Evaluating Integration Strategies for Visuo-Haptic Object Recognition

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Autoren

Externe Organisationen

  • Universität Hamburg
Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)408-425
Seitenumfang18
FachzeitschriftCognitive computation
Jahrgang10
Ausgabenummer3
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 1 Juni 2018
Extern publiziertJa

Abstract

In computational systems for visuo-haptic object recognition, vision and haptics are often modeled as separate processes. But this is far from what really happens in the human brain, where cross- as well as multimodal interactions take place between the two sensory modalities. Generally, three main principles can be identified as underlying the processing of the visual and haptic object-related stimuli in the brain: (1) hierarchical processing, (2) the divergence of the processing onto substreams for object shape and material perception, and (3) the experience-driven self-organization of the integratory neural circuits. The question arises whether an object recognition system can benefit in terms of performance from adopting these brain-inspired processing principles for the integration of the visual and haptic inputs. To address this, we compare the integration strategy that incorporates all three principles to the two commonly used integration strategies in the literature. We collected data with a NAO robot enhanced with inexpensive contact microphones as tactile sensors. The results of our experiments involving every-day objects indicate that (1) the contact microphones are a good alternative to capturing tactile information and that (2) organizing the processing of the visual and haptic inputs hierarchically and in two pre-processing streams is helpful performance-wise. Nevertheless, further research is needed to effectively quantify the role of each identified principle by itself as well as in combination with others.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Zitieren

Evaluating Integration Strategies for Visuo-Haptic Object Recognition. / Toprak, Sibel; Navarro-Guerrero, Nicolás; Wermter, Stefan.
in: Cognitive computation, Jahrgang 10, Nr. 3, 01.06.2018, S. 408-425.

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Toprak S, Navarro-Guerrero N, Wermter S. Evaluating Integration Strategies for Visuo-Haptic Object Recognition. Cognitive computation. 2018 Jun 1;10(3):408-425. doi: 10.1007/s12559-017-9536-7
Toprak, Sibel ; Navarro-Guerrero, Nicolás ; Wermter, Stefan. / Evaluating Integration Strategies for Visuo-Haptic Object Recognition. in: Cognitive computation. 2018 ; Jahrgang 10, Nr. 3. S. 408-425.
Download
@article{dd763f0215534c0eb3f712bcbaece09c,
title = "Evaluating Integration Strategies for Visuo-Haptic Object Recognition",
abstract = "In computational systems for visuo-haptic object recognition, vision and haptics are often modeled as separate processes. But this is far from what really happens in the human brain, where cross- as well as multimodal interactions take place between the two sensory modalities. Generally, three main principles can be identified as underlying the processing of the visual and haptic object-related stimuli in the brain: (1) hierarchical processing, (2) the divergence of the processing onto substreams for object shape and material perception, and (3) the experience-driven self-organization of the integratory neural circuits. The question arises whether an object recognition system can benefit in terms of performance from adopting these brain-inspired processing principles for the integration of the visual and haptic inputs. To address this, we compare the integration strategy that incorporates all three principles to the two commonly used integration strategies in the literature. We collected data with a NAO robot enhanced with inexpensive contact microphones as tactile sensors. The results of our experiments involving every-day objects indicate that (1) the contact microphones are a good alternative to capturing tactile information and that (2) organizing the processing of the visual and haptic inputs hierarchically and in two pre-processing streams is helpful performance-wise. Nevertheless, further research is needed to effectively quantify the role of each identified principle by itself as well as in combination with others.",
keywords = "Brain-inspired architectures, Haptics, Multimodal integration, Object recognition, Tactile sensing, Vision",
author = "Sibel Toprak and Nicol{\'a}s Navarro-Guerrero and Stefan Wermter",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2017, The Author(s).",
year = "2018",
month = jun,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s12559-017-9536-7",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "408--425",
journal = "Cognitive computation",
issn = "1866-9956",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "3",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluating Integration Strategies for Visuo-Haptic Object Recognition

AU - Toprak, Sibel

AU - Navarro-Guerrero, Nicolás

AU - Wermter, Stefan

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2017, The Author(s).

PY - 2018/6/1

Y1 - 2018/6/1

N2 - In computational systems for visuo-haptic object recognition, vision and haptics are often modeled as separate processes. But this is far from what really happens in the human brain, where cross- as well as multimodal interactions take place between the two sensory modalities. Generally, three main principles can be identified as underlying the processing of the visual and haptic object-related stimuli in the brain: (1) hierarchical processing, (2) the divergence of the processing onto substreams for object shape and material perception, and (3) the experience-driven self-organization of the integratory neural circuits. The question arises whether an object recognition system can benefit in terms of performance from adopting these brain-inspired processing principles for the integration of the visual and haptic inputs. To address this, we compare the integration strategy that incorporates all three principles to the two commonly used integration strategies in the literature. We collected data with a NAO robot enhanced with inexpensive contact microphones as tactile sensors. The results of our experiments involving every-day objects indicate that (1) the contact microphones are a good alternative to capturing tactile information and that (2) organizing the processing of the visual and haptic inputs hierarchically and in two pre-processing streams is helpful performance-wise. Nevertheless, further research is needed to effectively quantify the role of each identified principle by itself as well as in combination with others.

AB - In computational systems for visuo-haptic object recognition, vision and haptics are often modeled as separate processes. But this is far from what really happens in the human brain, where cross- as well as multimodal interactions take place between the two sensory modalities. Generally, three main principles can be identified as underlying the processing of the visual and haptic object-related stimuli in the brain: (1) hierarchical processing, (2) the divergence of the processing onto substreams for object shape and material perception, and (3) the experience-driven self-organization of the integratory neural circuits. The question arises whether an object recognition system can benefit in terms of performance from adopting these brain-inspired processing principles for the integration of the visual and haptic inputs. To address this, we compare the integration strategy that incorporates all three principles to the two commonly used integration strategies in the literature. We collected data with a NAO robot enhanced with inexpensive contact microphones as tactile sensors. The results of our experiments involving every-day objects indicate that (1) the contact microphones are a good alternative to capturing tactile information and that (2) organizing the processing of the visual and haptic inputs hierarchically and in two pre-processing streams is helpful performance-wise. Nevertheless, further research is needed to effectively quantify the role of each identified principle by itself as well as in combination with others.

KW - Brain-inspired architectures

KW - Haptics

KW - Multimodal integration

KW - Object recognition

KW - Tactile sensing

KW - Vision

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85039561066&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s12559-017-9536-7

DO - 10.1007/s12559-017-9536-7

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85039561066

VL - 10

SP - 408

EP - 425

JO - Cognitive computation

JF - Cognitive computation

SN - 1866-9956

IS - 3

ER -

Von denselben Autoren