTOMETRICS
Jahrgang128
Ausgabenummer4
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - Apr. 2023
Extern publiziertJa

Abstract

In this paper, we examine how a research institution’s social structure and the presence of academic opinion leaders shaped the early adoption of a scientific innovation. Our case considers the early engagement of mathematical economists at the Cowles Commission with John von Neumann and Oskar Morgenstern’s Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. We argue that scholars with administrative leadership functions who were not only scientifically but also organizationally central—in our case Jacob Marschak, the director of research at Cowles—played a crucial role in promoting the early adoption of the Theory of Games. We support our argument with a scientometric analysis of all acknowledgments made in 488 papers published from 1944 to 1955 in the two main research paper series at the Cowles Commission. We apply blockmodeling techniques to the acknowledgments network to reconstruct the formal and informal social structure at Cowles at the time. Our case study emphasizes the importance of formal and informal social structures and the research agendas of academic opinion leaders to explain the early engagement with and adoption of innovative scientific ideas. Studies of the early adoption of scientific theories can benefit from complementary perspectives on the role of academic opinion leaders and scientists in explaining theory adoption.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Zitieren

How academic opinion leaders shape scientific ideas: an acknowledgment analysis. / Doehne, Malte; Herfeld, Catherine.
in: SCIENTOMETRICS, Jahrgang 128, Nr. 4, 04.2023, S. 2507-2533.

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Doehne M, Herfeld C. How academic opinion leaders shape scientific ideas: an acknowledgment analysis. SCIENTOMETRICS. 2023 Apr;128(4):2507-2533. doi: 10.1007/s11192-022-04623-z
Doehne, Malte ; Herfeld, Catherine. / How academic opinion leaders shape scientific ideas : an acknowledgment analysis. in: SCIENTOMETRICS. 2023 ; Jahrgang 128, Nr. 4. S. 2507-2533.
Download
@article{c3863954f3e344ef80e80acb447c3450,
title = "How academic opinion leaders shape scientific ideas: an acknowledgment analysis",
abstract = "In this paper, we examine how a research institution{\textquoteright}s social structure and the presence of academic opinion leaders shaped the early adoption of a scientific innovation. Our case considers the early engagement of mathematical economists at the Cowles Commission with John von Neumann and Oskar Morgenstern{\textquoteright}s Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. We argue that scholars with administrative leadership functions who were not only scientifically but also organizationally central—in our case Jacob Marschak, the director of research at Cowles—played a crucial role in promoting the early adoption of the Theory of Games. We support our argument with a scientometric analysis of all acknowledgments made in 488 papers published from 1944 to 1955 in the two main research paper series at the Cowles Commission. We apply blockmodeling techniques to the acknowledgments network to reconstruct the formal and informal social structure at Cowles at the time. Our case study emphasizes the importance of formal and informal social structures and the research agendas of academic opinion leaders to explain the early engagement with and adoption of innovative scientific ideas. Studies of the early adoption of scientific theories can benefit from complementary perspectives on the role of academic opinion leaders and scientists in explaining theory adoption.",
keywords = "Academic opinion leaders, Acknowledgments analysis, Blockmodeling, Diffusion of scientific theories, History of economics, History of rational choice theories",
author = "Malte Doehne and Catherine Herfeld",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2023, The Author(s).",
year = "2023",
month = apr,
doi = "10.1007/s11192-022-04623-z",
language = "English",
volume = "128",
pages = "2507--2533",
journal = "SCIENTOMETRICS",
issn = "0138-9130",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "4",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - How academic opinion leaders shape scientific ideas

T2 - an acknowledgment analysis

AU - Doehne, Malte

AU - Herfeld, Catherine

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2023, The Author(s).

PY - 2023/4

Y1 - 2023/4

N2 - In this paper, we examine how a research institution’s social structure and the presence of academic opinion leaders shaped the early adoption of a scientific innovation. Our case considers the early engagement of mathematical economists at the Cowles Commission with John von Neumann and Oskar Morgenstern’s Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. We argue that scholars with administrative leadership functions who were not only scientifically but also organizationally central—in our case Jacob Marschak, the director of research at Cowles—played a crucial role in promoting the early adoption of the Theory of Games. We support our argument with a scientometric analysis of all acknowledgments made in 488 papers published from 1944 to 1955 in the two main research paper series at the Cowles Commission. We apply blockmodeling techniques to the acknowledgments network to reconstruct the formal and informal social structure at Cowles at the time. Our case study emphasizes the importance of formal and informal social structures and the research agendas of academic opinion leaders to explain the early engagement with and adoption of innovative scientific ideas. Studies of the early adoption of scientific theories can benefit from complementary perspectives on the role of academic opinion leaders and scientists in explaining theory adoption.

AB - In this paper, we examine how a research institution’s social structure and the presence of academic opinion leaders shaped the early adoption of a scientific innovation. Our case considers the early engagement of mathematical economists at the Cowles Commission with John von Neumann and Oskar Morgenstern’s Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. We argue that scholars with administrative leadership functions who were not only scientifically but also organizationally central—in our case Jacob Marschak, the director of research at Cowles—played a crucial role in promoting the early adoption of the Theory of Games. We support our argument with a scientometric analysis of all acknowledgments made in 488 papers published from 1944 to 1955 in the two main research paper series at the Cowles Commission. We apply blockmodeling techniques to the acknowledgments network to reconstruct the formal and informal social structure at Cowles at the time. Our case study emphasizes the importance of formal and informal social structures and the research agendas of academic opinion leaders to explain the early engagement with and adoption of innovative scientific ideas. Studies of the early adoption of scientific theories can benefit from complementary perspectives on the role of academic opinion leaders and scientists in explaining theory adoption.

KW - Academic opinion leaders

KW - Acknowledgments analysis

KW - Blockmodeling

KW - Diffusion of scientific theories

KW - History of economics

KW - History of rational choice theories

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85150230130&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11192-022-04623-z

DO - 10.1007/s11192-022-04623-z

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85150230130

VL - 128

SP - 2507

EP - 2533

JO - SCIENTOMETRICS

JF - SCIENTOMETRICS

SN - 0138-9130

IS - 4

ER -