Evaluating the NASA MERRA-2 climate reanalysis and ESA CCI satellite remote sensing soil moisture over the contiguous United States

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Autoren

  • Mohammad Valipour
  • Sayed M. Bateni
  • Jörg Dietrich
  • Essam Heggy
  • Mansour Almazroui

Externe Organisationen

  • Metropolitan State University of Denver (MSU)
  • University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa
  • University of Southern California
  • California Institute of Technology (Caltech)
  • King Abdulaziz University
  • University of East Anglia
Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)4639-4665
Seitenumfang27
FachzeitschriftInternational Journal of Remote Sensing
Jahrgang44
Ausgabenummer15
Frühes Online-Datum28 Juli 2023
PublikationsstatusElektronisch veröffentlicht (E-Pub) - 28 Juli 2023

Abstract

Accurate large-scale soil moisture (SM) retrievals using the daily NASA MERRA-2’ climate reanalysis and ESA’ Climate Change Initiative (CCI) remote sensing datasets are compromised by temporal and spatial ambiguities. To address this deficiency, we assess the accuracy of the above-mentioned datasets against the Soil Climate Analysis Network (SCAN) in-situ measurements at nine sites across the contiguous United States (CONUS) during 2014–2016. The sites are selected to represent different climate regions over the CONUS. SM dynamics from NASA MERRA-2 and ESA CCI are compared with those of SCAN, and an SM dataset is developed based on a spatiotemporal analysis. Our results show that the NASA MERRA-2 and ESA CCI SM datasets have different accuracies at the nine SCAN sites in different seasons. The MERRA-2 and CCI SM datasets have the highest accuracy at sites with the lowest number of extreme events, indicating that both datasets cannot robustly capture extremum soil moisture values. The highest (lowest) agreement between the MERRA-2/CCI and SCAN SM data is observed in April (February) with the nine-site average unbiased root-mean-square-difference (ubRMSD) of 0.0638 cm3/cm3 (0.0914 cm3/cm3). In all the nine sites, the CCI SM data are more accurate than those of MERRA-2 in April–October. The CCI SM data shows greater accuracy in the sites with lower SM values and/or higher SM variability. MERRA-2 and CCI SM datasets show higher and lower accuracy at the sites with pasture and agricultural vegetation, respectively. Finally, a new SM dataset is created by using the more accurate SM data from MERRA-2 and CCI in each site and season.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Ziele für nachhaltige Entwicklung

Zitieren

Evaluating the NASA MERRA-2 climate reanalysis and ESA CCI satellite remote sensing soil moisture over the contiguous United States. / Valipour, Mohammad; Bateni, Sayed M.; Dietrich, Jörg et al.
in: International Journal of Remote Sensing, Jahrgang 44, Nr. 15, 28.07.2023, S. 4639-4665.

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Valipour M, Bateni SM, Dietrich J, Heggy E, Almazroui M. Evaluating the NASA MERRA-2 climate reanalysis and ESA CCI satellite remote sensing soil moisture over the contiguous United States. International Journal of Remote Sensing. 2023 Jul 28;44(15):4639-4665. Epub 2023 Jul 28. doi: 10.1080/01431161.2023.2237665
Download
@article{3ea4c0cb918f44c3b9d58d68e163dd6d,
title = "Evaluating the NASA MERRA-2 climate reanalysis and ESA CCI satellite remote sensing soil moisture over the contiguous United States",
abstract = "Accurate large-scale soil moisture (SM) retrievals using the daily NASA MERRA-2{\textquoteright} climate reanalysis and ESA{\textquoteright} Climate Change Initiative (CCI) remote sensing datasets are compromised by temporal and spatial ambiguities. To address this deficiency, we assess the accuracy of the above-mentioned datasets against the Soil Climate Analysis Network (SCAN) in-situ measurements at nine sites across the contiguous United States (CONUS) during 2014–2016. The sites are selected to represent different climate regions over the CONUS. SM dynamics from NASA MERRA-2 and ESA CCI are compared with those of SCAN, and an SM dataset is developed based on a spatiotemporal analysis. Our results show that the NASA MERRA-2 and ESA CCI SM datasets have different accuracies at the nine SCAN sites in different seasons. The MERRA-2 and CCI SM datasets have the highest accuracy at sites with the lowest number of extreme events, indicating that both datasets cannot robustly capture extremum soil moisture values. The highest (lowest) agreement between the MERRA-2/CCI and SCAN SM data is observed in April (February) with the nine-site average unbiased root-mean-square-difference (ubRMSD) of 0.0638 cm3/cm3 (0.0914 cm3/cm3). In all the nine sites, the CCI SM data are more accurate than those of MERRA-2 in April–October. The CCI SM data shows greater accuracy in the sites with lower SM values and/or higher SM variability. MERRA-2 and CCI SM datasets show higher and lower accuracy at the sites with pasture and agricultural vegetation, respectively. Finally, a new SM dataset is created by using the more accurate SM data from MERRA-2 and CCI in each site and season.",
keywords = "climate reanalysis, combining datasets, CONUS, measurement, NASA, remote sensing retrievals, SCAN, Soil moisture",
author = "Mohammad Valipour and Bateni, {Sayed M.} and J{\"o}rg Dietrich and Essam Heggy and Mansour Almazroui",
note = "Funding Information: Part of this research is funded under support from the Zumberge Research and Innovation Fund of the University of Southern California allocated to the Arid Climates and Water Research Center—AWARE. The authors tend to have special thanks to Dr. John Nieber, Professor at the University of Minnesota for his invaluable and constructive comments on the paper.",
year = "2023",
month = jul,
day = "28",
doi = "10.1080/01431161.2023.2237665",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "4639--4665",
journal = "International Journal of Remote Sensing",
issn = "0143-1161",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "15",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluating the NASA MERRA-2 climate reanalysis and ESA CCI satellite remote sensing soil moisture over the contiguous United States

AU - Valipour, Mohammad

AU - Bateni, Sayed M.

AU - Dietrich, Jörg

AU - Heggy, Essam

AU - Almazroui, Mansour

N1 - Funding Information: Part of this research is funded under support from the Zumberge Research and Innovation Fund of the University of Southern California allocated to the Arid Climates and Water Research Center—AWARE. The authors tend to have special thanks to Dr. John Nieber, Professor at the University of Minnesota for his invaluable and constructive comments on the paper.

PY - 2023/7/28

Y1 - 2023/7/28

N2 - Accurate large-scale soil moisture (SM) retrievals using the daily NASA MERRA-2’ climate reanalysis and ESA’ Climate Change Initiative (CCI) remote sensing datasets are compromised by temporal and spatial ambiguities. To address this deficiency, we assess the accuracy of the above-mentioned datasets against the Soil Climate Analysis Network (SCAN) in-situ measurements at nine sites across the contiguous United States (CONUS) during 2014–2016. The sites are selected to represent different climate regions over the CONUS. SM dynamics from NASA MERRA-2 and ESA CCI are compared with those of SCAN, and an SM dataset is developed based on a spatiotemporal analysis. Our results show that the NASA MERRA-2 and ESA CCI SM datasets have different accuracies at the nine SCAN sites in different seasons. The MERRA-2 and CCI SM datasets have the highest accuracy at sites with the lowest number of extreme events, indicating that both datasets cannot robustly capture extremum soil moisture values. The highest (lowest) agreement between the MERRA-2/CCI and SCAN SM data is observed in April (February) with the nine-site average unbiased root-mean-square-difference (ubRMSD) of 0.0638 cm3/cm3 (0.0914 cm3/cm3). In all the nine sites, the CCI SM data are more accurate than those of MERRA-2 in April–October. The CCI SM data shows greater accuracy in the sites with lower SM values and/or higher SM variability. MERRA-2 and CCI SM datasets show higher and lower accuracy at the sites with pasture and agricultural vegetation, respectively. Finally, a new SM dataset is created by using the more accurate SM data from MERRA-2 and CCI in each site and season.

AB - Accurate large-scale soil moisture (SM) retrievals using the daily NASA MERRA-2’ climate reanalysis and ESA’ Climate Change Initiative (CCI) remote sensing datasets are compromised by temporal and spatial ambiguities. To address this deficiency, we assess the accuracy of the above-mentioned datasets against the Soil Climate Analysis Network (SCAN) in-situ measurements at nine sites across the contiguous United States (CONUS) during 2014–2016. The sites are selected to represent different climate regions over the CONUS. SM dynamics from NASA MERRA-2 and ESA CCI are compared with those of SCAN, and an SM dataset is developed based on a spatiotemporal analysis. Our results show that the NASA MERRA-2 and ESA CCI SM datasets have different accuracies at the nine SCAN sites in different seasons. The MERRA-2 and CCI SM datasets have the highest accuracy at sites with the lowest number of extreme events, indicating that both datasets cannot robustly capture extremum soil moisture values. The highest (lowest) agreement between the MERRA-2/CCI and SCAN SM data is observed in April (February) with the nine-site average unbiased root-mean-square-difference (ubRMSD) of 0.0638 cm3/cm3 (0.0914 cm3/cm3). In all the nine sites, the CCI SM data are more accurate than those of MERRA-2 in April–October. The CCI SM data shows greater accuracy in the sites with lower SM values and/or higher SM variability. MERRA-2 and CCI SM datasets show higher and lower accuracy at the sites with pasture and agricultural vegetation, respectively. Finally, a new SM dataset is created by using the more accurate SM data from MERRA-2 and CCI in each site and season.

KW - climate reanalysis

KW - combining datasets

KW - CONUS

KW - measurement

KW - NASA

KW - remote sensing retrievals

KW - SCAN

KW - Soil moisture

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85166211398&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/01431161.2023.2237665

DO - 10.1080/01431161.2023.2237665

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85166211398

VL - 44

SP - 4639

EP - 4665

JO - International Journal of Remote Sensing

JF - International Journal of Remote Sensing

SN - 0143-1161

IS - 15

ER -

Von denselben Autoren