Details
| Titel in Übersetzung | (Absence of) Attendance in Peer Review Processes: Concerning the Transformation of Social Interactions in the Virtual Format |
|---|---|
| Originalsprache | Deutsch |
| Seiten (von - bis) | 391-403 |
| Seitenumfang | 13 |
| Fachzeitschrift | Zeitschrift für Soziologie (druck) |
| Jahrgang | 52 |
| Ausgabenummer | 4 |
| Frühes Online-Datum | 31 Okt. 2023 |
| Publikationsstatus | Veröffentlicht - 21 Nov. 2023 |
Abstract
Socially negotiated orders of interaction essentially determine the flow of social situations. In reviews with on-site audits, different social situations exist, which in sum contribute to the production of formally correct and justifiable decisions. But how are the interactions shaped when review procedures are transferred to virtuality? What are the consequences for the review process? Using qualitative interviews, the significance of social situations and their inherent orders of interaction for those involved in peer review in both the present and virtual formats is investigated based on two funding programs of the German Research Foundation (DFG). The results show that virtual meetings limit the possibilities for interaction among all0 participants. In particular, it is problematic that situations with a situationally regulated interaction order are missing, because according to the participants, they are essential for review processes to run smoothly and in such a way that all relevant aspects can be included.
Schlagwörter
- Begutachtungsverfahren, Interaktion, soziale Situation, Virtualität, Wissenschaft, Review Processes, Virtuality, Interaction, Social Situation, Science
ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete
- Sozialwissenschaften (insg.)
- Soziologie und Politikwissenschaften
Zitieren
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTex
- RIS
in: Zeitschrift für Soziologie (druck), Jahrgang 52, Nr. 4, 21.11.2023, S. 391-403.
Publikation: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift › Artikel › Forschung › Peer-Review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - (Fehlende) Anwesenheit bei Begutachtungsprozessen
T2 - Zum Wandel der sozialen Interaktionen im virtuellen Format
AU - Paruschke, Laura
AU - Barlösius, Eva
AU - Philipps, Axel
PY - 2023/11/21
Y1 - 2023/11/21
N2 - Socially negotiated orders of interaction essentially determine the flow of social situations. In reviews with on-site audits, different social situations exist, which in sum contribute to the production of formally correct and justifiable decisions. But how are the interactions shaped when review procedures are transferred to virtuality? What are the consequences for the review process? Using qualitative interviews, the significance of social situations and their inherent orders of interaction for those involved in peer review in both the present and virtual formats is investigated based on two funding programs of the German Research Foundation (DFG). The results show that virtual meetings limit the possibilities for interaction among all0 participants. In particular, it is problematic that situations with a situationally regulated interaction order are missing, because according to the participants, they are essential for review processes to run smoothly and in such a way that all relevant aspects can be included.
AB - Socially negotiated orders of interaction essentially determine the flow of social situations. In reviews with on-site audits, different social situations exist, which in sum contribute to the production of formally correct and justifiable decisions. But how are the interactions shaped when review procedures are transferred to virtuality? What are the consequences for the review process? Using qualitative interviews, the significance of social situations and their inherent orders of interaction for those involved in peer review in both the present and virtual formats is investigated based on two funding programs of the German Research Foundation (DFG). The results show that virtual meetings limit the possibilities for interaction among all0 participants. In particular, it is problematic that situations with a situationally regulated interaction order are missing, because according to the participants, they are essential for review processes to run smoothly and in such a way that all relevant aspects can be included.
KW - Begutachtungsverfahren
KW - Interaktion
KW - soziale Situation
KW - Virtualität
KW - Wissenschaft
KW - Review Processes
KW - Virtuality
KW - Interaction
KW - Social Situation
KW - Science
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85175848616&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1515/zfsoz-2023-2027
DO - 10.1515/zfsoz-2023-2027
M3 - Artikel
AN - SCOPUS:85175848616
VL - 52
SP - 391
EP - 403
JO - Zeitschrift für Soziologie (druck)
JF - Zeitschrift für Soziologie (druck)
SN - 0340-1804
IS - 4
ER -