Genome sequencing: a systematic review of health economic evidence

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftÜbersichtsarbeitForschungPeer-Review

Autoren

  • Martin Frank
  • Anne Prenzler
  • Roland Eils
  • J. Matthias Graf von der Schulenburg

Externe Organisationen

  • Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ)
Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Aufsatznummer29
Seiten (von - bis)1-8
Seitenumfang8
FachzeitschriftHealth Economics Review
Jahrgang3
Ausgabenummer1
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 12 Dez. 2013

Abstract

Recently the sequencing of the human genome has become a major biological and clinical research field. However, the public health impact of this new technology with focus on the financial effect is not yet to be foreseen. To provide an overview of the current health economic evidence for genome sequencing, we conducted a thorough systematic review of the literature from 17 databases. In addition, we conducted a hand search. Starting with 5 520 records we ultimately included five full-text publications and one internet source, all focused on cost calculations. The results were very heterogeneous and, therefore, difficult to compare. Furthermore, because the methodology of the publications was quite poor, the reliability and validity of the results were questionable. The real costs for the whole sequencing workflow, including data management and analysis, remain unknown. Overall, our review indicates that the current health economic evidence for genome sequencing is quite poor. Therefore, we listed aspects that needed to be considered when conducting health economic analyses of genome sequencing. Thereby, specifics regarding the overall aim, technology, population, indication, comparator, alternatives after sequencing, outcomes, probabilities, and costs with respect to genome sequencing are discussed. For further research, at the outset, a comprehensive cost calculation of genome sequencing is needed, because all further health economic studies rely on valid cost data. The results will serve as an input parameter for budget-impact analyses or cost-effectiveness analyses.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Ziele für nachhaltige Entwicklung

Zitieren

Genome sequencing: a systematic review of health economic evidence. / Frank, Martin; Prenzler, Anne; Eils, Roland et al.
in: Health Economics Review, Jahrgang 3, Nr. 1, 29, 12.12.2013, S. 1-8.

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftÜbersichtsarbeitForschungPeer-Review

Frank, M, Prenzler, A, Eils, R & von der Schulenburg, JMG 2013, 'Genome sequencing: a systematic review of health economic evidence', Health Economics Review, Jg. 3, Nr. 1, 29, S. 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/2191-1991-3-29
Frank, M., Prenzler, A., Eils, R., & von der Schulenburg, J. M. G. (2013). Genome sequencing: a systematic review of health economic evidence. Health Economics Review, 3(1), 1-8. Artikel 29. https://doi.org/10.1186/2191-1991-3-29
Frank M, Prenzler A, Eils R, von der Schulenburg JMG. Genome sequencing: a systematic review of health economic evidence. Health Economics Review. 2013 Dez 12;3(1):1-8. 29. doi: 10.1186/2191-1991-3-29
Frank, Martin ; Prenzler, Anne ; Eils, Roland et al. / Genome sequencing : a systematic review of health economic evidence. in: Health Economics Review. 2013 ; Jahrgang 3, Nr. 1. S. 1-8.
Download
@article{5f2387862edb4aefaf3bbbe3bddce7a3,
title = "Genome sequencing: a systematic review of health economic evidence",
abstract = "Recently the sequencing of the human genome has become a major biological and clinical research field. However, the public health impact of this new technology with focus on the financial effect is not yet to be foreseen. To provide an overview of the current health economic evidence for genome sequencing, we conducted a thorough systematic review of the literature from 17 databases. In addition, we conducted a hand search. Starting with 5 520 records we ultimately included five full-text publications and one internet source, all focused on cost calculations. The results were very heterogeneous and, therefore, difficult to compare. Furthermore, because the methodology of the publications was quite poor, the reliability and validity of the results were questionable. The real costs for the whole sequencing workflow, including data management and analysis, remain unknown. Overall, our review indicates that the current health economic evidence for genome sequencing is quite poor. Therefore, we listed aspects that needed to be considered when conducting health economic analyses of genome sequencing. Thereby, specifics regarding the overall aim, technology, population, indication, comparator, alternatives after sequencing, outcomes, probabilities, and costs with respect to genome sequencing are discussed. For further research, at the outset, a comprehensive cost calculation of genome sequencing is needed, because all further health economic studies rely on valid cost data. The results will serve as an input parameter for budget-impact analyses or cost-effectiveness analyses.",
keywords = "Cost analysis, Genome, Health economics, Sequencing",
author = "Martin Frank and Anne Prenzler and Roland Eils and {von der Schulenburg}, {J. Matthias Graf}",
note = "Funding Information: We would like to thank the Marsilius Kolleg for their unconditional financial support of the EURAT group. We acknowledge support by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft and Open Access Publishing Fund of Leibniz Universit{\"a}t Hannover.",
year = "2013",
month = dec,
day = "12",
doi = "10.1186/2191-1991-3-29",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "1--8",
number = "1",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Genome sequencing

T2 - a systematic review of health economic evidence

AU - Frank, Martin

AU - Prenzler, Anne

AU - Eils, Roland

AU - von der Schulenburg, J. Matthias Graf

N1 - Funding Information: We would like to thank the Marsilius Kolleg for their unconditional financial support of the EURAT group. We acknowledge support by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft and Open Access Publishing Fund of Leibniz Universität Hannover.

PY - 2013/12/12

Y1 - 2013/12/12

N2 - Recently the sequencing of the human genome has become a major biological and clinical research field. However, the public health impact of this new technology with focus on the financial effect is not yet to be foreseen. To provide an overview of the current health economic evidence for genome sequencing, we conducted a thorough systematic review of the literature from 17 databases. In addition, we conducted a hand search. Starting with 5 520 records we ultimately included five full-text publications and one internet source, all focused on cost calculations. The results were very heterogeneous and, therefore, difficult to compare. Furthermore, because the methodology of the publications was quite poor, the reliability and validity of the results were questionable. The real costs for the whole sequencing workflow, including data management and analysis, remain unknown. Overall, our review indicates that the current health economic evidence for genome sequencing is quite poor. Therefore, we listed aspects that needed to be considered when conducting health economic analyses of genome sequencing. Thereby, specifics regarding the overall aim, technology, population, indication, comparator, alternatives after sequencing, outcomes, probabilities, and costs with respect to genome sequencing are discussed. For further research, at the outset, a comprehensive cost calculation of genome sequencing is needed, because all further health economic studies rely on valid cost data. The results will serve as an input parameter for budget-impact analyses or cost-effectiveness analyses.

AB - Recently the sequencing of the human genome has become a major biological and clinical research field. However, the public health impact of this new technology with focus on the financial effect is not yet to be foreseen. To provide an overview of the current health economic evidence for genome sequencing, we conducted a thorough systematic review of the literature from 17 databases. In addition, we conducted a hand search. Starting with 5 520 records we ultimately included five full-text publications and one internet source, all focused on cost calculations. The results were very heterogeneous and, therefore, difficult to compare. Furthermore, because the methodology of the publications was quite poor, the reliability and validity of the results were questionable. The real costs for the whole sequencing workflow, including data management and analysis, remain unknown. Overall, our review indicates that the current health economic evidence for genome sequencing is quite poor. Therefore, we listed aspects that needed to be considered when conducting health economic analyses of genome sequencing. Thereby, specifics regarding the overall aim, technology, population, indication, comparator, alternatives after sequencing, outcomes, probabilities, and costs with respect to genome sequencing are discussed. For further research, at the outset, a comprehensive cost calculation of genome sequencing is needed, because all further health economic studies rely on valid cost data. The results will serve as an input parameter for budget-impact analyses or cost-effectiveness analyses.

KW - Cost analysis

KW - Genome

KW - Health economics

KW - Sequencing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84971218643&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/2191-1991-3-29

DO - 10.1186/2191-1991-3-29

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:84971218643

VL - 3

SP - 1

EP - 8

JO - Health Economics Review

JF - Health Economics Review

SN - 2191-1991

IS - 1

M1 - 29

ER -