Health as a Purpose or as a Right: The Principle of Proportionality and the Measures Against the Covid-19 Pandemic

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Autoren

  • Gabriel Ducatti Lino Machado
Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)353-373
Seitenumfang21
FachzeitschriftICL JOURNAL-VIENNA JOURNAL ON INTERNATIONAL CONSTITUTIONAL LAW
Jahrgang16
Ausgabenummer3
Frühes Online-Datum22 März 2022
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 27 Sept. 2022

Abstract

The Covid-19 pandemic has given cause for serious restrictions of fundamental liberty rights. In the legal doctrine of fundamental rights, the classical tool for the assessment of the material constitutionality of interferences with fundamental rights is the principle of proportionality. Indeed, the material determinant of the principle of proportionality is the intensity of the intervention in the fundamental right. One preliminary question, however, is often underestimated: the question as to the constitutional status of the interests protected or promoted by the intervening measures. After outlining the structure of the principle of proportionality, this article investigates the constitutional status that the interests protected by Covid-19 measures might have: is the protection of people's health merely a legitimate purpose or a right? Finally, this article shows, with recourse to decisions of the German and Brazilian Constitutional Courts, the implications that different classifications have for the principle of proportionality.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

  • Sozialwissenschaften (insg.)
  • Recht

Zitieren

Health as a Purpose or as a Right: The Principle of Proportionality and the Measures Against the Covid-19 Pandemic. / Machado, Gabriel Ducatti Lino.
in: ICL JOURNAL-VIENNA JOURNAL ON INTERNATIONAL CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, Jahrgang 16, Nr. 3, 27.09.2022, S. 353-373.

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Machado, GDL 2022, 'Health as a Purpose or as a Right: The Principle of Proportionality and the Measures Against the Covid-19 Pandemic', ICL JOURNAL-VIENNA JOURNAL ON INTERNATIONAL CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, Jg. 16, Nr. 3, S. 353-373. https://doi.org/10.1515/icl-2021-0042
Machado, G. D. L. (2022). Health as a Purpose or as a Right: The Principle of Proportionality and the Measures Against the Covid-19 Pandemic. ICL JOURNAL-VIENNA JOURNAL ON INTERNATIONAL CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, 16(3), 353-373. https://doi.org/10.1515/icl-2021-0042
Machado GDL. Health as a Purpose or as a Right: The Principle of Proportionality and the Measures Against the Covid-19 Pandemic. ICL JOURNAL-VIENNA JOURNAL ON INTERNATIONAL CONSTITUTIONAL LAW. 2022 Sep 27;16(3):353-373. Epub 2022 Mär 22. doi: 10.1515/icl-2021-0042
Machado, Gabriel Ducatti Lino. / Health as a Purpose or as a Right : The Principle of Proportionality and the Measures Against the Covid-19 Pandemic. in: ICL JOURNAL-VIENNA JOURNAL ON INTERNATIONAL CONSTITUTIONAL LAW. 2022 ; Jahrgang 16, Nr. 3. S. 353-373.
Download
@article{b04b21cf83c449e9a542896f36ce949f,
title = "Health as a Purpose or as a Right: The Principle of Proportionality and the Measures Against the Covid-19 Pandemic",
abstract = "The Covid-19 pandemic has given cause for serious restrictions of fundamental liberty rights. In the legal doctrine of fundamental rights, the classical tool for the assessment of the material constitutionality of interferences with fundamental rights is the principle of proportionality. Indeed, the material determinant of the principle of proportionality is the intensity of the intervention in the fundamental right. One preliminary question, however, is often underestimated: the question as to the constitutional status of the interests protected or promoted by the intervening measures. After outlining the structure of the principle of proportionality, this article investigates the constitutional status that the interests protected by Covid-19 measures might have: is the protection of people's health merely a legitimate purpose or a right? Finally, this article shows, with recourse to decisions of the German and Brazilian Constitutional Courts, the implications that different classifications have for the principle of proportionality.",
keywords = "Covid-19, principle of proportionality, fundamental right to health, Germany, Brazil, constitutional reasoning",
author = "Machado, {Gabriel Ducatti Lino}",
year = "2022",
month = sep,
day = "27",
doi = "10.1515/icl-2021-0042",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "353--373",
number = "3",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Health as a Purpose or as a Right

T2 - The Principle of Proportionality and the Measures Against the Covid-19 Pandemic

AU - Machado, Gabriel Ducatti Lino

PY - 2022/9/27

Y1 - 2022/9/27

N2 - The Covid-19 pandemic has given cause for serious restrictions of fundamental liberty rights. In the legal doctrine of fundamental rights, the classical tool for the assessment of the material constitutionality of interferences with fundamental rights is the principle of proportionality. Indeed, the material determinant of the principle of proportionality is the intensity of the intervention in the fundamental right. One preliminary question, however, is often underestimated: the question as to the constitutional status of the interests protected or promoted by the intervening measures. After outlining the structure of the principle of proportionality, this article investigates the constitutional status that the interests protected by Covid-19 measures might have: is the protection of people's health merely a legitimate purpose or a right? Finally, this article shows, with recourse to decisions of the German and Brazilian Constitutional Courts, the implications that different classifications have for the principle of proportionality.

AB - The Covid-19 pandemic has given cause for serious restrictions of fundamental liberty rights. In the legal doctrine of fundamental rights, the classical tool for the assessment of the material constitutionality of interferences with fundamental rights is the principle of proportionality. Indeed, the material determinant of the principle of proportionality is the intensity of the intervention in the fundamental right. One preliminary question, however, is often underestimated: the question as to the constitutional status of the interests protected or promoted by the intervening measures. After outlining the structure of the principle of proportionality, this article investigates the constitutional status that the interests protected by Covid-19 measures might have: is the protection of people's health merely a legitimate purpose or a right? Finally, this article shows, with recourse to decisions of the German and Brazilian Constitutional Courts, the implications that different classifications have for the principle of proportionality.

KW - Covid-19

KW - principle of proportionality

KW - fundamental right to health

KW - Germany

KW - Brazil

KW - constitutional reasoning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85168594401&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1515/icl-2021-0042

DO - 10.1515/icl-2021-0042

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 353

EP - 373

JO - ICL JOURNAL-VIENNA JOURNAL ON INTERNATIONAL CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

JF - ICL JOURNAL-VIENNA JOURNAL ON INTERNATIONAL CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

SN - 2306-3734

IS - 3

ER -