Fatou closedness under model uncertainty

Publikation: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift › Artikel › Forschung › Peer-Review

Autoren

  • Marco Maggis
  • Thilo Meyer-Brandis
  • G. Svindland

Externe Organisationen

  • Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU)
  • Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca (UNIMIB)
Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)1325–1343
FachzeitschriftPOSITIVITY
Jahrgang22
Frühes Online-Datum24 März 2018
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - Nov. 2018
Extern publiziertJa

Abstract

There is an error in Proposition 3.10. In fact, the stated proof only shows., Proposition 0.1 If ca * c = ∞ c , then ∞ c is order complete. Conversely, if ∞ c is order complete and if the order continuous dual of ∞ c may be identified with cac, then ca* c = ∞ c . This affects Examples 3.11 and 3.12 in which the additional condition that the order continuous dual of ∞ c may be identified with cac has to be added. We thank Felix-Benedikt Liebrich for discussions which made us recognize the error.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Zitieren

Fatou closedness under model uncertainty. / Maggis, Marco; Meyer-Brandis, Thilo; Svindland, G.
in: POSITIVITY, Jahrgang 22, 11.2018, S. 1325–1343.

Publikation: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift › Artikel › Forschung › Peer-Review

Maggis M, Meyer-Brandis T, Svindland G. Fatou closedness under model uncertainty. POSITIVITY. 2018 Nov;22:1325–1343. Epub 2018 Mär 24. doi: 10.1007/s11117-018-0578-1, 10.1007/s11117-018-0631-0
Maggis, Marco ; Meyer-Brandis, Thilo ; Svindland, G. / Fatou closedness under model uncertainty. in: POSITIVITY. 2018 ; Jahrgang 22. S. 1325–1343.
Download
@article{ead4aecf946245a69ca220a09338f065,
title = "Fatou closedness under model uncertainty",
abstract = "There is an error in Proposition 3.10. In fact, the stated proof only shows., Proposition 0.1 If ca * c = ∞ c , then ∞ c is order complete. Conversely, if ∞ c is order complete and if the order continuous dual of ∞ c may be identified with cac, then ca* c = ∞ c . This affects Examples 3.11 and 3.12 in which the additional condition that the order continuous dual of ∞ c may be identified with cac has to be added. We thank Felix-Benedikt Liebrich for discussions which made us recognize the error. ",
author = "Marco Maggis and Thilo Meyer-Brandis and G. Svindland",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2018, Springer Nature Switzerland AG.",
year = "2018",
month = nov,
doi = "10.1007/s11117-018-0578-1",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "1325–1343",
journal = "POSITIVITY",
issn = "1385-1292",
publisher = "Birkhauser Verlag Basel",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fatou closedness under model uncertainty

AU - Maggis, Marco

AU - Meyer-Brandis, Thilo

AU - Svindland, G.

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2018, Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

PY - 2018/11

Y1 - 2018/11

N2 - There is an error in Proposition 3.10. In fact, the stated proof only shows., Proposition 0.1 If ca * c = ∞ c , then ∞ c is order complete. Conversely, if ∞ c is order complete and if the order continuous dual of ∞ c may be identified with cac, then ca* c = ∞ c . This affects Examples 3.11 and 3.12 in which the additional condition that the order continuous dual of ∞ c may be identified with cac has to be added. We thank Felix-Benedikt Liebrich for discussions which made us recognize the error.

AB - There is an error in Proposition 3.10. In fact, the stated proof only shows., Proposition 0.1 If ca * c = ∞ c , then ∞ c is order complete. Conversely, if ∞ c is order complete and if the order continuous dual of ∞ c may be identified with cac, then ca* c = ∞ c . This affects Examples 3.11 and 3.12 in which the additional condition that the order continuous dual of ∞ c may be identified with cac has to be added. We thank Felix-Benedikt Liebrich for discussions which made us recognize the error.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85057313950&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11117-018-0578-1

DO - 10.1007/s11117-018-0578-1

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 1325

EP - 1343

JO - POSITIVITY

JF - POSITIVITY

SN - 1385-1292

ER -