he Effect of Germany’s Federalism on Student Success. The “Index of Commitment” as Comparative Measure for Study and Examination Regulations

Publikation: Arbeitspapier/PreprintArbeitspapier/Diskussionspapier

Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten1–22
Seitenumfang22
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 2024

Abstract

Long-term studies and drop-outs are a major issue in higher education research, but explanatory factors have often been focusing on attitudinal and sociological characteristics using student surveys as methodology. Institutional rules regarding study and learning regulations have often been neglected, although recent research has shown that they incentivize student behaviour. We develop and Index of Commitment (IOC) to cover these rules over different types of study phases and different types of commitments of different actors. We distinguish between an early study phase, a main phase and a late study phase and commitments regarding consultation and examination rules by the state, a higher education institution (HEI) and students. This paper shows empirically that there is a considerable variance of these rules between the 16 German states, which are responsible for the legislation and financing of most of the higher education institutions in Germany. We find states with very soft regulation, where legislation sets almost no rules and student autonomy is held in high regard and states with very precise rules setting strong incentives and leaving only little room for implementation to the HEI. We can show that our index correlates with the percentage of students successfully finishing their degree in time in a state. By presenting our index, we provide a comprehensive understanding of the commitment of study and examination regulations. The findings and insights can contribute to the ongoing discourse on student autonomy and state control in higher education, as well as inform policy makers and educational institutions in developing effective strategies to address dropout and long-term study. It also shows again that “bringing the state back in” in higher education research is important.

Zitieren

he Effect of Germany’s Federalism on Student Success. The “Index of Commitment” as Comparative Measure for Study and Examination Regulations. / Hönnige, Christoph; Bauer, Victoria A.; Bernauer, J et al.
2024. S. 1–22.

Publikation: Arbeitspapier/PreprintArbeitspapier/Diskussionspapier

Hönnige, C, Bauer, VA, Bernauer, J, Zittlau, S, Epping, V, Widdig, VV, Jungbauer-Gans, M, Oberschelp, A, Isleib, S & Nguyen Xuan, A 2024 'he Effect of Germany’s Federalism on Student Success. The “Index of Commitment” as Comparative Measure for Study and Examination Regulations' S. 1–22. https://doi.org/10.15488/16457
Hönnige, C., Bauer, V. A., Bernauer, J., Zittlau, S., Epping, V., Widdig, V. V., Jungbauer-Gans, M., Oberschelp, A., Isleib, S., & Nguyen Xuan, A. (2024). he Effect of Germany’s Federalism on Student Success. The “Index of Commitment” as Comparative Measure for Study and Examination Regulations. (S. 1–22). https://doi.org/10.15488/16457
Download
@techreport{e7cdd365a3bc45cf95e5899aa6d9e216,
title = "he Effect of Germany{\textquoteright}s Federalism on Student Success.: The “Index of Commitment” as Comparative Measure for Study and Examination Regulations",
abstract = "Long-term studies and drop-outs are a major issue in higher education research, but explanatory factors have often been focusing on attitudinal and sociological characteristics using student surveys as methodology. Institutional rules regarding study and learning regulations have often been neglected, although recent research has shown that they incentivize student behaviour. We develop and Index of Commitment (IOC) to cover these rules over different types of study phases and different types of commitments of different actors. We distinguish between an early study phase, a main phase and a late study phase and commitments regarding consultation and examination rules by the state, a higher education institution (HEI) and students. This paper shows empirically that there is a considerable variance of these rules between the 16 German states, which are responsible for the legislation and financing of most of the higher education institutions in Germany. We find states with very soft regulation, where legislation sets almost no rules and student autonomy is held in high regard and states with very precise rules setting strong incentives and leaving only little room for implementation to the HEI. We can show that our index correlates with the percentage of students successfully finishing their degree in time in a state. By presenting our index, we provide a comprehensive understanding of the commitment of study and examination regulations. The findings and insights can contribute to the ongoing discourse on student autonomy and state control in higher education, as well as inform policy makers and educational institutions in developing effective strategies to address dropout and long-term study. It also shows again that “bringing the state back in” in higher education research is important.",
author = "Christoph H{\"o}nnige and Bauer, {Victoria A.} and J Bernauer and S Zittlau and Volker Epping and Widdig, {Vincent Viktor} and Monika Jungbauer-Gans and A Oberschelp and S Isleib and {Nguyen Xuan}, A",
year = "2024",
doi = "10.15488/16457",
language = "English",
pages = "1–22",
type = "WorkingPaper",

}

Download

TY - UNPB

T1 - he Effect of Germany’s Federalism on Student Success.

T2 - The “Index of Commitment” as Comparative Measure for Study and Examination Regulations

AU - Hönnige, Christoph

AU - Bauer, Victoria A.

AU - Bernauer, J

AU - Zittlau, S

AU - Epping, Volker

AU - Widdig, Vincent Viktor

AU - Jungbauer-Gans, Monika

AU - Oberschelp, A

AU - Isleib, S

AU - Nguyen Xuan, A

PY - 2024

Y1 - 2024

N2 - Long-term studies and drop-outs are a major issue in higher education research, but explanatory factors have often been focusing on attitudinal and sociological characteristics using student surveys as methodology. Institutional rules regarding study and learning regulations have often been neglected, although recent research has shown that they incentivize student behaviour. We develop and Index of Commitment (IOC) to cover these rules over different types of study phases and different types of commitments of different actors. We distinguish between an early study phase, a main phase and a late study phase and commitments regarding consultation and examination rules by the state, a higher education institution (HEI) and students. This paper shows empirically that there is a considerable variance of these rules between the 16 German states, which are responsible for the legislation and financing of most of the higher education institutions in Germany. We find states with very soft regulation, where legislation sets almost no rules and student autonomy is held in high regard and states with very precise rules setting strong incentives and leaving only little room for implementation to the HEI. We can show that our index correlates with the percentage of students successfully finishing their degree in time in a state. By presenting our index, we provide a comprehensive understanding of the commitment of study and examination regulations. The findings and insights can contribute to the ongoing discourse on student autonomy and state control in higher education, as well as inform policy makers and educational institutions in developing effective strategies to address dropout and long-term study. It also shows again that “bringing the state back in” in higher education research is important.

AB - Long-term studies and drop-outs are a major issue in higher education research, but explanatory factors have often been focusing on attitudinal and sociological characteristics using student surveys as methodology. Institutional rules regarding study and learning regulations have often been neglected, although recent research has shown that they incentivize student behaviour. We develop and Index of Commitment (IOC) to cover these rules over different types of study phases and different types of commitments of different actors. We distinguish between an early study phase, a main phase and a late study phase and commitments regarding consultation and examination rules by the state, a higher education institution (HEI) and students. This paper shows empirically that there is a considerable variance of these rules between the 16 German states, which are responsible for the legislation and financing of most of the higher education institutions in Germany. We find states with very soft regulation, where legislation sets almost no rules and student autonomy is held in high regard and states with very precise rules setting strong incentives and leaving only little room for implementation to the HEI. We can show that our index correlates with the percentage of students successfully finishing their degree in time in a state. By presenting our index, we provide a comprehensive understanding of the commitment of study and examination regulations. The findings and insights can contribute to the ongoing discourse on student autonomy and state control in higher education, as well as inform policy makers and educational institutions in developing effective strategies to address dropout and long-term study. It also shows again that “bringing the state back in” in higher education research is important.

U2 - 10.15488/16457

DO - 10.15488/16457

M3 - Working paper/Discussion paper

SP - 1

EP - 22

BT - he Effect of Germany’s Federalism on Student Success.

ER -

Von denselben Autoren