From Educational Decisions to Labour Market Consequences: Understanding the Interrelation between Sex Segregation and Gender Specific Educational and Employment Trajectories

Publikation: Qualifikations-/StudienabschlussarbeitDissertation

Autoren

  • Anna Erika Hägglund

Organisationseinheiten

Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
QualifikationDoctor philosophiae
Gradverleihende Hochschule
Betreut von
  • Kathrin Leuze, Betreuer*in
Datum der Verleihung des Grades8 Feb. 2019
ErscheinungsortHannover
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 2021

Abstract

Despite tremendous advances in women’s educational attainment and employment over time, women still enrol into different fields of study than men and earn less once they enter the labour market. These aspects are interrelated, as fields of study preferred by women are associated with lower wages. This thesis aims to disentangle the process, in which gender differences in field of study choices emerge and transform into gender inequality in the labour market through four steps: occupational expectations in adolescence, field of study choices in higher education, early labour market careers, and subsequent employment trajectories. Empirically, each step is addressed by means of a quantitative analysis, with data sets, key predictors, and modelling strategies accommodating the specific research question at hand. The results confirm previous research and offer new insights on specific explanations. First, gender differences in task-related preferences, i.e., occupational interests, are important for explaining horizontal sex segregation. Occupational interests are strongly related to subject-specific specialization and performance in the secondary educational system, suggesting that young men and women develop gender-specific skill- and interest profiles throughout their educational trajectories. These profiles seem to align with cultural notions of tasks and skills particularly suitable for each gender. The results also show that the labour market and the occupational structure are important institutions embodying such norms of masculinity and femininity. Thus, certain environments seem to strengthen gender differences in occupational preferences. Mechanisms driving educational choices, such as interests, seem to differ from those that foster gender inequality in the labour market. In specific, the extent to which educational and occupational decisions transform into labour market inequality is contingent on the institutional setting. While the results confirm that the sex composition of fields of study and occupation structures gender inequality, it does not evoke disadvantage across all contexts. Finally, horizontal sex segregation does not affect labour market trajectories of men and women similarly. Thus, theoretical explanations need to be adapted to accommodate gender-specific patterns, which, in turn, might be context-dependent. The horizontal sex segregation is resilient to change if the occupational structure supports a realization of ‘gender-typical’ occupational interests. Meanwhile, gender differences in occupational interests are not necessarily detrimental for employment trajectories, if the labour market enables highly-qualified women to pursue these paths in well-remunerated occupations.

Ziele für nachhaltige Entwicklung

Zitieren

From Educational Decisions to Labour Market Consequences: Understanding the Interrelation between Sex Segregation and Gender Specific Educational and Employment Trajectories. / Hägglund, Anna Erika.
Hannover, 2021. 126 S.

Publikation: Qualifikations-/StudienabschlussarbeitDissertation

Download
@phdthesis{2ada3d90a2e34e0a963a9ee120ec3584,
title = "From Educational Decisions to Labour Market Consequences: Understanding the Interrelation between Sex Segregation and Gender Specific Educational and Employment Trajectories",
abstract = "Despite tremendous advances in women{\textquoteright}s educational attainment and employment over time, women still enrol into different fields of study than men and earn less once they enter the labour market. These aspects are interrelated, as fields of study preferred by women are associated with lower wages. This thesis aims to disentangle the process, in which gender differences in field of study choices emerge and transform into gender inequality in the labour market through four steps: occupational expectations in adolescence, field of study choices in higher education, early labour market careers, and subsequent employment trajectories. Empirically, each step is addressed by means of a quantitative analysis, with data sets, key predictors, and modelling strategies accommodating the specific research question at hand. The results confirm previous research and offer new insights on specific explanations. First, gender differences in task-related preferences, i.e., occupational interests, are important for explaining horizontal sex segregation. Occupational interests are strongly related to subject-specific specialization and performance in the secondary educational system, suggesting that young men and women develop gender-specific skill- and interest profiles throughout their educational trajectories. These profiles seem to align with cultural notions of tasks and skills particularly suitable for each gender. The results also show that the labour market and the occupational structure are important institutions embodying such norms of masculinity and femininity. Thus, certain environments seem to strengthen gender differences in occupational preferences. Mechanisms driving educational choices, such as interests, seem to differ from those that foster gender inequality in the labour market. In specific, the extent to which educational and occupational decisions transform into labour market inequality is contingent on the institutional setting. While the results confirm that the sex composition of fields of study and occupation structures gender inequality, it does not evoke disadvantage across all contexts. Finally, horizontal sex segregation does not affect labour market trajectories of men and women similarly. Thus, theoretical explanations need to be adapted to accommodate gender-specific patterns, which, in turn, might be context-dependent. The horizontal sex segregation is resilient to change if the occupational structure supports a realization of {\textquoteleft}gender-typical{\textquoteright} occupational interests. Meanwhile, gender differences in occupational interests are not necessarily detrimental for employment trajectories, if the labour market enables highly-qualified women to pursue these paths in well-remunerated occupations.",
keywords = "Arbeitsmarktungleichheit, L{\"a}ngsschnittanalyse, field of study choices, labour market inequality, gender, sex segregation, occupations, longitudinal methods, Beruf, Horizontale Segregation, Geschlecht, Studienfachwahl, Erwerbsverl{\"a}ufe",
author = "H{\"a}gglund, {Anna Erika}",
note = "Doctoral thesis",
year = "2021",
doi = "10.15488/10374",
language = "English",
school = "Leibniz University Hannover",

}

Download

TY - BOOK

T1 - From Educational Decisions to Labour Market Consequences

T2 - Understanding the Interrelation between Sex Segregation and Gender Specific Educational and Employment Trajectories

AU - Hägglund, Anna Erika

N1 - Doctoral thesis

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - Despite tremendous advances in women’s educational attainment and employment over time, women still enrol into different fields of study than men and earn less once they enter the labour market. These aspects are interrelated, as fields of study preferred by women are associated with lower wages. This thesis aims to disentangle the process, in which gender differences in field of study choices emerge and transform into gender inequality in the labour market through four steps: occupational expectations in adolescence, field of study choices in higher education, early labour market careers, and subsequent employment trajectories. Empirically, each step is addressed by means of a quantitative analysis, with data sets, key predictors, and modelling strategies accommodating the specific research question at hand. The results confirm previous research and offer new insights on specific explanations. First, gender differences in task-related preferences, i.e., occupational interests, are important for explaining horizontal sex segregation. Occupational interests are strongly related to subject-specific specialization and performance in the secondary educational system, suggesting that young men and women develop gender-specific skill- and interest profiles throughout their educational trajectories. These profiles seem to align with cultural notions of tasks and skills particularly suitable for each gender. The results also show that the labour market and the occupational structure are important institutions embodying such norms of masculinity and femininity. Thus, certain environments seem to strengthen gender differences in occupational preferences. Mechanisms driving educational choices, such as interests, seem to differ from those that foster gender inequality in the labour market. In specific, the extent to which educational and occupational decisions transform into labour market inequality is contingent on the institutional setting. While the results confirm that the sex composition of fields of study and occupation structures gender inequality, it does not evoke disadvantage across all contexts. Finally, horizontal sex segregation does not affect labour market trajectories of men and women similarly. Thus, theoretical explanations need to be adapted to accommodate gender-specific patterns, which, in turn, might be context-dependent. The horizontal sex segregation is resilient to change if the occupational structure supports a realization of ‘gender-typical’ occupational interests. Meanwhile, gender differences in occupational interests are not necessarily detrimental for employment trajectories, if the labour market enables highly-qualified women to pursue these paths in well-remunerated occupations.

AB - Despite tremendous advances in women’s educational attainment and employment over time, women still enrol into different fields of study than men and earn less once they enter the labour market. These aspects are interrelated, as fields of study preferred by women are associated with lower wages. This thesis aims to disentangle the process, in which gender differences in field of study choices emerge and transform into gender inequality in the labour market through four steps: occupational expectations in adolescence, field of study choices in higher education, early labour market careers, and subsequent employment trajectories. Empirically, each step is addressed by means of a quantitative analysis, with data sets, key predictors, and modelling strategies accommodating the specific research question at hand. The results confirm previous research and offer new insights on specific explanations. First, gender differences in task-related preferences, i.e., occupational interests, are important for explaining horizontal sex segregation. Occupational interests are strongly related to subject-specific specialization and performance in the secondary educational system, suggesting that young men and women develop gender-specific skill- and interest profiles throughout their educational trajectories. These profiles seem to align with cultural notions of tasks and skills particularly suitable for each gender. The results also show that the labour market and the occupational structure are important institutions embodying such norms of masculinity and femininity. Thus, certain environments seem to strengthen gender differences in occupational preferences. Mechanisms driving educational choices, such as interests, seem to differ from those that foster gender inequality in the labour market. In specific, the extent to which educational and occupational decisions transform into labour market inequality is contingent on the institutional setting. While the results confirm that the sex composition of fields of study and occupation structures gender inequality, it does not evoke disadvantage across all contexts. Finally, horizontal sex segregation does not affect labour market trajectories of men and women similarly. Thus, theoretical explanations need to be adapted to accommodate gender-specific patterns, which, in turn, might be context-dependent. The horizontal sex segregation is resilient to change if the occupational structure supports a realization of ‘gender-typical’ occupational interests. Meanwhile, gender differences in occupational interests are not necessarily detrimental for employment trajectories, if the labour market enables highly-qualified women to pursue these paths in well-remunerated occupations.

KW - Arbeitsmarktungleichheit

KW - Längsschnittanalyse

KW - field of study choices

KW - labour market inequality

KW - gender

KW - sex segregation

KW - occupations

KW - longitudinal methods

KW - Beruf

KW - Horizontale Segregation

KW - Geschlecht

KW - Studienfachwahl

KW - Erwerbsverläufe

U2 - 10.15488/10374

DO - 10.15488/10374

M3 - Doctoral thesis

CY - Hannover

ER -