Evaluation of animal carcinogenicity studies: Cochran-armitage trend test vs. multiple contrast tests

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftÜbersichtsarbeitForschungPeer-Review

Autorschaft

  • Ludwig A. Hothorn
  • Frank Bretz

Organisationseinheiten

Externe Organisationen

  • Altana Pharma
Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)553-567
Seitenumfang15
FachzeitschriftBiometrical journal
Jahrgang42
Ausgabenummer5
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 5 Sept. 2000

Abstract

Typical animal carcinogenicity studies involve the comparison of several dose groups to a negative control. The unconnected asymptotic Cochran-Armitage trend test with equally spaced dose scores is the most frequently used test in such set-ups. However, this test based on a weighted linear regression on proportions. It is well known that the Cochran-Armitage test lacks in power for other shapes than the assumed linear one. Therefore, dichotomous multiple contrast tests are introduced. These build the maximum over several single contrasts, where each of them is chosen appropriately to cover a specific dose-response shape. An extensive power study has been conducted to compare multiple contrast tests with the approaches used so far. Crucial results will be presented in this paper. Moreover, exact tests and continuity corrected versions are introduced and compared to the traditional uncorrected approaches regarding size and power behaviour. A trend test for any shape of the dose-response relationship for either crude tumour rates or mortality-adjusted rates based on the simple Poly-3 transformation is proposed for evaluation of carcinogenicity studies.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Zitieren

Evaluation of animal carcinogenicity studies: Cochran-armitage trend test vs. multiple contrast tests. / Hothorn, Ludwig A.; Bretz, Frank.
in: Biometrical journal, Jahrgang 42, Nr. 5, 05.09.2000, S. 553-567.

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftÜbersichtsarbeitForschungPeer-Review

Hothorn LA, Bretz F. Evaluation of animal carcinogenicity studies: Cochran-armitage trend test vs. multiple contrast tests. Biometrical journal. 2000 Sep 5;42(5):553-567. doi: 10.1002/1521-4036(200009)42:5<553::AID-BIMJ553>3.0.CO;2-R
Hothorn, Ludwig A. ; Bretz, Frank. / Evaluation of animal carcinogenicity studies : Cochran-armitage trend test vs. multiple contrast tests. in: Biometrical journal. 2000 ; Jahrgang 42, Nr. 5. S. 553-567.
Download
@article{cb5b40e07c6649bf8d450d251c6d9a53,
title = "Evaluation of animal carcinogenicity studies: Cochran-armitage trend test vs. multiple contrast tests",
abstract = "Typical animal carcinogenicity studies involve the comparison of several dose groups to a negative control. The unconnected asymptotic Cochran-Armitage trend test with equally spaced dose scores is the most frequently used test in such set-ups. However, this test based on a weighted linear regression on proportions. It is well known that the Cochran-Armitage test lacks in power for other shapes than the assumed linear one. Therefore, dichotomous multiple contrast tests are introduced. These build the maximum over several single contrasts, where each of them is chosen appropriately to cover a specific dose-response shape. An extensive power study has been conducted to compare multiple contrast tests with the approaches used so far. Crucial results will be presented in this paper. Moreover, exact tests and continuity corrected versions are introduced and compared to the traditional uncorrected approaches regarding size and power behaviour. A trend test for any shape of the dose-response relationship for either crude tumour rates or mortality-adjusted rates based on the simple Poly-3 transformation is proposed for evaluation of carcinogenicity studies.",
keywords = "Animal carcinogenicity study, Cochran-armitage trend test, Multiple contrast tests, Poly-3 test",
author = "Hothorn, {Ludwig A.} and Frank Bretz",
year = "2000",
month = sep,
day = "5",
doi = "10.1002/1521-4036(200009)42:5<553::AID-BIMJ553>3.0.CO;2-R",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "553--567",
journal = "Biometrical journal",
issn = "0323-3847",
publisher = "Wiley-VCH Verlag",
number = "5",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of animal carcinogenicity studies

T2 - Cochran-armitage trend test vs. multiple contrast tests

AU - Hothorn, Ludwig A.

AU - Bretz, Frank

PY - 2000/9/5

Y1 - 2000/9/5

N2 - Typical animal carcinogenicity studies involve the comparison of several dose groups to a negative control. The unconnected asymptotic Cochran-Armitage trend test with equally spaced dose scores is the most frequently used test in such set-ups. However, this test based on a weighted linear regression on proportions. It is well known that the Cochran-Armitage test lacks in power for other shapes than the assumed linear one. Therefore, dichotomous multiple contrast tests are introduced. These build the maximum over several single contrasts, where each of them is chosen appropriately to cover a specific dose-response shape. An extensive power study has been conducted to compare multiple contrast tests with the approaches used so far. Crucial results will be presented in this paper. Moreover, exact tests and continuity corrected versions are introduced and compared to the traditional uncorrected approaches regarding size and power behaviour. A trend test for any shape of the dose-response relationship for either crude tumour rates or mortality-adjusted rates based on the simple Poly-3 transformation is proposed for evaluation of carcinogenicity studies.

AB - Typical animal carcinogenicity studies involve the comparison of several dose groups to a negative control. The unconnected asymptotic Cochran-Armitage trend test with equally spaced dose scores is the most frequently used test in such set-ups. However, this test based on a weighted linear regression on proportions. It is well known that the Cochran-Armitage test lacks in power for other shapes than the assumed linear one. Therefore, dichotomous multiple contrast tests are introduced. These build the maximum over several single contrasts, where each of them is chosen appropriately to cover a specific dose-response shape. An extensive power study has been conducted to compare multiple contrast tests with the approaches used so far. Crucial results will be presented in this paper. Moreover, exact tests and continuity corrected versions are introduced and compared to the traditional uncorrected approaches regarding size and power behaviour. A trend test for any shape of the dose-response relationship for either crude tumour rates or mortality-adjusted rates based on the simple Poly-3 transformation is proposed for evaluation of carcinogenicity studies.

KW - Animal carcinogenicity study

KW - Cochran-armitage trend test

KW - Multiple contrast tests

KW - Poly-3 test

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034557649&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/1521-4036(200009)42:5<553::AID-BIMJ553>3.0.CO;2-R

DO - 10.1002/1521-4036(200009)42:5<553::AID-BIMJ553>3.0.CO;2-R

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:0034557649

VL - 42

SP - 553

EP - 567

JO - Biometrical journal

JF - Biometrical journal

SN - 0323-3847

IS - 5

ER -