Hate Speech and Bad Language: The Ugly Face of Social Influencers and Its Impact on Brands

Publikation: Beitrag in Buch/Bericht/Sammelwerk/KonferenzbandAbstract in KonferenzbandForschungPeer-Review

Autoren

  • Walter von Mettenheim
  • Klaus Peter Wiedmann
Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Titel des SammelwerksOptimistic Marketing in Challenging Times
UntertitelServing Ever-Shifting Customer Needs, Proceedings of the 2022 AMS Annual Conference
ErscheinungsortCham
Herausgeber (Verlag)Springer Nature
Seiten291-292
Seitenumfang2
ISBN (elektronisch)978-3-031-24687-6
ISBN (Print)978-3-031-24686-9
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 14 März 2023
Veranstaltung2022 AMS Annual Conference - Monterey, USA / Vereinigte Staaten
Dauer: 25 Mai 202227 Mai 2022

Publikationsreihe

NameDevelopments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science
ISSN (Print)2363-6165
ISSN (elektronisch)2363-6173

Abstract

In light of the growing trend of influencer marketing, ample research has been conducted on its success factors (Lin et al., 2018). However, one success factor has rarely been considered: Influencers’ moral integrity, i.e., the absence of scandals. This is all the more surprising because the absence of scandals has been identified as the first and most important requirement for the success of any celebrity – above other much more frequently discussed requirements such as attractiveness, expertise or trustworthiness (Amos et al., 2015). As influencers’ main field of activity is the Internet, a major scandal may become a worldwide event in a matter of hours (Piazza & Jourdan, 2018). In addition, a scandal caused by an influencer is likely to become dangerous for an endorsed brand, which will be considered “guilty by association” (Appel et al., 2020; Kintu & Ben-Slimane, 2020). In the course of this work, we focus on five Hate Speech & Bad Language Scandals. These are: (1) Common use of Swearwords, (2) Gossiping, (3) Insulting followers, (4) Extremism and (5) Racist Slurs. Thereby we analyze the (a) perceived immorality and effects on (b) trust in the influencer, (c) liking of the influencer, (d) following the influencer and (e) purchase intention of the endorsed brand. We pose the following questions: Which scandals have the worst impacts on the influencer and brand? Are there some (minor) scandals that are not hazardous or may even be positive? To answer these questions, we examine and rank the effects of scandals on the influencer and endorsed brands through a survey employing 429 data sets analyzed by variance and cluster analyses in SPSS. In this way, we hierarchize influencer scandals. Some of the results are surprising. For example, even relatively small transgressions, such as the use of swearwords, can have detrimental effects on both the influencer and the brand – nevertheless it is the most minor scandal. Gossiping and insulting followers is of medium seriousness. The most serious scandals are extremism and racist slurs. Overall, a racist slur appears to be the most serious scandal, followed by extremism (except for the variable immorality, where insulting followers is the second worst). Finally, it should be noted that the impacts of the scandals on the five dependent variables were all similar, with differences in details only. At best, the small differences between immorality and the four other dependent variables are noteworthy. For example, immorality is the only variable for which gossiping does not differ significantly from extremism.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Ziele für nachhaltige Entwicklung

Zitieren

Hate Speech and Bad Language: The Ugly Face of Social Influencers and Its Impact on Brands. / von Mettenheim, Walter; Wiedmann, Klaus Peter.
Optimistic Marketing in Challenging Times: Serving Ever-Shifting Customer Needs, Proceedings of the 2022 AMS Annual Conference. Cham: Springer Nature, 2023. S. 291-292 (Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science).

Publikation: Beitrag in Buch/Bericht/Sammelwerk/KonferenzbandAbstract in KonferenzbandForschungPeer-Review

von Mettenheim, W & Wiedmann, KP 2023, Hate Speech and Bad Language: The Ugly Face of Social Influencers and Its Impact on Brands. in Optimistic Marketing in Challenging Times: Serving Ever-Shifting Customer Needs, Proceedings of the 2022 AMS Annual Conference. Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer Nature, Cham, S. 291-292, 2022 AMS Annual Conference, Monterey, USA / Vereinigte Staaten, 25 Mai 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24687-6_116
von Mettenheim, W., & Wiedmann, K. P. (2023). Hate Speech and Bad Language: The Ugly Face of Social Influencers and Its Impact on Brands. In Optimistic Marketing in Challenging Times: Serving Ever-Shifting Customer Needs, Proceedings of the 2022 AMS Annual Conference (S. 291-292). (Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24687-6_116
von Mettenheim W, Wiedmann KP. Hate Speech and Bad Language: The Ugly Face of Social Influencers and Its Impact on Brands. in Optimistic Marketing in Challenging Times: Serving Ever-Shifting Customer Needs, Proceedings of the 2022 AMS Annual Conference. Cham: Springer Nature. 2023. S. 291-292. (Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science). doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-24687-6_116
von Mettenheim, Walter ; Wiedmann, Klaus Peter. / Hate Speech and Bad Language : The Ugly Face of Social Influencers and Its Impact on Brands. Optimistic Marketing in Challenging Times: Serving Ever-Shifting Customer Needs, Proceedings of the 2022 AMS Annual Conference. Cham : Springer Nature, 2023. S. 291-292 (Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science).
Download
@inbook{c612fec712694f75b6e60afc59f6dffd,
title = "Hate Speech and Bad Language: The Ugly Face of Social Influencers and Its Impact on Brands",
abstract = "In light of the growing trend of influencer marketing, ample research has been conducted on its success factors (Lin et al., 2018). However, one success factor has rarely been considered: Influencers{\textquoteright} moral integrity, i.e., the absence of scandals. This is all the more surprising because the absence of scandals has been identified as the first and most important requirement for the success of any celebrity – above other much more frequently discussed requirements such as attractiveness, expertise or trustworthiness (Amos et al., 2015). As influencers{\textquoteright} main field of activity is the Internet, a major scandal may become a worldwide event in a matter of hours (Piazza & Jourdan, 2018). In addition, a scandal caused by an influencer is likely to become dangerous for an endorsed brand, which will be considered “guilty by association” (Appel et al., 2020; Kintu & Ben-Slimane, 2020). In the course of this work, we focus on five Hate Speech & Bad Language Scandals. These are: (1) Common use of Swearwords, (2) Gossiping, (3) Insulting followers, (4) Extremism and (5) Racist Slurs. Thereby we analyze the (a) perceived immorality and effects on (b) trust in the influencer, (c) liking of the influencer, (d) following the influencer and (e) purchase intention of the endorsed brand. We pose the following questions: Which scandals have the worst impacts on the influencer and brand? Are there some (minor) scandals that are not hazardous or may even be positive? To answer these questions, we examine and rank the effects of scandals on the influencer and endorsed brands through a survey employing 429 data sets analyzed by variance and cluster analyses in SPSS. In this way, we hierarchize influencer scandals. Some of the results are surprising. For example, even relatively small transgressions, such as the use of swearwords, can have detrimental effects on both the influencer and the brand – nevertheless it is the most minor scandal. Gossiping and insulting followers is of medium seriousness. The most serious scandals are extremism and racist slurs. Overall, a racist slur appears to be the most serious scandal, followed by extremism (except for the variable immorality, where insulting followers is the second worst). Finally, it should be noted that the impacts of the scandals on the five dependent variables were all similar, with differences in details only. At best, the small differences between immorality and the four other dependent variables are noteworthy. For example, immorality is the only variable for which gossiping does not differ significantly from extremism.",
keywords = "Hate speech, Language, Scandal, Social influencer marketing",
author = "{von Mettenheim}, Walter and Wiedmann, {Klaus Peter}",
year = "2023",
month = mar,
day = "14",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-031-24687-6_116",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-3-031-24686-9",
series = "Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science",
publisher = "Springer Nature",
pages = "291--292",
booktitle = "Optimistic Marketing in Challenging Times",
address = "United States",
note = "2022 AMS Annual Conference ; Conference date: 25-05-2022 Through 27-05-2022",

}

Download

TY - CHAP

T1 - Hate Speech and Bad Language

T2 - 2022 AMS Annual Conference

AU - von Mettenheim, Walter

AU - Wiedmann, Klaus Peter

PY - 2023/3/14

Y1 - 2023/3/14

N2 - In light of the growing trend of influencer marketing, ample research has been conducted on its success factors (Lin et al., 2018). However, one success factor has rarely been considered: Influencers’ moral integrity, i.e., the absence of scandals. This is all the more surprising because the absence of scandals has been identified as the first and most important requirement for the success of any celebrity – above other much more frequently discussed requirements such as attractiveness, expertise or trustworthiness (Amos et al., 2015). As influencers’ main field of activity is the Internet, a major scandal may become a worldwide event in a matter of hours (Piazza & Jourdan, 2018). In addition, a scandal caused by an influencer is likely to become dangerous for an endorsed brand, which will be considered “guilty by association” (Appel et al., 2020; Kintu & Ben-Slimane, 2020). In the course of this work, we focus on five Hate Speech & Bad Language Scandals. These are: (1) Common use of Swearwords, (2) Gossiping, (3) Insulting followers, (4) Extremism and (5) Racist Slurs. Thereby we analyze the (a) perceived immorality and effects on (b) trust in the influencer, (c) liking of the influencer, (d) following the influencer and (e) purchase intention of the endorsed brand. We pose the following questions: Which scandals have the worst impacts on the influencer and brand? Are there some (minor) scandals that are not hazardous or may even be positive? To answer these questions, we examine and rank the effects of scandals on the influencer and endorsed brands through a survey employing 429 data sets analyzed by variance and cluster analyses in SPSS. In this way, we hierarchize influencer scandals. Some of the results are surprising. For example, even relatively small transgressions, such as the use of swearwords, can have detrimental effects on both the influencer and the brand – nevertheless it is the most minor scandal. Gossiping and insulting followers is of medium seriousness. The most serious scandals are extremism and racist slurs. Overall, a racist slur appears to be the most serious scandal, followed by extremism (except for the variable immorality, where insulting followers is the second worst). Finally, it should be noted that the impacts of the scandals on the five dependent variables were all similar, with differences in details only. At best, the small differences between immorality and the four other dependent variables are noteworthy. For example, immorality is the only variable for which gossiping does not differ significantly from extremism.

AB - In light of the growing trend of influencer marketing, ample research has been conducted on its success factors (Lin et al., 2018). However, one success factor has rarely been considered: Influencers’ moral integrity, i.e., the absence of scandals. This is all the more surprising because the absence of scandals has been identified as the first and most important requirement for the success of any celebrity – above other much more frequently discussed requirements such as attractiveness, expertise or trustworthiness (Amos et al., 2015). As influencers’ main field of activity is the Internet, a major scandal may become a worldwide event in a matter of hours (Piazza & Jourdan, 2018). In addition, a scandal caused by an influencer is likely to become dangerous for an endorsed brand, which will be considered “guilty by association” (Appel et al., 2020; Kintu & Ben-Slimane, 2020). In the course of this work, we focus on five Hate Speech & Bad Language Scandals. These are: (1) Common use of Swearwords, (2) Gossiping, (3) Insulting followers, (4) Extremism and (5) Racist Slurs. Thereby we analyze the (a) perceived immorality and effects on (b) trust in the influencer, (c) liking of the influencer, (d) following the influencer and (e) purchase intention of the endorsed brand. We pose the following questions: Which scandals have the worst impacts on the influencer and brand? Are there some (minor) scandals that are not hazardous or may even be positive? To answer these questions, we examine and rank the effects of scandals on the influencer and endorsed brands through a survey employing 429 data sets analyzed by variance and cluster analyses in SPSS. In this way, we hierarchize influencer scandals. Some of the results are surprising. For example, even relatively small transgressions, such as the use of swearwords, can have detrimental effects on both the influencer and the brand – nevertheless it is the most minor scandal. Gossiping and insulting followers is of medium seriousness. The most serious scandals are extremism and racist slurs. Overall, a racist slur appears to be the most serious scandal, followed by extremism (except for the variable immorality, where insulting followers is the second worst). Finally, it should be noted that the impacts of the scandals on the five dependent variables were all similar, with differences in details only. At best, the small differences between immorality and the four other dependent variables are noteworthy. For example, immorality is the only variable for which gossiping does not differ significantly from extremism.

KW - Hate speech

KW - Language

KW - Scandal

KW - Social influencer marketing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85151257823&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-031-24687-6_116

DO - 10.1007/978-3-031-24687-6_116

M3 - Conference abstract

AN - SCOPUS:85151257823

SN - 978-3-031-24686-9

T3 - Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science

SP - 291

EP - 292

BT - Optimistic Marketing in Challenging Times

PB - Springer Nature

CY - Cham

Y2 - 25 May 2022 through 27 May 2022

ER -