Forward Variance Planning and Modeling of multi-variant Products

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftKonferenzaufsatz in FachzeitschriftForschungPeer-Review

Autoren

  • Paul Christoph Gembarski
  • Roland Lachmayer
Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)81-86
Seitenumfang6
FachzeitschriftProcedia CIRP
Jahrgang21
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 17 Nov. 2014
Veranstaltung24th CIRP Design Conference 2014: Mass Customization and Personalization - Milano, Italien
Dauer: 14 Apr. 201416 Apr. 2014

Abstract

Planning multi-variant products in the early stage of the design process is still a challenge. In the present paper, a specification technique is introduced in order to define multi-variant products using degrees of freedom of shape attributes (in the following shape-DoFs) within the product structure. Our goal is to plan variety actively at the beginning of product development and not to describe variety by change of parameter values of the product's components as introduced in variant trees. Shape-DoFs are classified in the fields of shape attributes (dimension, position, shape as well as their combinations) on the one hand and mandatory or optional components on the other hand. Set up on this taxonomy graphical symbols are introduced to be used in product modeling. As application example, a welded pipe rack based upon the assembly structure modeling the product structure in this way is visualized in the first step. The second step is to translate the shape-DoFs into design parameters and identify relationships between them. The result is a parameter plan, as well as a configuration concept. Both can be seen as basis for CAD-modeling the product as design template which is the third step. In case of our example, Autodesk Inventor (without the ETO-Environment) is used to create the CAD-data. Discussing the effects of the proposed method, it will be shown that different shape-DoFs may cause various impacts in the whole product development process. Regarding these effects, scenarios can be performed in order to identify the cost and resource optimal variation possibilities of the product. In addition, it will be shown that different kinds of modularity according to PINE (e.g. cut-to-fit-modularity) can be predefined in the product model by using shape-DoFs.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Zitieren

Forward Variance Planning and Modeling of multi-variant Products. / Gembarski, Paul Christoph; Lachmayer, Roland.
in: Procedia CIRP, Jahrgang 21, 17.11.2014, S. 81-86.

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftKonferenzaufsatz in FachzeitschriftForschungPeer-Review

Gembarski, PC & Lachmayer, R 2014, 'Forward Variance Planning and Modeling of multi-variant Products', Procedia CIRP, Jg. 21, S. 81-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.03.161
Gembarski PC, Lachmayer R. Forward Variance Planning and Modeling of multi-variant Products. Procedia CIRP. 2014 Nov 17;21:81-86. doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2014.03.161
Gembarski, Paul Christoph ; Lachmayer, Roland. / Forward Variance Planning and Modeling of multi-variant Products. in: Procedia CIRP. 2014 ; Jahrgang 21. S. 81-86.
Download
@article{c21327d80685439cbb223de6804f41cd,
title = "Forward Variance Planning and Modeling of multi-variant Products",
abstract = "Planning multi-variant products in the early stage of the design process is still a challenge. In the present paper, a specification technique is introduced in order to define multi-variant products using degrees of freedom of shape attributes (in the following shape-DoFs) within the product structure. Our goal is to plan variety actively at the beginning of product development and not to describe variety by change of parameter values of the product's components as introduced in variant trees. Shape-DoFs are classified in the fields of shape attributes (dimension, position, shape as well as their combinations) on the one hand and mandatory or optional components on the other hand. Set up on this taxonomy graphical symbols are introduced to be used in product modeling. As application example, a welded pipe rack based upon the assembly structure modeling the product structure in this way is visualized in the first step. The second step is to translate the shape-DoFs into design parameters and identify relationships between them. The result is a parameter plan, as well as a configuration concept. Both can be seen as basis for CAD-modeling the product as design template which is the third step. In case of our example, Autodesk Inventor (without the ETO-Environment) is used to create the CAD-data. Discussing the effects of the proposed method, it will be shown that different shape-DoFs may cause various impacts in the whole product development process. Regarding these effects, scenarios can be performed in order to identify the cost and resource optimal variation possibilities of the product. In addition, it will be shown that different kinds of modularity according to PINE (e.g. cut-to-fit-modularity) can be predefined in the product model by using shape-DoFs.",
keywords = "Complexity management, Product configuration, Product customization, Product structure, Shape-DoFs, Specification technique",
author = "Gembarski, {Paul Christoph} and Roland Lachmayer",
year = "2014",
month = nov,
day = "17",
doi = "10.1016/j.procir.2014.03.161",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "81--86",
note = "24th CIRP Design Conference 2014: Mass Customization and Personalization ; Conference date: 14-04-2014 Through 16-04-2014",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Forward Variance Planning and Modeling of multi-variant Products

AU - Gembarski, Paul Christoph

AU - Lachmayer, Roland

PY - 2014/11/17

Y1 - 2014/11/17

N2 - Planning multi-variant products in the early stage of the design process is still a challenge. In the present paper, a specification technique is introduced in order to define multi-variant products using degrees of freedom of shape attributes (in the following shape-DoFs) within the product structure. Our goal is to plan variety actively at the beginning of product development and not to describe variety by change of parameter values of the product's components as introduced in variant trees. Shape-DoFs are classified in the fields of shape attributes (dimension, position, shape as well as their combinations) on the one hand and mandatory or optional components on the other hand. Set up on this taxonomy graphical symbols are introduced to be used in product modeling. As application example, a welded pipe rack based upon the assembly structure modeling the product structure in this way is visualized in the first step. The second step is to translate the shape-DoFs into design parameters and identify relationships between them. The result is a parameter plan, as well as a configuration concept. Both can be seen as basis for CAD-modeling the product as design template which is the third step. In case of our example, Autodesk Inventor (without the ETO-Environment) is used to create the CAD-data. Discussing the effects of the proposed method, it will be shown that different shape-DoFs may cause various impacts in the whole product development process. Regarding these effects, scenarios can be performed in order to identify the cost and resource optimal variation possibilities of the product. In addition, it will be shown that different kinds of modularity according to PINE (e.g. cut-to-fit-modularity) can be predefined in the product model by using shape-DoFs.

AB - Planning multi-variant products in the early stage of the design process is still a challenge. In the present paper, a specification technique is introduced in order to define multi-variant products using degrees of freedom of shape attributes (in the following shape-DoFs) within the product structure. Our goal is to plan variety actively at the beginning of product development and not to describe variety by change of parameter values of the product's components as introduced in variant trees. Shape-DoFs are classified in the fields of shape attributes (dimension, position, shape as well as their combinations) on the one hand and mandatory or optional components on the other hand. Set up on this taxonomy graphical symbols are introduced to be used in product modeling. As application example, a welded pipe rack based upon the assembly structure modeling the product structure in this way is visualized in the first step. The second step is to translate the shape-DoFs into design parameters and identify relationships between them. The result is a parameter plan, as well as a configuration concept. Both can be seen as basis for CAD-modeling the product as design template which is the third step. In case of our example, Autodesk Inventor (without the ETO-Environment) is used to create the CAD-data. Discussing the effects of the proposed method, it will be shown that different shape-DoFs may cause various impacts in the whole product development process. Regarding these effects, scenarios can be performed in order to identify the cost and resource optimal variation possibilities of the product. In addition, it will be shown that different kinds of modularity according to PINE (e.g. cut-to-fit-modularity) can be predefined in the product model by using shape-DoFs.

KW - Complexity management

KW - Product configuration

KW - Product customization

KW - Product structure

KW - Shape-DoFs

KW - Specification technique

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84915774658&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.procir.2014.03.161

DO - 10.1016/j.procir.2014.03.161

M3 - Conference article

AN - SCOPUS:84915774658

VL - 21

SP - 81

EP - 86

JO - Procedia CIRP

JF - Procedia CIRP

SN - 2212-8271

T2 - 24th CIRP Design Conference 2014: Mass Customization and Personalization

Y2 - 14 April 2014 through 16 April 2014

ER -