Growth of epitaxially stabilized, non-cubic Gd2O3 on silicon(1 1 1) substrates

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Autoren

  • M. Moellers
  • C. Margenfeld
  • T. F. Wietler
  • H. J. Osten
Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)141-144
Seitenumfang4
FachzeitschriftJournal of Crystal Growth
Jahrgang480
Frühes Online-Datum19 Okt. 2017
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 15 Dez. 2017

Abstract

We report on the growth of non-cubic gadolinium oxide on a silicon substrate using molecular beam epitaxy. Structural investigations with X-ray diffraction show that the structure of the oxide differs from the expected cubic structure. Possible structures of gadolinium oxide besides the only stable cubic structure include a monoclinic and a hexagonal phase. Both phases are very similar, which increases the difficulty to distinguish between the two structures. Gracing incidence X-ray diffraction results of the grown layer indicate a monoclinic structure while in contradiction to that a phi-scan shows a sixfold symmetry. We explain these results by a monoclinic structure with six rotational domains.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Zitieren

Growth of epitaxially stabilized, non-cubic Gd2O3 on silicon(1 1 1) substrates. / Moellers, M.; Margenfeld, C.; Wietler, T. F. et al.
in: Journal of Crystal Growth, Jahrgang 480, 15.12.2017, S. 141-144.

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Moellers M, Margenfeld C, Wietler TF, Osten HJ. Growth of epitaxially stabilized, non-cubic Gd2O3 on silicon(1 1 1) substrates. Journal of Crystal Growth. 2017 Dez 15;480:141-144. Epub 2017 Okt 19. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2017.10.019
Moellers, M. ; Margenfeld, C. ; Wietler, T. F. et al. / Growth of epitaxially stabilized, non-cubic Gd2O3 on silicon(1 1 1) substrates. in: Journal of Crystal Growth. 2017 ; Jahrgang 480. S. 141-144.
Download
@article{889b7ca8b0c04fa89b02c5d3cdd9f8ef,
title = "Growth of epitaxially stabilized, non-cubic Gd2O3 on silicon(1 1 1) substrates",
abstract = "We report on the growth of non-cubic gadolinium oxide on a silicon substrate using molecular beam epitaxy. Structural investigations with X-ray diffraction show that the structure of the oxide differs from the expected cubic structure. Possible structures of gadolinium oxide besides the only stable cubic structure include a monoclinic and a hexagonal phase. Both phases are very similar, which increases the difficulty to distinguish between the two structures. Gracing incidence X-ray diffraction results of the grown layer indicate a monoclinic structure while in contradiction to that a phi-scan shows a sixfold symmetry. We explain these results by a monoclinic structure with six rotational domains.",
keywords = "A1: Phase changes, structure, characterization, A3: Molecular beam epitaxy, B1: Oxides, gadolinium compounds",
author = "M. Moellers and C. Margenfeld and Wietler, {T. F.} and Osten, {H. J.}",
note = "Funding information: One of the authors (M.M.) would like to thank the Minna-James-Heineman foundation for a scholarship. We also would like to thank E. Bugiel, M. Budde, and J. Schmidt for fruitful discussions.",
year = "2017",
month = dec,
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2017.10.019",
language = "English",
volume = "480",
pages = "141--144",
journal = "Journal of Crystal Growth",
issn = "0022-0248",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Growth of epitaxially stabilized, non-cubic Gd2O3 on silicon(1 1 1) substrates

AU - Moellers, M.

AU - Margenfeld, C.

AU - Wietler, T. F.

AU - Osten, H. J.

N1 - Funding information: One of the authors (M.M.) would like to thank the Minna-James-Heineman foundation for a scholarship. We also would like to thank E. Bugiel, M. Budde, and J. Schmidt for fruitful discussions.

PY - 2017/12/15

Y1 - 2017/12/15

N2 - We report on the growth of non-cubic gadolinium oxide on a silicon substrate using molecular beam epitaxy. Structural investigations with X-ray diffraction show that the structure of the oxide differs from the expected cubic structure. Possible structures of gadolinium oxide besides the only stable cubic structure include a monoclinic and a hexagonal phase. Both phases are very similar, which increases the difficulty to distinguish between the two structures. Gracing incidence X-ray diffraction results of the grown layer indicate a monoclinic structure while in contradiction to that a phi-scan shows a sixfold symmetry. We explain these results by a monoclinic structure with six rotational domains.

AB - We report on the growth of non-cubic gadolinium oxide on a silicon substrate using molecular beam epitaxy. Structural investigations with X-ray diffraction show that the structure of the oxide differs from the expected cubic structure. Possible structures of gadolinium oxide besides the only stable cubic structure include a monoclinic and a hexagonal phase. Both phases are very similar, which increases the difficulty to distinguish between the two structures. Gracing incidence X-ray diffraction results of the grown layer indicate a monoclinic structure while in contradiction to that a phi-scan shows a sixfold symmetry. We explain these results by a monoclinic structure with six rotational domains.

KW - A1: Phase changes, structure, characterization

KW - A3: Molecular beam epitaxy

KW - B1: Oxides, gadolinium compounds

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85032203645&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2017.10.019

DO - 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2017.10.019

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85032203645

VL - 480

SP - 141

EP - 144

JO - Journal of Crystal Growth

JF - Journal of Crystal Growth

SN - 0022-0248

ER -