Good Practice Data Linkage

Publikation: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift › Artikel › Forschung › Peer-Review

Autoren

  • Stefanie March
  • Silke Andrich
  • Johannes Drepper
  • Dirk Horenkamp-Sonntag
  • Andrea Icks
  • Peter Ihle
  • Joachim Kieschke
  • Bianca Kollhorst
  • Birga Maier
  • Ingo Meyer
  • Gabriele Müller
  • Christoph Ohlmeier
  • Dirk Peschke
  • Adrian Richter
  • Marie Luise Rosenbusch
  • Nadine Scholten
  • Mandy Schulz
  • Christoph Stallmann
  • Enno Swart
  • Stefanie Wobbe-Ribinski
  • Antke Wolter
  • Jan Zeidler
  • Falk Hoffmann

Organisationseinheiten

Externe Organisationen

  • Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg
  • Techniker Krankenkasse (TK)
  • Universität zu Köln
  • Berlin-Brandenburger Herzinfarktregister e.V.
  • Technische Universität Dresden
  • IGES Institut GmbH
  • Universität Bremen
  • Hochschule für Gesundheit Bochum
  • Universität Greifswald
  • Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg
  • Technologie- und Methodenplattform für die vernetzte medizinische Forschung e.V. (TMF)
  • Epidemiologisches Krebsregister Niedersachsen (EKN)
  • Leibniz-Institut für Präventionsforschung und Epidemiologie - BIPS GmbH
  • Zentralinstitut für die kassenärztliche Versorgung in Deutschland (Zi)
  • DAK-Gesundheit Zentrale
  • Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf
  • Deutsches Diabetes-Zentrum (DDZ)
Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

Titel in ÜbersetzungGute Praxis Datenlinkage (GPD)
OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)636-650
Seitenumfang15
FachzeitschriftGESUNDHEITSWESEN
Jahrgang81
Ausgabenummer8-9
PublikationsstatusElektronisch veröffentlicht (E-Pub) - 8 Aug. 2019

Abstract

Individual data linkage of different data sources for research purposes is being increasingly used in Germany in recent years. However, generally accepted methodological guidance is missing. The aim of this article is to define such methodological standards for research projects. Another aim is to provide readers with a checklist for critical appraisal of research proposals and articles. Since 2016, an expert panel of members of different German scientific societies have worked together and developed 7 guidelines with a total of 27 practical recommendations. These recommendations include (1) research aims, questions, data sources and resources, (2) infrastructure and data flow, (3) data privacy, (4) ethics, (5) key variables and type of linkage, (6) data validation/quality assurance and (7) long-term use for future research questions. The authors provide a rationale for each recommendation. Future revisions will include any new developments in science and data privacy.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Ziele für nachhaltige Entwicklung

Zitieren

Good Practice Data Linkage. / March, Stefanie; Andrich, Silke; Drepper, Johannes et al.
in: GESUNDHEITSWESEN, Jahrgang 81, Nr. 8-9, 08.08.2019, S. 636-650.

Publikation: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift › Artikel › Forschung › Peer-Review

March, S, Andrich, S, Drepper, J, Horenkamp-Sonntag, D, Icks, A, Ihle, P, Kieschke, J, Kollhorst, B, Maier, B, Meyer, I, Müller, G, Ohlmeier, C, Peschke, D, Richter, A, Rosenbusch, ML, Scholten, N, Schulz, M, Stallmann, C, Swart, E, Wobbe-Ribinski, S, Wolter, A, Zeidler, J & Hoffmann, F 2019, 'Good Practice Data Linkage', GESUNDHEITSWESEN, Jg. 81, Nr. 8-9, S. 636-650. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0962-9933
March, S., Andrich, S., Drepper, J., Horenkamp-Sonntag, D., Icks, A., Ihle, P., Kieschke, J., Kollhorst, B., Maier, B., Meyer, I., Müller, G., Ohlmeier, C., Peschke, D., Richter, A., Rosenbusch, M. L., Scholten, N., Schulz, M., Stallmann, C., Swart, E., ... Hoffmann, F. (2019). Good Practice Data Linkage. GESUNDHEITSWESEN, 81(8-9), 636-650. Vorabveröffentlichung online. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0962-9933
March S, Andrich S, Drepper J, Horenkamp-Sonntag D, Icks A, Ihle P et al. Good Practice Data Linkage. GESUNDHEITSWESEN. 2019 Aug 8;81(8-9):636-650. Epub 2019 Aug 8. doi: 10.1055/a-0962-9933
March, Stefanie ; Andrich, Silke ; Drepper, Johannes et al. / Good Practice Data Linkage. in: GESUNDHEITSWESEN. 2019 ; Jahrgang 81, Nr. 8-9. S. 636-650.
Download
@article{ba16954a6710415db74c630cf0f2207a,
title = "Good Practice Data Linkage",
abstract = "Individual data linkage of different data sources for research purposes is being increasingly used in Germany in recent years. However, generally accepted methodological guidance is missing. The aim of this article is to define such methodological standards for research projects. Another aim is to provide readers with a checklist for critical appraisal of research proposals and articles. Since 2016, an expert panel of members of different German scientific societies have worked together and developed 7 guidelines with a total of 27 practical recommendations. These recommendations include (1) research aims, questions, data sources and resources, (2) infrastructure and data flow, (3) data privacy, (4) ethics, (5) key variables and type of linkage, (6) data validation/quality assurance and (7) long-term use for future research questions. The authors provide a rationale for each recommendation. Future revisions will include any new developments in science and data privacy.",
keywords = "epidemiology, guidelines, health services research, personal data, record linkage, standard",
author = "Stefanie March and Silke Andrich and Johannes Drepper and Dirk Horenkamp-Sonntag and Andrea Icks and Peter Ihle and Joachim Kieschke and Bianca Kollhorst and Birga Maier and Ingo Meyer and Gabriele M{\"u}ller and Christoph Ohlmeier and Dirk Peschke and Adrian Richter and Rosenbusch, {Marie Luise} and Nadine Scholten and Mandy Schulz and Christoph Stallmann and Enno Swart and Stefanie Wobbe-Ribinski and Antke Wolter and Jan Zeidler and Falk Hoffmann",
year = "2019",
month = aug,
day = "8",
doi = "10.1055/a-0962-9933",
language = "English",
volume = "81",
pages = "636--650",
journal = "GESUNDHEITSWESEN",
issn = "0941-3790",
publisher = "Georg Thieme Verlag",
number = "8-9",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Good Practice Data Linkage

AU - March, Stefanie

AU - Andrich, Silke

AU - Drepper, Johannes

AU - Horenkamp-Sonntag, Dirk

AU - Icks, Andrea

AU - Ihle, Peter

AU - Kieschke, Joachim

AU - Kollhorst, Bianca

AU - Maier, Birga

AU - Meyer, Ingo

AU - Müller, Gabriele

AU - Ohlmeier, Christoph

AU - Peschke, Dirk

AU - Richter, Adrian

AU - Rosenbusch, Marie Luise

AU - Scholten, Nadine

AU - Schulz, Mandy

AU - Stallmann, Christoph

AU - Swart, Enno

AU - Wobbe-Ribinski, Stefanie

AU - Wolter, Antke

AU - Zeidler, Jan

AU - Hoffmann, Falk

PY - 2019/8/8

Y1 - 2019/8/8

N2 - Individual data linkage of different data sources for research purposes is being increasingly used in Germany in recent years. However, generally accepted methodological guidance is missing. The aim of this article is to define such methodological standards for research projects. Another aim is to provide readers with a checklist for critical appraisal of research proposals and articles. Since 2016, an expert panel of members of different German scientific societies have worked together and developed 7 guidelines with a total of 27 practical recommendations. These recommendations include (1) research aims, questions, data sources and resources, (2) infrastructure and data flow, (3) data privacy, (4) ethics, (5) key variables and type of linkage, (6) data validation/quality assurance and (7) long-term use for future research questions. The authors provide a rationale for each recommendation. Future revisions will include any new developments in science and data privacy.

AB - Individual data linkage of different data sources for research purposes is being increasingly used in Germany in recent years. However, generally accepted methodological guidance is missing. The aim of this article is to define such methodological standards for research projects. Another aim is to provide readers with a checklist for critical appraisal of research proposals and articles. Since 2016, an expert panel of members of different German scientific societies have worked together and developed 7 guidelines with a total of 27 practical recommendations. These recommendations include (1) research aims, questions, data sources and resources, (2) infrastructure and data flow, (3) data privacy, (4) ethics, (5) key variables and type of linkage, (6) data validation/quality assurance and (7) long-term use for future research questions. The authors provide a rationale for each recommendation. Future revisions will include any new developments in science and data privacy.

KW - epidemiology

KW - guidelines

KW - health services research

KW - personal data

KW - record linkage

KW - standard

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071309443&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1055/a-0962-9933

DO - 10.1055/a-0962-9933

M3 - Article

C2 - 31394579

AN - SCOPUS:85071309443

VL - 81

SP - 636

EP - 650

JO - GESUNDHEITSWESEN

JF - GESUNDHEITSWESEN

SN - 0941-3790

IS - 8-9

ER -