FDTD Method and HPC for Large-Scale Computational Nanophotonics

Publikation: Beitrag in Buch/Bericht/Sammelwerk/KonferenzbandBeitrag in Buch/SammelwerkForschungPeer-Review

Autoren

Externe Organisationen

  • University of Ottawa
  • Fondazione Bruno Kessler
Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Titel des SammelwerksNATO Science for Peace and Security Series B
UntertitelPhysics and Biophysics
Herausgeber (Verlag)Springer Verlag
Seiten435-439
Seitenumfang5
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 17 Feb. 2017
Extern publiziertJa

Publikationsreihe

NameNATO Science for Peace and Security Series B: Physics and Biophysics
ISSN (Print)1874-6500

Abstract

From 2010 to 2014 the number of papers using the Finite-Difference Time-Domain (FDTD) method for nanophotonics has doubled (from more than 700 to 1430 papers – Google Scholar, searching “FDTD and nanophotonics”). The simulation of the light-matter interaction at the nano-scale requires very fine meshsizes to capture the physics, as for example in nanoplasmonics. Large computational resources are needed to achieve a good accuracy, and not taking care of that could result in non-convergent or inaccurate calculations. The availability of a high-performance computing (HPC) system (a massively parallel IBM Blue Gene/Q of the Southern Ontario Smart Computing Innovation Platform – SOSCIP) allows us to perform high-resolution simulations otherwise impossible using an in-house parallel 3D-FDTD code. Here we demonstrate the convergence of the FDTD method simulating the interaction of a linearly-polarized plane-wave with a gold nanosphere of radius 60 nm in the range 400–700 nm. The full study is reported in (Calà Lesina et al., On the convergence and accuracy of the FDTD method for nanoplasmonics, Opt Exp 23(8), 2015). The problem of the scattering of a plane-wave by a sphere is analytically known from the Mie theory. Varying the mesh size down to the limit allowed by the supercomputer, which has 65,536 cores, the numerical results are compared to the analytical ones. This study can be considered as a guideline for a proper FDTD simulation setup. In Fig. 25.1 we use per-component mesh, double-precision, and Drude+2CP. A mesh size of 0:5 nm is required to get an average percentage error <%err> less than 1%. In Fig. 25.2 we use uniform staircase mesh; we observe a slower convergence. In Fig. 25.3 we use single-precision; we observe divergences due to accumulating round-off errors. In Fig. 25.4 we use the standard Drude model which do not model the interband transitions.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Zitieren

FDTD Method and HPC for Large-Scale Computational Nanophotonics. / Lesina, Antonino Calà; Vaccari, Alessandro; Berini, Pierre et al.
NATO Science for Peace and Security Series B: Physics and Biophysics. Springer Verlag, 2017. S. 435-439 (NATO Science for Peace and Security Series B: Physics and Biophysics).

Publikation: Beitrag in Buch/Bericht/Sammelwerk/KonferenzbandBeitrag in Buch/SammelwerkForschungPeer-Review

Lesina, AC, Vaccari, A, Berini, P & Ramunno, L 2017, FDTD Method and HPC for Large-Scale Computational Nanophotonics. in NATO Science for Peace and Security Series B: Physics and Biophysics. NATO Science for Peace and Security Series B: Physics and Biophysics, Springer Verlag, S. 435-439. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-0850-8_25
Lesina, A. C., Vaccari, A., Berini, P., & Ramunno, L. (2017). FDTD Method and HPC for Large-Scale Computational Nanophotonics. In NATO Science for Peace and Security Series B: Physics and Biophysics (S. 435-439). (NATO Science for Peace and Security Series B: Physics and Biophysics). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-0850-8_25
Lesina AC, Vaccari A, Berini P, Ramunno L. FDTD Method and HPC for Large-Scale Computational Nanophotonics. in NATO Science for Peace and Security Series B: Physics and Biophysics. Springer Verlag. 2017. S. 435-439. (NATO Science for Peace and Security Series B: Physics and Biophysics). doi: 10.1007/978-94-024-0850-8_25
Lesina, Antonino Calà ; Vaccari, Alessandro ; Berini, Pierre et al. / FDTD Method and HPC for Large-Scale Computational Nanophotonics. NATO Science for Peace and Security Series B: Physics and Biophysics. Springer Verlag, 2017. S. 435-439 (NATO Science for Peace and Security Series B: Physics and Biophysics).
Download
@inbook{43e77924e51d438aa75c6b2c564f8541,
title = "FDTD Method and HPC for Large-Scale Computational Nanophotonics",
abstract = "From 2010 to 2014 the number of papers using the Finite-Difference Time-Domain (FDTD) method for nanophotonics has doubled (from more than 700 to 1430 papers – Google Scholar, searching “FDTD and nanophotonics”). The simulation of the light-matter interaction at the nano-scale requires very fine meshsizes to capture the physics, as for example in nanoplasmonics. Large computational resources are needed to achieve a good accuracy, and not taking care of that could result in non-convergent or inaccurate calculations. The availability of a high-performance computing (HPC) system (a massively parallel IBM Blue Gene/Q of the Southern Ontario Smart Computing Innovation Platform – SOSCIP) allows us to perform high-resolution simulations otherwise impossible using an in-house parallel 3D-FDTD code. Here we demonstrate the convergence of the FDTD method simulating the interaction of a linearly-polarized plane-wave with a gold nanosphere of radius 60 nm in the range 400–700 nm. The full study is reported in (Cal{\`a} Lesina et al., On the convergence and accuracy of the FDTD method for nanoplasmonics, Opt Exp 23(8), 2015). The problem of the scattering of a plane-wave by a sphere is analytically known from the Mie theory. Varying the mesh size down to the limit allowed by the supercomputer, which has 65,536 cores, the numerical results are compared to the analytical ones. This study can be considered as a guideline for a proper FDTD simulation setup. In Fig. 25.1 we use per-component mesh, double-precision, and Drude+2CP. A mesh size of 0:5 nm is required to get an average percentage error <%err> less than 1%. In Fig. 25.2 we use uniform staircase mesh; we observe a slower convergence. In Fig. 25.3 we use single-precision; we observe divergences due to accumulating round-off errors. In Fig. 25.4 we use the standard Drude model which do not model the interband transitions.",
author = "Lesina, {Antonino Cal{\`a}} and Alessandro Vaccari and Pierre Berini and Lora Ramunno",
year = "2017",
month = feb,
day = "17",
doi = "10.1007/978-94-024-0850-8_25",
language = "English",
series = "NATO Science for Peace and Security Series B: Physics and Biophysics",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
pages = "435--439",
booktitle = "NATO Science for Peace and Security Series B",
address = "Germany",

}

Download

TY - CHAP

T1 - FDTD Method and HPC for Large-Scale Computational Nanophotonics

AU - Lesina, Antonino Calà

AU - Vaccari, Alessandro

AU - Berini, Pierre

AU - Ramunno, Lora

PY - 2017/2/17

Y1 - 2017/2/17

N2 - From 2010 to 2014 the number of papers using the Finite-Difference Time-Domain (FDTD) method for nanophotonics has doubled (from more than 700 to 1430 papers – Google Scholar, searching “FDTD and nanophotonics”). The simulation of the light-matter interaction at the nano-scale requires very fine meshsizes to capture the physics, as for example in nanoplasmonics. Large computational resources are needed to achieve a good accuracy, and not taking care of that could result in non-convergent or inaccurate calculations. The availability of a high-performance computing (HPC) system (a massively parallel IBM Blue Gene/Q of the Southern Ontario Smart Computing Innovation Platform – SOSCIP) allows us to perform high-resolution simulations otherwise impossible using an in-house parallel 3D-FDTD code. Here we demonstrate the convergence of the FDTD method simulating the interaction of a linearly-polarized plane-wave with a gold nanosphere of radius 60 nm in the range 400–700 nm. The full study is reported in (Calà Lesina et al., On the convergence and accuracy of the FDTD method for nanoplasmonics, Opt Exp 23(8), 2015). The problem of the scattering of a plane-wave by a sphere is analytically known from the Mie theory. Varying the mesh size down to the limit allowed by the supercomputer, which has 65,536 cores, the numerical results are compared to the analytical ones. This study can be considered as a guideline for a proper FDTD simulation setup. In Fig. 25.1 we use per-component mesh, double-precision, and Drude+2CP. A mesh size of 0:5 nm is required to get an average percentage error <%err> less than 1%. In Fig. 25.2 we use uniform staircase mesh; we observe a slower convergence. In Fig. 25.3 we use single-precision; we observe divergences due to accumulating round-off errors. In Fig. 25.4 we use the standard Drude model which do not model the interband transitions.

AB - From 2010 to 2014 the number of papers using the Finite-Difference Time-Domain (FDTD) method for nanophotonics has doubled (from more than 700 to 1430 papers – Google Scholar, searching “FDTD and nanophotonics”). The simulation of the light-matter interaction at the nano-scale requires very fine meshsizes to capture the physics, as for example in nanoplasmonics. Large computational resources are needed to achieve a good accuracy, and not taking care of that could result in non-convergent or inaccurate calculations. The availability of a high-performance computing (HPC) system (a massively parallel IBM Blue Gene/Q of the Southern Ontario Smart Computing Innovation Platform – SOSCIP) allows us to perform high-resolution simulations otherwise impossible using an in-house parallel 3D-FDTD code. Here we demonstrate the convergence of the FDTD method simulating the interaction of a linearly-polarized plane-wave with a gold nanosphere of radius 60 nm in the range 400–700 nm. The full study is reported in (Calà Lesina et al., On the convergence and accuracy of the FDTD method for nanoplasmonics, Opt Exp 23(8), 2015). The problem of the scattering of a plane-wave by a sphere is analytically known from the Mie theory. Varying the mesh size down to the limit allowed by the supercomputer, which has 65,536 cores, the numerical results are compared to the analytical ones. This study can be considered as a guideline for a proper FDTD simulation setup. In Fig. 25.1 we use per-component mesh, double-precision, and Drude+2CP. A mesh size of 0:5 nm is required to get an average percentage error <%err> less than 1%. In Fig. 25.2 we use uniform staircase mesh; we observe a slower convergence. In Fig. 25.3 we use single-precision; we observe divergences due to accumulating round-off errors. In Fig. 25.4 we use the standard Drude model which do not model the interband transitions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85014111676&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-94-024-0850-8_25

DO - 10.1007/978-94-024-0850-8_25

M3 - Contribution to book/anthology

AN - SCOPUS:85014111676

T3 - NATO Science for Peace and Security Series B: Physics and Biophysics

SP - 435

EP - 439

BT - NATO Science for Peace and Security Series B

PB - Springer Verlag

ER -

Von denselben Autoren