Evaluation of common tests for fracture characterisation of advanced high-strength sheet steels with the help of the FEA

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftKonferenzaufsatz in FachzeitschriftForschungPeer-Review

Autoren

  • I. Peshekhodov
  • M. Dykiert
  • M. Vucetic
  • B. A. Behrens
Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Aufsatznummer012014
FachzeitschriftIOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering
Jahrgang159
Ausgabenummer1
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - Dez. 2016
VeranstaltungInternational Deep Drawing Research Group Conference on Challenges in Forming High-Strength Sheets, IDDRG 2016 - Linz, Österreich
Dauer: 12 Juni 201615 Juni 2016

Abstract

The paper presents results of evaluation of common tests for fracture characterization of advanced high-strength sheet steels with the help of the FEA. The tests include three in-plane shear tests, two uniaxial tension tests, two plane strain tension tests and two equibiaxial tension tests. Three high-strength steels with different yield loci, strain hardening rates and strengths in three different thicknesses each were used. The evaluation was performed based on the spatial distribution of the equivalent plastic strain and damage variable in the specimen at the moment of crack initiation as well as on the time variation of the stress state at the crack initiation location. For in-plane shear, uniaxial tension and plane strain tension, no test can be unconditionally recommended as disadvantages of all studied tests in these groups cannot be neglected. However, in each of these groups, a test can be chosen, which represents an acceptable compromise between its advantages and disadvantages: the shear test on an IFUM butterfly specimen for in-plane shear, the tensile test on a holed specimen for uniaxial tension and the tensile test on a waisted specimen for plane strain tension. On the contrary, the bulge test on a circular specimen with a punch of ø 100 mm can be unconditionally recommended for equibiaxial tension. In the future, optimisation of the studied tests for in-plane shear, uniaxial tension and plane strain tension appears to be necessary.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Zitieren

Evaluation of common tests for fracture characterisation of advanced high-strength sheet steels with the help of the FEA. / Peshekhodov, I.; Dykiert, M.; Vucetic, M. et al.
in: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, Jahrgang 159, Nr. 1, 012014, 12.2016.

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftKonferenzaufsatz in FachzeitschriftForschungPeer-Review

Peshekhodov, I, Dykiert, M, Vucetic, M & Behrens, BA 2016, 'Evaluation of common tests for fracture characterisation of advanced high-strength sheet steels with the help of the FEA', IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, Jg. 159, Nr. 1, 012014. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/159/1/012014
Peshekhodov, I., Dykiert, M., Vucetic, M., & Behrens, B. A. (2016). Evaluation of common tests for fracture characterisation of advanced high-strength sheet steels with the help of the FEA. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 159(1), Artikel 012014. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/159/1/012014
Peshekhodov I, Dykiert M, Vucetic M, Behrens BA. Evaluation of common tests for fracture characterisation of advanced high-strength sheet steels with the help of the FEA. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2016 Dez;159(1):012014. doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/159/1/012014
Peshekhodov, I. ; Dykiert, M. ; Vucetic, M. et al. / Evaluation of common tests for fracture characterisation of advanced high-strength sheet steels with the help of the FEA. in: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2016 ; Jahrgang 159, Nr. 1.
Download
@article{42fc40f6531c423ea6936d0aa968ca67,
title = "Evaluation of common tests for fracture characterisation of advanced high-strength sheet steels with the help of the FEA",
abstract = "The paper presents results of evaluation of common tests for fracture characterization of advanced high-strength sheet steels with the help of the FEA. The tests include three in-plane shear tests, two uniaxial tension tests, two plane strain tension tests and two equibiaxial tension tests. Three high-strength steels with different yield loci, strain hardening rates and strengths in three different thicknesses each were used. The evaluation was performed based on the spatial distribution of the equivalent plastic strain and damage variable in the specimen at the moment of crack initiation as well as on the time variation of the stress state at the crack initiation location. For in-plane shear, uniaxial tension and plane strain tension, no test can be unconditionally recommended as disadvantages of all studied tests in these groups cannot be neglected. However, in each of these groups, a test can be chosen, which represents an acceptable compromise between its advantages and disadvantages: the shear test on an IFUM butterfly specimen for in-plane shear, the tensile test on a holed specimen for uniaxial tension and the tensile test on a waisted specimen for plane strain tension. On the contrary, the bulge test on a circular specimen with a punch of {\o} 100 mm can be unconditionally recommended for equibiaxial tension. In the future, optimisation of the studied tests for in-plane shear, uniaxial tension and plane strain tension appears to be necessary.",
author = "I. Peshekhodov and M. Dykiert and M. Vucetic and Behrens, {B. A.}",
year = "2016",
month = dec,
doi = "10.1088/1757-899X/159/1/012014",
language = "English",
volume = "159",
number = "1",
note = "International Deep Drawing Research Group Conference on Challenges in Forming High-Strength Sheets, IDDRG 2016 ; Conference date: 12-06-2016 Through 15-06-2016",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of common tests for fracture characterisation of advanced high-strength sheet steels with the help of the FEA

AU - Peshekhodov, I.

AU - Dykiert, M.

AU - Vucetic, M.

AU - Behrens, B. A.

PY - 2016/12

Y1 - 2016/12

N2 - The paper presents results of evaluation of common tests for fracture characterization of advanced high-strength sheet steels with the help of the FEA. The tests include three in-plane shear tests, two uniaxial tension tests, two plane strain tension tests and two equibiaxial tension tests. Three high-strength steels with different yield loci, strain hardening rates and strengths in three different thicknesses each were used. The evaluation was performed based on the spatial distribution of the equivalent plastic strain and damage variable in the specimen at the moment of crack initiation as well as on the time variation of the stress state at the crack initiation location. For in-plane shear, uniaxial tension and plane strain tension, no test can be unconditionally recommended as disadvantages of all studied tests in these groups cannot be neglected. However, in each of these groups, a test can be chosen, which represents an acceptable compromise between its advantages and disadvantages: the shear test on an IFUM butterfly specimen for in-plane shear, the tensile test on a holed specimen for uniaxial tension and the tensile test on a waisted specimen for plane strain tension. On the contrary, the bulge test on a circular specimen with a punch of ø 100 mm can be unconditionally recommended for equibiaxial tension. In the future, optimisation of the studied tests for in-plane shear, uniaxial tension and plane strain tension appears to be necessary.

AB - The paper presents results of evaluation of common tests for fracture characterization of advanced high-strength sheet steels with the help of the FEA. The tests include three in-plane shear tests, two uniaxial tension tests, two plane strain tension tests and two equibiaxial tension tests. Three high-strength steels with different yield loci, strain hardening rates and strengths in three different thicknesses each were used. The evaluation was performed based on the spatial distribution of the equivalent plastic strain and damage variable in the specimen at the moment of crack initiation as well as on the time variation of the stress state at the crack initiation location. For in-plane shear, uniaxial tension and plane strain tension, no test can be unconditionally recommended as disadvantages of all studied tests in these groups cannot be neglected. However, in each of these groups, a test can be chosen, which represents an acceptable compromise between its advantages and disadvantages: the shear test on an IFUM butterfly specimen for in-plane shear, the tensile test on a holed specimen for uniaxial tension and the tensile test on a waisted specimen for plane strain tension. On the contrary, the bulge test on a circular specimen with a punch of ø 100 mm can be unconditionally recommended for equibiaxial tension. In the future, optimisation of the studied tests for in-plane shear, uniaxial tension and plane strain tension appears to be necessary.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85014698371&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1088/1757-899X/159/1/012014

DO - 10.1088/1757-899X/159/1/012014

M3 - Conference article

AN - SCOPUS:85014698371

VL - 159

JO - IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering

JF - IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering

SN - 1757-8981

IS - 1

M1 - 012014

T2 - International Deep Drawing Research Group Conference on Challenges in Forming High-Strength Sheets, IDDRG 2016

Y2 - 12 June 2016 through 15 June 2016

ER -